Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Norwegian Competence Center for Sleep Disorders, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 14;8:415. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00415. eCollection 2020.
Shift work is associated with several negative health effects. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are unclear, but low-grade inflammation has been suggested to play a role. This project aimed to determine whether levels of immunological biomarkers differ depending on work schedule, self-reported sleep duration, self-reported sleep quality, and presence of shift work disorder (study 1). Furthermore, we aimed to determine whether these biomarkers differ after a night of sleep vs. at the end of a night or a day shift (study 2). In study 1, 390 nurses provided blood samples after a night of sleep with the dried blood spot method. In study 2, a subset of 55 nurses also provided blood samples after a day shift and after a night shift. The following biomarkers were measured: interleukin-1alpha, interleukin-1beta, interleukin-4, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, interleukin-10, interleukin-13, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, interferon-gamma, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Multiple linear regressions with adjustment for age, sex and body mass index (study 1) and ANOVAs with repeated measures (study 2) were conducted. In study 1, neither work schedule, number of night shifts, number of quick returns (<11 h between consecutive shifts), sleep duration, poor sleep quality, nor shift work disorder were systematically associated with most of these biomarkers. Compared with day only work, day-evening work was associated with higher levels of IL-1alpha and IL-13, quick returns were associated with higher levels of IL-1beta and MCP-1, short sleep duration (<6 h) was associated with lower levels of IL-1beta and higher levels of TNF-alpha, and long sleep duration (8+ h) was associated with higher levels of IL-13. In study 2, IL-1beta levels were higher (large effect size) both after a day shift (14% increase) and a night shift (75% increase) compared with levels after a night of sleep. Similarly, TNF-alpha levels were higher (moderate-large effect size) after a day shift (50% increase) compared to after a night of sleep. In contrast, MCP-1 levels were lower (large effect size) both after a day shift (22% decrease) and a night shift (12% decrease) compared with after a night of sleep. We found some indications that shift work influenced immunological biomarkers. The results should be interpreted with caution due to limitations, e.g., related to the sampling procedure and to low levels of biomarkers in the blood samples.
轮班工作与许多负面健康影响有关。潜在的病理生理机制尚不清楚,但低度炎症被认为起作用。本项目旨在确定免疫生物标志物的水平是否因工作时间表、自我报告的睡眠时间、自我报告的睡眠质量以及是否存在轮班工作障碍而有所不同(研究 1)。此外,我们还旨在确定这些生物标志物在一夜睡眠后与在一夜或一天轮班结束时是否有所不同(研究 2)。 在研究 1 中,390 名护士在一夜睡眠后使用干血斑法提供了血液样本。在研究 2 中,55 名护士的一部分也在一天轮班和一夜轮班后提供了血液样本。测量了以下生物标志物:白细胞介素-1α、白细胞介素-1β、白细胞介素-4、白细胞介素-6、白细胞介素-8、白细胞介素-10、白细胞介素-13、单核细胞趋化蛋白-1、干扰素-γ和肿瘤坏死因子-α。进行了年龄、性别和体重指数调整的多元线性回归(研究 1)和重复测量的方差分析(研究 2)。 在研究 1 中,工作时间表、夜班次数、连续班次之间的快速返回次数(<11 小时)、睡眠时间、睡眠质量差或轮班工作障碍均与大多数这些生物标志物没有系统关联。与仅白天工作相比,白天-晚上工作与更高水平的 IL-1α 和 IL-13 相关,快速返回与更高水平的 IL-1β 和 MCP-1 相关,睡眠时间短(<6 小时)与 IL-1β 水平较低和 TNF-α 水平较高相关,而睡眠时间长(8+ 小时)与更高水平的 IL-13 相关。在研究 2 中,与一夜睡眠后的水平相比,白天轮班后(14%增加)和夜间轮班后(75%增加)IL-1β 水平更高(大效应量)。同样,与一夜睡眠后的水平相比,白天轮班后(50%增加)TNF-α 水平更高(中-大效应量)。相比之下,与一夜睡眠后的水平相比,白天轮班后(22%下降)和夜间轮班后(12%下降)MCP-1 水平更低(大效应量)。 我们发现一些迹象表明轮班工作会影响免疫生物标志物。由于采样程序和血液样本中生物标志物水平低等限制,结果应谨慎解释。