Faculty of Economics, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Faculty of Business and Commerce, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 9;15(10):e0240240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240240. eCollection 2020.
The association of socioeconomic status and lifestyle behaviours on mental health appears well-established in the literature, as several studies report that better socioeconomic status such as higher levels of disposable income and employment as well as practising healthy lifestyles can enhance mental well-being. However, the reliance on cross-sectional correlations and lack of adequate statistical controls are possible limitations. This study aims to add the evidence of longitudinal association to the literature by using Japanese representative longitudinal household panel data. We employed panel data analytical techniques such as the random-effects conditional logistic regression (RE-CLR) and the fixed-effects conditional logistic regression (FE-CLR) models with possible time variant confounders being controlled. Our sample was comprised of 14,717 observations of 3,501 individuals aged 22-59 years for five waves of the Japanese Household Panel Survey. We confirmed many of the factors associated with mental health reported in existing studies by analysing cross-sectional data. These significant associations are also longitudinal (within) associations estimated by the FE-CLR models. Such factors include unemployment, low household income, short nightly sleeping duration, and lack of exercise. However, we also found that several factors such as disposable income, living alone, and drinking habits are not significantly associated with mental health in the FE-CRL models. The results imply the reverse causality that poor mental health conditions cause lower disposal income, possibly due to the inability to exhibit higher productivity, but an increase in disposal income would not necessarily improve mental health conditions. In this case, aggressive policy interventions to increase the disposal income of people of lower socioeconomic backgrounds would not necessarily be effective to minimize health inequalities.
社会经济地位和生活方式行为对心理健康的影响在文献中已经得到很好的证实,因为多项研究报告称,更好的社会经济地位,如更高的可支配收入和就业水平,以及健康的生活方式,都可以增强心理健康。然而,依赖横断面相关性和缺乏充分的统计控制可能是其局限性。本研究旨在通过使用日本代表性的纵向家庭面板数据,为文献增加纵向关联的证据。我们采用了面板数据分析技术,如随机效应条件逻辑回归(RE-CLR)和固定效应条件逻辑回归(FE-CLR)模型,并控制了可能随时间变化的混杂因素。我们的样本由日本家庭调查的五轮数据中的 3501 名 22-59 岁个体的 14717 个观测值组成。通过分析横断面数据,我们证实了许多与现有研究报告的心理健康相关的因素。这些显著的关联也是通过 FE-CLR 模型估计的纵向(个体内)关联。这些因素包括失业、低收入家庭、夜间睡眠时间短和缺乏锻炼。然而,我们还发现,一些因素,如可支配收入、独居和饮酒习惯,在 FE-CRL 模型中与心理健康没有显著关联。结果表明存在反向因果关系,即较差的心理健康状况导致可支配收入较低,可能是由于无法表现出更高的生产力,但可支配收入的增加不一定会改善心理健康状况。在这种情况下,增加社会经济地位较低人群的可支配收入的积极政策干预措施不一定能有效地减少健康不平等。