Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):639-646. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0605. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
To assess perioperative outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in a real-world scenario and with a focus on demanding patient factors, such as large prostate size, advanced patient age, and anticoagulation therapy (AT). We retrospectively analyzed HoLEP procedures at our institution between 2010 and 2016. After stratification by prostate volume, age, and AT, perioperative and early voiding characteristics were compared. A multivariable regression model was employed to identify predictors of prolonged time of catheterization (defined as being above group's median). The study cohort consisted of 1816 men with a median age of 71 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 66-76), a median prostate volume of 80 mL (IQR: 58-105), and American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 in 618 men (34%). Median time of enucleation and morcellation was 43 minutes (IQR: 31-60) and 10 minutes (IQR: 6-18), respectively. Perioperative blood transfusions were administered in 44 (2.4%) cases, severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3b) occurred in 61 (3.3%) cases. The median time of catheterization was 2 days (IQR: 2-2), with prolonged catheterization occurring in 277 (15%) cases. After adjustment, large prostates (fourth volume quartile [106-280 mL]) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-2.6, = 0.001), therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin bridging regimen (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.4-3.6, = 0.037), low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.0-2.2, = 0.015), and a history of direct oral anticoagulation (OR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2-4.0, = 0.022), but not patient age, were independently associated with prolonged catheterization. We confirm HoLEP as safe and efficient; however, patients with large prostates and patients with a history of AT are at risk of prolonged catheterization.
为了评估钬激光前列腺剜除术(HoLEP)在真实场景中的围手术期结果,并重点关注大前列腺体积、高龄患者和抗凝治疗(AT)等苛刻的患者因素。我们回顾性分析了 2010 年至 2016 年期间我院进行的 HoLEP 手术。根据前列腺体积、年龄和 AT 分层后,比较了围手术期和早期排尿特征。采用多变量回归模型确定导管留置时间延长(定义为超过组中位数)的预测因素。研究队列包括 1816 名年龄中位数为 71 岁(四分位距 [IQR]:66-76)、前列腺体积中位数为 80ml(IQR:58-105)、美国麻醉医师协会评分≥3 的男性。618 名男性(34%)。前列腺剜除和粉碎的中位时间分别为 43 分钟(IQR:31-60)和 10 分钟(IQR:6-18)。44 例(2.4%)患者接受了围手术期输血,61 例(3.3%)患者发生严重术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo 分级≥3b)。导管留置时间中位数为 2 天(IQR:2-2),277 例(15%)患者导管留置时间延长。调整后,大前列腺(第四体积四分位距 [106-280ml])(比值比 [OR]:1.8,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.3-2.6, = 0.001)、低分子肝素桥接治疗方案(OR:2.2,95% CI:1.4-3.6, = 0.037)、低剂量乙酰水杨酸(OR:1.5,95% CI:1.0-2.2, = 0.015)和直接口服抗凝剂(OR:2.3,95% CI:1.2-4.0, = 0.022),但不是患者年龄,与导管留置时间延长独立相关。我们证实 HoLEP 安全有效;然而,大前列腺体积的患者和有 AT 病史的患者有延长导管留置的风险。