• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有小儿脓毒症风险的发热儿童的管理:一项儿科急诊护理的前瞻性研究。

Management of Children With Fever at Risk for Pediatric Sepsis: A Prospective Study in Pediatric Emergency Care.

作者信息

Nijman Ruud G, Jorgensen Rikke, Levin Michael, Herberg Jethro, Maconochie Ian K

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Accident and Emergency, St. Mary's Hospital - Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Section of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2020 Sep 17;8:548154. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.548154. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fped.2020.548154
PMID:33042929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7527403/
Abstract

To study warning signs of serious infections in febrile children presenting to PED, ascertain their risk of having sepsis, and evaluate their management. Prospective observational study. A single pediatric emergency department (PED). Febrile children, aged 1 month-16 years, with >= 1 warning signs of sepsis. Clinical characteristics, including different thresholds for tachycardia and tachypnoea, and their association with (1) delivery of pediatric sepsis 6 (PS6) interventions, (2) final diagnosis of invasive bacterial infection (IBI), (3) the risk for pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission, and (4) death. Forty-one percent of 5,156 febrile children had warning signs of sepsis. 1,606 (34%) children had tachypnoea and 1,907 (39%) children had tachycardia when using APLS threshold values. Using the NICE sepsis guidelines thresholds resulted in 1,512 (32%) children having tachypnoea (kappa 0.56) and 2,769 (57%) children having tachycardia (kappa 0.66). Of 1,628 PED visits spanning 1,551 disease episodes, six children (0.4%) had IBI, with one death (0.06%), corresponding with 256 children requiring escalation of care according to sepsis guideline recommendations for each child with IBI. There were five additional PICU admissions (0.4%). 121 (7%) had intravenous antibiotics in PED; 39 children (2%) had an intravenous fluid bolus, inotrope drugs were started in one child. 440 children (27%) were reviewed by a senior clinician. In 4/11 children with IBI or PICU admission or death, PS6 interventions were delivered within 60 min after arriving. 1,062 (65%) visits had no PS6 interventions. Diagnostic performance of vital signs or sepsis criteria for predicting serious illness yielded a large proportion of false positives. Lactataemia was not associated with giving iv fluid boluses ( = 0.19) or presence of serious bacterial infections ( = 0.128). Many febrile children (41%) present with warning signs for sepsis, with only few of them undergoing investigations or treatment for true sepsis. Children with positive isolates in blood or CSF culture presented in a heterogeneous manner, with varying levels of urgency and severity of illness. Delivery of sepsis care can be improved in only a minority of children with IBI or admitted to PICU.

