Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查中常规回肠插管不会提高息肉检出率:一项回顾性研究。

Routine ileal intubation in colonoscopy does not increase the polyp detection rate: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Wang Weiyi, Chen Ke, Xu Ying, Zhou Yufen, Chen Ping

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China., Shanghai, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China., Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Z Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;58(10):955-959. doi: 10.1055/a-1213-6701. Epub 2020 Oct 9.

Abstract

Colonoscopy is effective in the prevention and screening of colorectal cancer. Whether terminal ileal (TI) intubation is required during conventional colonoscopy and whether it offers clinical benefits with respect to polyp detection rate (PDR) remain unclear. This retrospective study included patients who underwent colonoscopy at our hospital between July 1, 2018 and April 20, 2019. The positive findings and time for TI intubation were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with PDR. There were 1675 patients with cecal intubation colonoscopy, including 994 (59 %) with TI intubation and 8 (1 %) with intestinal disease. The mean time for TI intubation was 40 seconds (3-338), and the mean time from cecal intubation to arrival at the deep part of TI mucosa was 24 seconds (2-118). The overall PDR was 27 %. On multivariable analysis, age > 50 years [95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.837-4.590], male sex (95 %CI, 0.406-0.649), presence of symptoms (abdominal symptoms vs. asymptomatic, 95 % CI, 1.146-2.468; stool changes vs. asymptomatic, 95 % CI, 1.070-1.834), and non-TI intubation (95 % CI, 1.040-1.648) were independent predictors of higher PDR. Trend analysis indicated decreasing trend of PDR among non-TI intubation group, 0-5 cm TI intubation group, and > 5 cm TI intubation group (30 % vs. 27 % vs. 24 %, respectively; p < 0.05). TI intubation is necessary to identify small bowel disease among a designated population, but it was not suggested to be routinely performed as part of colonoscopy, owing to limited positive intestinal findings, extra time requirement, and possible PDR worsening.

摘要

结肠镜检查在预防和筛查结直肠癌方面是有效的。在传统结肠镜检查过程中是否需要进行回肠末端(TI)插管,以及它在息肉检出率(PDR)方面是否具有临床益处仍不清楚。这项回顾性研究纳入了2018年7月1日至2019年4月20日期间在我院接受结肠镜检查的患者。记录了阳性发现和TI插管时间。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定与PDR相关的因素。共有1675例完成盲肠插管的结肠镜检查患者,其中994例(59%)进行了TI插管,8例(1%)患有肠道疾病。TI插管的平均时间为40秒(3 - 338秒),从盲肠插管到抵达TI黏膜深部的平均时间为24秒(2 - 118秒)。总体PDR为27%。多因素分析显示,年龄>50岁[95%置信区间(CI)2.837 - 4.590]、男性(95%CI,0.406 - 0.649)、有症状(腹部症状与无症状相比,95%CI,1.146 - 2.468;大便改变与无症状相比,95%CI,1.070 - 1.834)以及未进行TI插管(95%CI,1.040 - 1.648)是PDR较高的独立预测因素。趋势分析表明,未进行TI插管组、0 - 5 cm TI插管组和>5 cm TI插管组的PDR呈下降趋势(分别为30%、27%和24%;p<0.05)。在特定人群中,TI插管对于识别小肠疾病是必要的,但由于肠道阳性发现有限、需要额外时间以及可能使PDR恶化,不建议将其作为结肠镜检查的常规操作。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验