Faculty of Economics, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Faculty of Business and Commerce, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 20;18(11):e0294189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294189. eCollection 2023.
This paper estimated the impact of intervention effects (state of emergency (SOE) or quasi-SOE requirements) and information effects (publicized increases in the number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) deaths and fear of infection) on preventive behaviors and telecommuting during the COVID-19 pandemic using the Japan Household Panel Survey. Our results indicated that SOEs and quasi-SOEs had positive effects on the adoption of preventive behaviors among individuals, including handwashing, which indicates that an SOE has a direct effect and an indirect effect. Although SOEs in Japan were less enforceable and more lenient than those in other countries, they still had a certain effect on people's adoption of preventive behaviors. However, the contribution of information effects was much larger than that of intervention effects, suggesting the importance of how and when information should be communicated to the public to prevent the spread of infection.
本文利用日本住户动态调查数据,评估了干预措施效果(紧急状态或准紧急状态要求)和信息效果(公布的 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)死亡人数增加和对感染的恐惧)对 COVID-19 大流行期间预防行为和远程办公的影响。研究结果表明,紧急状态或准紧急状态对个人采取预防行为(包括洗手)具有积极影响,这表明紧急状态或准紧急状态具有直接和间接影响。尽管日本的紧急状态或准紧急状态的执行力度比其他国家低,且更为宽松,但它们对人们采取预防行为仍有一定的影响。然而,信息效果的贡献比干预措施效果大得多,这表明了如何以及何时向公众传达信息以防止感染传播的重要性。