• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

给患有酒精使用障碍的饮酒者给予极高酒精剂量的可行性、耐受性和安全性。

The Feasibility, Tolerability, and Safety of Administering a Very High Alcohol Dose to Drinkers with Alcohol Use Disorder.

机构信息

From the, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, (AV, MH, DF, ACK), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, (DC), University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Dec;44(12):2588-2597. doi: 10.1111/acer.14478. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1111/acer.14478
PMID:33038271
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7725964/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There remains a paucity of research quantifying alcohol's effects in drinkers with alcohol use disorder (AUD), particularly responses to very high alcohol doses (≥0.8 g/kg). As drinkers with AUD frequently engage in very heavy drinking (8 to 10 drinks/occasion), doses of ≤0.8 g/kg may lack ecological validity. The present study examined the feasibility, tolerability, and safety of administering a very high alcohol dose (1.2 g/kg) to non-treatment-seeking AUD participants.

METHODS

Sixty-one young adult AUD drinkers enrolled in the Chicago Social Drinking Project and completed 3 laboratory sessions at which they consumed a beverage with 1.2, 0.8, and 0.0 g/kg alcohol. Physiological responses (vital signs, nausea and vomiting, breath alcohol concentrations [BrAC]) were monitored throughout the sessions. After each session, participants completed a next-day survey of substance use, engagement in risky behaviors, and related consequences.

RESULTS

Overall, the sample demonstrated good compliance with study procedures; 93% of participants adhered to presession alcohol abstinence requirements (indicated by BrAC < 0.003 g/dl), with no participants exhibiting serious alcohol withdrawal symptoms at arrival to study visits. The 1.2 g/kg alcohol dose achieved an expected mean peak BrAC of 0.13 g/dl at 60 minutes after drinking, which was well tolerated; the majority of the sample did not experience nausea (70%) or vomiting (93%), and dose effects on vital signs were not clinically significant. Finally, we demonstrated that the 1.2 g/kg alcohol dose is safe and not associated with postsession consequences, including reduced sleep time, atypical substance use, accidents or injuries, and severe hangovers.

CONCLUSION

Results support the feasibility, tolerability, and safety of administering a very high alcohol dose to young adult drinkers with AUD within the context of a well-validated laboratory alcohol challenge paradigm. Utilizing an alcohol dose more consistent with naturalistic drinking patterns may foster greater ecological validity of laboratory paradigms for persons with moderate to severe AUD.

摘要

介绍

目前,关于酗酒者(AUD)对酒精影响的研究还很少,特别是对非常高的酒精剂量(≥0.8 g/kg)的反应。由于 AUD 患者经常大量饮酒(8 至 10 杯/次),≤0.8 g/kg 的剂量可能缺乏生态有效性。本研究旨在检验向非治疗性 AUD 参与者给予非常高剂量酒精(1.2 g/kg)的可行性、耐受性和安全性。

方法

61 名年轻的 AUD 饮酒者参加了芝加哥社交饮酒计划,并完成了 3 次实验室饮酒实验,他们在实验中分别摄入了含有 1.2、0.8 和 0.0 g/kg 酒精的饮料。在整个实验过程中监测了生理反应(生命体征、恶心和呕吐、呼气酒精浓度 [BrAC])。每次实验后,参与者完成了关于次日物质使用、危险行为和相关后果的调查。

结果

总体而言,该样本对研究程序的依从性良好;93%的参与者遵守了会前酒精禁欲要求(以 BrAC < 0.003 g/dl 表示),没有参与者在研究访问时出现严重的酒精戒断症状。1.2 g/kg 酒精剂量在饮酒后 60 分钟达到预期的平均峰值 BrAC 0.13 g/dl,耐受性良好;大多数样本没有出现恶心(70%)或呕吐(93%),生命体征的剂量效应没有临床意义。最后,我们证明 1.2 g/kg 酒精剂量是安全的,与实验后的后果无关,包括睡眠时间减少、非典型物质使用、事故或伤害以及严重宿醉。

结论

结果支持在经过充分验证的实验室酒精挑战范式中,向 AUD 年轻成年饮酒者给予非常高剂量酒精的可行性、耐受性和安全性。使用与自然饮酒模式更一致的酒精剂量可能会增强实验室范式对中度至重度 AUD 患者的生态有效性。

