Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Dec;34(12):e23546. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23546. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIFA) is viewed as a preliminary standard to assess antinuclear antibodies (ANAs). Our aim was to explore ANA positivity rate, titers, and patterns in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD), including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD), compared with healthy controls (HC).
Assess antinuclear antibody titers and patterns were retrospectively identified and compared by IIFA using human epithelial cells (HEp-2) and primate liver tissue substrate according to international consensus in SARD. Serum complement 3 (C3), C4, and immunoglobulin G were compared among subgroups with different ANA titers. The positive predictive values (PPV) for different ANA titers were calculated.
There were a total of 3510 samples, including 2034 SLE, 973 RA, 155 SSc, 309 pSS, and 39 MCTD cases. There was no difference in age between HC and SARD, excluding RA. ANA positivity rate in SARD and HC was 78.7% and 12.2%, respectively. A titer of ≥1:320 revealed a PPV of 84.0% in SARD. SLE patients with ANA titers ≥1:320 had significantly lower levels of C3 and C4. AC-4 (31.2%) was the major pattern in patients with SARD, followed by AC-5 (23.9%) and AC-1 (18.8%). SLE mostly presented with AC-4 (30.3%). Several mixed patterns provided a significant hint for SSc and SLE. The major pattern in HC was AC-2 (12.2%).
Assess antinuclear antibody positivity, titers, and patterns display differences in various SARD, contributing to the classification of SARD.
间接免疫荧光法(IIFA)被视为评估抗核抗体(ANA)的初步标准。我们的目的是探讨系统性自身免疫性风湿病(SARD)患者(包括系统性红斑狼疮[SLE]、类风湿关节炎[RA]、原发性干燥综合征[pSS]、系统性硬皮病[SSc]和混合性结缔组织病[MCTD])的 ANA 阳性率、滴度和模式,并与健康对照组(HC)进行比较。
采用间接免疫荧光法(IIFA)用人上皮细胞(HEp-2)和灵长类动物肝组织底物,根据 SARD 的国际共识,回顾性地确定和比较抗核抗体滴度和模式。根据不同的 ANA 滴度比较各组血清补体 3(C3)、C4 和免疫球蛋白 G。计算不同 ANA 滴度的阳性预测值(PPV)。
共 3510 例样本,包括 2034 例 SLE、973 例 RA、155 例 SSc、309 例 pSS 和 39 例 MCTD。除 RA 外,HC 和 SARD 的年龄无差异。SARD 和 HC 的 ANA 阳性率分别为 78.7%和 12.2%。SARD 中 ANA 滴度≥1:320 的 PPV 为 84.0%。ANA 滴度≥1:320 的 SLE 患者的 C3 和 C4 水平显著降低。AC-4(31.2%)是 SARD 患者的主要模式,其次是 AC-5(23.9%)和 AC-1(18.8%)。SLE 主要表现为 AC-4(30.3%)。几种混合模式为 SSc 和 SLE 提供了重要提示。HC 的主要模式为 AC-2(12.2%)。
评估抗核抗体的阳性率、滴度和模式在各种 SARD 中存在差异,有助于 SARD 的分类。