Davies Amy Goodwin, Embick David
Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2020;35(3):393-401. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1684528. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
The representation of inflection is controversial: theories of morphological processing range from those that treat all inflectional morphemes as independently represented in memory to those that deny independent representation for any inflectional morphemes. Whereas identity priming for stems and derivational affixes is regularly reported, priming of inflectional affixes is understudied and has produced no clear consensus. This paper reports results from a continuous auditory lexical decision task investigating priming of plural inflectional affixes in English, in plural prime-target pairs such as . Our results show statistically significant priming facilitation for plural primes relative to phonological () and singular () controls. This finding indicates that inflectional affixes, like lexical stems, exhibit identity priming effects. We discuss implications for morphological theory and point to questions for further work addressing which representation(s) produce the priming effect.
形态加工理论的范围从那些将所有词形变化语素视为在记忆中独立表征的理论,到那些否认任何词形变化语素具有独立表征的理论。虽然经常报道词干和派生词缀的相同启动效应,但词形变化词缀的启动效应研究不足,尚未形成明确的共识。本文报告了一项连续听觉词汇判断任务的结果,该任务研究了英语中复数词形变化词缀的启动效应,在诸如……的复数启动-目标对中。我们的结果显示,相对于语音()和单数()控制组,复数启动词具有统计学上显著的启动促进作用。这一发现表明,词形变化词缀与词汇词干一样,表现出相同启动效应。我们讨论了对形态理论的影响,并指出了进一步研究的问题,即哪种表征产生了启动效应。