Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå university, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Stockholm and R & D Department, Stockholms Sjukhem Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jan;61(1):e11-e19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.043. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
Although the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic might affect important clinical routines, few studies have focused on the maintenance of good quality in end-of-life care.
The objective was to examine whether adherence to clinical routines for good end-of-life care differed for deaths because of COVID-19 compared with a reference cohort from 2019 and whether they differed between nursing homes and hospitals.
Data about five items reflecting clinical routines for persons who died an expected death from COVID-19 during the first three months of the pandemic (March-May 2020) were collected from the Swedish Register of Palliative Care. The items were compared between the COVID-19 group and the reference cohort and between the nursing home and hospital COVID-19 deaths.
About 1316 expected deaths were identified in nursing homes and 685 in hospitals. Four of the five items differed for total COVID-19 group compared with the reference cohort: fewer were examined by a physician during the last days before death, pain and oral health were less likely to be assessed, and fewer had a specialized palliative care team consultation (P < 0.0001, respectively). Assessment of symptoms other than pain did not differ significantly. The five items differed between the nursing homes and hospitals in the COVID-19 group, most notably regarding the proportion of persons examined by a physician during the last days (nursing homes: 18%; hospitals: 100%).
This national register study shows that several clinical routines for end-of-life care did not meet the usual standards during the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden. Higher preparedness for and monitoring of end-of-life care quality should be integrated into future pandemic plans.
尽管 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行可能会影响重要的临床常规,但很少有研究关注临终关怀的质量保持。
本研究旨在检验 COVID-19 患者死亡与 2019 年参考队列相比,其临终关怀的临床常规遵循情况是否存在差异,以及这种差异是否存在于养老院和医院之间。
从瑞典姑息治疗登记处收集了 COVID-19 大流行前三个月(2020 年 3 月至 5 月)期间因 COVID-19 预计死亡的患者的五个反映临床常规的项目的数据。将这些项目与 COVID-19 组和参考队列进行比较,并与养老院和医院的 COVID-19 死亡进行比较。
在养老院中,约有 1316 例预期死亡,在医院中,约有 685 例预期死亡。与参考队列相比,COVID-19 总人群的五个项目中有四个存在差异:在死亡前的最后几天接受医生检查的人数较少,疼痛和口腔健康评估的可能性较小,并且较少有专门的姑息治疗团队咨询(P<0.0001)。除疼痛外,其他症状的评估无显著差异。在 COVID-19 组中,养老院和医院之间的五个项目存在差异,尤其是在死亡前最后几天接受医生检查的人数比例方面(养老院:18%;医院:100%)。
本项全国登记研究表明,在 COVID-19 大流行的头三个月,瑞典的几项临终关怀临床常规未达到通常标准。未来的大流行计划应纳入对临终关怀质量的更高准备和监测。