相似文献

1
The Feasibility, Tolerability, and Safety of Administering a Very High Alcohol Dose to Drinkers with Alcohol Use Disorder.给患有酒精使用障碍的饮酒者给予极高酒精剂量的可行性、耐受性和安全性。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Dec;44(12):2588-2597. doi: 10.1111/acer.14478. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
2
Haven't lost the positive feeling: a dose-response, oral alcohol challenge study in drinkers with alcohol use disorder.仍保持积极感受:酒精使用障碍患者的剂量反应性、口服酒精挑战研究。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Oct;47(11):1892-1900. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01340-2. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
3
Holding your liquor: Comparison of alcohol-induced psychomotor impairment in drinkers with and without alcohol use disorder.酒量:有和无酒精使用障碍的饮酒者酒精所致精神运动损害的比较
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2023 Jun;47(6):1156-1166. doi: 10.1111/acer.15080. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
4
A Prospective 5-Year Re-examination of Alcohol Response in Heavy Drinkers Progressing in Alcohol Use Disorder.对进展为酒精使用障碍的重度饮酒者酒精反应进行的为期5年的前瞻性重新检查。
Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Mar 15;79(6):489-98. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 14.
5
Assessing real-time positive subjective effects of alcohol using high-resolution ecological momentary assessment in risky versus light drinkers.在高风险饮酒者与轻度饮酒者中,使用高分辨率生态瞬时评估法评估酒精的实时积极主观效应。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2023 Aug;47(8):1570-1581. doi: 10.1111/acer.15130. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
6
Acute alcohol response phenotype in heavy social drinkers is robust and reproducible.重度社交饮酒者的急性酒精反应表型是稳定且可重复的。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Mar;38(3):844-52. doi: 10.1111/acer.12280. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
7
Heterogeneous Dose-Response Analyses of Alcohol Abuse and Dependence.酒精滥用和依赖的异质剂量-反应分析。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019 Feb;43(2):299-308. doi: 10.1111/acer.13940. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
8
Alcohol metabolism in hangover sensitive versus hangover resistant social drinkers.宿醉敏感者与宿醉抵抗者的酒精代谢。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Apr 1;185:351-355. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.11.040. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
High-risk social drinkers and heavy drinkers display similar rates of alcohol consumption.高危社交饮酒者和重度饮酒者的饮酒量相似。
Addict Biol. 2020 Mar;25(2):e12734. doi: 10.1111/adb.12734. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
10
Does participation in an alcohol administration study increase risk for excessive drinking?参与酒精给药研究是否会增加过度饮酒的风险?
Alcohol. 2005 Nov;37(3):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2006.02.002.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Alcohol in Groups of Heavy Drinking Young Adults: A Multi-Modal Investigation of Alcohol Responses in a Laboratory Social Setting.重度饮酒青年人群中酒精的影响:在实验室社交环境中对酒精反应的多模式调查。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1177/21677026251333784.
2
Across the spectrum: Acute alcohol responses in young adults with mild, moderate, and severe alcohol use disorder.全面研究:轻度、中度和重度酒精使用障碍的年轻成年人的急性酒精反应
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2025 Jun 1;271:112629. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112629. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
3
High in the Cloud: Alcohol-, Cannabis-, and Co-Use Before and During Remote Research Participation.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Alcohol Cue Reactivity on Subsequent Treatment Outcomes Among Treatment-Seeking Individuals with Alcohol Use Disorder: A Multisite Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Varenicline.酒精线索反应性对酒精使用障碍治疗寻求者后续治疗结局的影响:一项瓦伦尼克林的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Jul;44(7):1431-1443. doi: 10.1111/acer.14352. Epub 2020 May 25.
2
To Infuse or Ingest in Human Laboratory Alcohol Research.在人体实验室酒精研究中注入或摄入。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2020 Apr;44(4):764-776. doi: 10.1111/acer.14305. Epub 2020 Mar 15.
3
Real-Time Mobile Monitoring of Drinking Episodes in Young Adult Heavy Drinkers: Development and Comparative Survey Study.
云端之上:远程研究参与之前及期间的酒精、大麻及共同使用情况
Subst Use Misuse. 2025;60(3):335-344. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2427170. Epub 2024 Dec 15.
4
Haven't lost the positive feeling: a dose-response, oral alcohol challenge study in drinkers with alcohol use disorder.仍保持积极感受:酒精使用障碍患者的剂量反应性、口服酒精挑战研究。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Oct;47(11):1892-1900. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01340-2. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
实时监测青年重度饮酒者饮酒情况:开发与比较研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Nov 20;7(11):e13765. doi: 10.2196/13765.
4
Striatal activity correlates with stimulant-like effects of alcohol in healthy volunteers.纹状体活动与健康志愿者饮酒的兴奋剂样效应相关。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Dec;43(13):2532-2538. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0166-x. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
5
Alcohol intoxication progressively impairs drivers' capacity to detect important environmental stimuli.酒精中毒会逐渐损害驾驶员发现重要环境刺激的能力。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2018 Dec;175:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
6
Differences in the subjective and motivational properties of alcohol across alcohol use severity: application of a novel translational human laboratory paradigm.酒精使用严重程度不同时,酒精在主观和动机属性上的差异:一种新颖的转化人类实验室范式的应用。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Aug;43(9):1891-1899. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0086-9. Epub 2018 May 8.
7
Exogenous ghrelin administration increases alcohol self-administration and modulates brain functional activity in heavy-drinking alcohol-dependent individuals.外源性生长激素释放肽给药增加了重度饮酒酒精依赖个体的酒精自我给药,并调节了大脑的功能活动。
Mol Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;23(10):2029-2038. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.226. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
8
Vulnerability for Alcohol Use Disorder and Rate of Alcohol Consumption.酒精使用障碍的易感性与酒精消费率
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 1;174(11):1094-1101. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16101180. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
9
Differences between treatment-seeking and non-treatment-seeking participants in medication studies for alcoholism: do they matter?酒精中毒药物治疗研究中寻求治疗与未寻求治疗参与者之间的差异:这些差异重要吗?
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2017 Nov;43(6):703-710. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2017.1312423. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
10
Drinking Motives Predict Subjective Effects of Alcohol and Alcohol Wanting and Liking During Laboratory Alcohol Administration: A Mediated Pathway Analysis.饮酒动机预测实验室饮酒过程中酒精的主观效应、对酒精的渴望及喜好:一项中介途径分析
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Oct;40(10):2190-2198. doi: 10.1111/acer.13174. Epub 2016 Aug 16.