Instituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos IFISC (CSIC-UIB), Campus UIB, 07122, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Center for Computational Simulation, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Brain Topogr. 2021 Jan;34(1):6-18. doi: 10.1007/s10548-020-00799-w. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
In spite of the large attention received by brain activity analyses through functional networks, the effects of uncertainty on such representations have mostly been neglected. We here elaborate the hypothesis that such uncertainty is not just a nuisance, but that on the contrary is condition-dependent. We test this hypothesis by analysing a large set of EEG brain recordings corresponding to control subjects and patients suffering from alcoholism, through the reconstruction of the corresponding Maximum Spanning Trees (MSTs), the assessment of their topological differences, and the comparison of two frequentist and Bayesian reconstruction approaches. A machine learning model demonstrates that the Bayesian reconstruction encodes more information than the frequentist one, and that such additional information is related to the uncertainty of the topological structures. We finally show how the Bayesian approach is more effective in the validation of generative models, over and above the frequentist one, by proposing and disproving two models based on additive noise.
尽管大脑活动分析通过功能网络得到了广泛关注,但不确定性对这些表示的影响大多被忽视了。我们在这里详细阐述了这样一种假设,即这种不确定性不仅仅是一种麻烦,而是与条件有关。我们通过分析一组对应于对照受试者和患有酒精中毒的患者的 EEG 脑记录,通过重建相应的最大生成树(MST)、评估它们的拓扑差异以及比较两种频率和贝叶斯重建方法来验证这一假设。机器学习模型表明,贝叶斯重建比频率重建编码更多的信息,并且这种额外的信息与拓扑结构的不确定性有关。最后,我们通过提出和反驳基于加性噪声的两个模型,展示了贝叶斯方法如何比频率方法更有效地验证生成模型,超出了频率方法。