Kuperman Victor, Estes Zachary, Brysbaert Marc, Warriner Amy Beth
McMaster University, Canada.
Bocconi University, Italy.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1065-1081. doi: 10.1037/a0035669. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
Emotion influences most aspects of cognition and behavior, but emotional factors are conspicuously absent from current models of word recognition. The influence of emotion on word recognition has mostly been reported in prior studies on the automatic vigilance for negative stimuli, but the precise nature of this relationship is unclear. Various models of automatic vigilance have claimed that the effect of valence on response times is categorical, an inverted U, or interactive with arousal. In the present study, we used a sample of 12,658 words and included many lexical and semantic control factors to determine the precise nature of the effects of arousal and valence on word recognition. Converging empirical patterns observed in word-level and trial-level data from lexical decision and naming indicate that valence and arousal exert independent monotonic effects: Negative words are recognized more slowly than positive words, and arousing words are recognized more slowly than calming words. Valence explained about 2% of the variance in word recognition latencies, whereas the effect of arousal was smaller. Valence and arousal do not interact, but both interact with word frequency, such that valence and arousal exert larger effects among low-frequency words than among high-frequency words. These results necessitate a new model of affective word processing whereby the degree of negativity monotonically and independently predicts the speed of responding. This research also demonstrates that incorporating emotional factors, especially valence, improves the performance of models of word recognition.
情绪影响认知和行为的大多数方面,但当前的单词识别模型中明显没有考虑情感因素。情绪对单词识别的影响大多在先前关于对负面刺激的自动警觉性的研究中有所报道,但这种关系的确切性质尚不清楚。各种自动警觉性模型声称,效价对反应时间的影响是分类的、倒U形的,或者与唤醒相互作用。在本研究中,我们使用了12658个单词的样本,并纳入了许多词汇和语义控制因素,以确定唤醒和效价对单词识别影响的确切性质。在词汇判断和命名的单词层面和试验层面数据中观察到的一致实证模式表明,效价和唤醒发挥独立的单调效应:负面单词的识别比正面单词慢,唤醒性单词的识别比平静性单词慢。效价解释了单词识别潜伏期约2%的方差变异,而唤醒的影响较小。效价和唤醒不相互作用,但二者都与词频相互作用,因此效价和唤醒在低频词中比在高频词中产生更大的影响。这些结果需要一个新的情感单词加工模型,即消极程度单调且独立地预测反应速度。这项研究还表明,纳入情感因素,尤其是效价,可提高单词识别模型的性能。