摘要

为研究儿科急诊(PED)中发热儿童严重感染的警示信号,确定其发生脓毒症的风险,并评估其治疗情况。进行前瞻性观察性研究。选取单一儿科急诊科(PED)。纳入年龄1个月至16岁、具有≥1个脓毒症警示信号的发热儿童。研究临床特征,包括心动过速和呼吸急促的不同阈值,以及它们与以下方面的关联:(1)儿科脓毒症6(PS6)干预措施的实施;(2)侵袭性细菌感染(IBI)的最终诊断;(3)儿科重症监护病房(PICU)收治风险;(4)死亡情况。5156名发热儿童中41%有脓毒症警示信号。采用APLS阈值时,1606名(34%)儿童有呼吸急促,1907名(39%)儿童有心动过速。采用英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)脓毒症指南阈值时,1512名(32%)儿童有呼吸急促(kappa值为0.56),2769名(57%)儿童有心动过速(kappa值为0.66)。在涵盖1551次疾病发作的1628次PED就诊中,6名儿童(0.4%)患有IBI,1名死亡(0.06%),这意味着每例患有IBI的儿童按照脓毒症指南建议有256名儿童需要加强治疗。另有5名儿童(0.4%)被收治入PICU。121名(7%)在PED接受了静脉抗生素治疗;39名儿童(2%)接受了静脉推注补液,1名儿童开始使用血管活性药物。440名儿童(27%)由资深临床医生进行了评估。在11例患有IBI或被收治入PICU或死亡的儿童中,4例在到达后60分钟内实施了PS6干预措施。1062次(65%)就诊未实施PS6干预措施。生命体征或脓毒症标准对预测严重疾病的诊断效能产生了大量假阳性结果。血乳酸水平与给予静脉推注补液(P = 0.19)或严重细菌感染的存在(P = 0.128)无关。许多发热儿童(41%)有脓毒症警示信号,但其中只有少数因真正的脓毒症接受检查或治疗。血培养或脑脊液培养分离出阳性菌株的儿童表现各异,疾病的紧急程度和严重程度各不相同。只有少数患有IBI或被收治入PICU的儿童的脓毒症治疗情况能够得到改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb8/7527403/d0fb13a5306c/fped-08-548154-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb8/7527403/3ce74facd563/fped-08-548154-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb8/7527403/163e23b5ca26/fped-08-548154-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb8/7527403/d0fb13a5306c/fped-08-548154-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb8/7527403/3ce74facd563/fped-08-548154-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb8/7527403/163e23b5ca26/fped-08-548154-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb8/7527403/d0fb13a5306c/fped-08-548154-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Management of Children With Fever at Risk for Pediatric Sepsis: A Prospective Study in Pediatric Emergency Care.有小儿脓毒症风险的发热儿童的管理:一项儿科急诊护理的前瞻性研究。
Front Pediatr. 2020 Sep 17;8:548154. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.548154. eCollection 2020.
2
Heart rate and respiratory rate in predicting risk of serious bacterial infection in febrile children given antipyretics: prospective observational study.在给予解热药的发热儿童中,心率和呼吸率预测严重细菌感染风险:前瞻性观察研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 May;182(5):2205-2214. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04884-7. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
3
Febrile children with comorbidities at the emergency department - a multicentre observational study.急诊科合并症发热儿童 - 一项多中心观察性研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Sep;181(9):3491-3500. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04552-2. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
4
The prevalence and diagnostic utility of systemic inflammatory response syndrome vital signs in a pediatric emergency department.小儿急诊科全身炎症反应综合征生命体征的患病率及诊断效用
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;22(4):381-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12610. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
5
Emergency management of children with severe sepsis in the United Kingdom: the results of the Paediatric Intensive Care Society sepsis audit.英国儿童严重脓毒症的急诊处理:儿科重症监护学会脓毒症审计结果
Arch Dis Child. 2009 May;94(5):348-53. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.153064. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
6
Immunization Status and the Management of Febrile Children in the Pediatric Emergency Department: What Are We Doing?免疫状况和儿科急诊发热儿童的管理:我们在做什么?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2023 Jan 1;39(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002864. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
7
Diagnosis and Treatment of the Febrile Child发热儿童的诊断与治疗
8
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
9
Timing of antibiotics, volume, and vasoactive infusions in children with sepsis admitted to intensive care.入住重症监护病房的脓毒症患儿抗生素、液体量及血管活性药物输注的时机
Crit Care. 2015 Aug 17;19(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1010-x.
10
[Clinical study on sepsis in 2 pediatric intensive care units in Beijing].[北京两家儿科重症监护病房脓毒症的临床研究]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Mar;50(3):178-83.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting sepsis treatment decisions in the paediatric emergency department using machine learning: the AiSEPTRON study.利用机器学习预测儿科急诊科的脓毒症治疗决策:AiSEPTRON研究
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 May 14;9(1):e003273. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003273.
2
Not too sick, not too well: reducing the diagnostic void in pediatric emergency medicine.病情不重不轻:缩小儿科急诊医学中的诊断空白
Pediatr Res. 2024 Nov;96(6):1519-1525. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03598-2. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
3
Integration and validation of host transcript signatures, including a novel 3-transcript tuberculosis signature, to enable one-step multiclass diagnosis of childhood febrile disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomarkers of sepsis: time for a reappraisal.脓毒症的生物标志物:重新评估的时候到了。
Crit Care. 2020 Jun 5;24(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02993-5.
2
Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children.《拯救脓毒症运动:儿童脓毒性休克及脓毒症相关器官功能障碍管理国际指南》
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;21(2):e52-e106. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002198.
3
Biomarkers for Infection in Children: Current Clinical Practice and Future Perspectives.
整合和验证宿主转录本特征,包括一种新的三转录本结核特征,以实现儿童发热性疾病的一步多类诊断。
J Transl Med. 2024 Aug 29;22(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05241-4.
4
Presepsin Levels in Pediatric Patients with Fever and Suspected Sepsis: A Pilot Study in an Emergency Department.发热且疑似脓毒症的儿科患者的前降钙素水平:急诊科的一项初步研究
Children (Basel). 2024 May 15;11(5):594. doi: 10.3390/children11050594.
5
Rapid molecular diagnostic tests fail to PERFORM in febrile children.快速分子诊断测试在发热儿童中未能发挥作用。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Aug 4;32:100707. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100707. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Heart rate and respiratory rate in predicting risk of serious bacterial infection in febrile children given antipyretics: prospective observational study.在给予解热药的发热儿童中,心率和呼吸率预测严重细菌感染风险:前瞻性观察研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 May;182(5):2205-2214. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04884-7. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
7
Integrating Clinical Signs at Presentation and Clinician's Non-analytical Reasoning in Prediction Models for Serious Bacterial Infection in Febrile Children Presenting to Emergency Department.将就诊时的临床体征与临床医生的非分析性推理纳入急诊科发热儿童严重细菌感染预测模型中。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 25;10:786795. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.786795. eCollection 2022.
8
A Novel Framework for Phenotyping Children With Suspected or Confirmed Infection for Future Biomarker Studies.一种用于对疑似或确诊感染儿童进行表型分析以开展未来生物标志物研究的新型框架。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jul 28;9:688272. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.688272. eCollection 2021.
儿童感染的生物标志物:当前临床实践和未来展望。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2019 Jun;38(6S Suppl 1):S7-S13. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002318.
4
Effects of saline or albumin fluid bolus in resuscitation: evidence from re-analysis of the FEAST trial.盐水或白蛋白液复苏的效果:来自 FEAST 试验再分析的证据。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Jul;7(7):581-593. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30114-6. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
5
The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care.人工智能临床医生学习重症监护中脓毒症的最佳治疗策略。
Nat Med. 2018 Nov;24(11):1716-1720. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0213-5. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
6
Association Between the New York Sepsis Care Mandate and In-Hospital Mortality for Pediatric Sepsis.纽约脓毒症护理指令与儿科脓毒症院内死亡率的关联
JAMA. 2018 Jul 24;320(4):358-367. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9071.
7
Identification and treatment of paediatric sepsis: getting the balance right.小儿脓毒症的识别与治疗:把握好平衡
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Dec;103(12):1185-1186. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314865. Epub 2018 May 25.
8
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 Update.拯救脓毒症运动集束治疗:2018年更新版
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):997-1000. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003119.
9
Lactate Level Versus Lactate Clearance for Predicting Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock Defined by Sepsis-3.乳酸水平与乳酸清除率对 Sepsis-3 定义的脓毒性休克患者病死率的预测价值
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):e489-e495. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003030.
10
Association Between Fluid Balance and Outcomes in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.液体平衡与危重症儿童结局的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Mar 1;172(3):257-268. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4540.