Yu Han-Hua, Hsieh Pao-Feng, Huang Szu-Wei, Chan Tien-Ming, Tai Pao-Lien, Yang Shih-Ting, Yu Kuang-Hui
Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan.
Biomedicines. 2023 Nov 11;11(11):3027. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11113027.
Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are essential diagnostic markers in systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Among the 30 ANA patterns, homogeneous (AC-1) and dense fine speckled (AC-2) should be focused on owing to their somewhat indistinct presentation in immunofluorescence imaging and distinct correlation with clinical conditions. This study aimed to develop a flowchart to guide discrimination between AC-1 and AC-2 patterns and to re-evaluate ANA samples according to this flowchart to verify its detection ability. We re-evaluated immunofluorescence imaging of 62 ANA blood samples simultaneously subjected to solid-phase assays for autoantibodies against dsDNA, nucleosomes, histones, and DFS70. The results showed statistically significant odd ratios (ORs) of detection of anti-DFS70 using AC-2 after re-evaluation of total samples (OR 101.9, 95% CI 11.7-886.4, -value < 0.001) and subgroup analysis of patients' samples (OR 53.8, 95% CI 5.9-493.6, -value < 0.001). The OR of anti-nucleosome/histone/dsDNA detection using AC-1 in re-evaluated data increased to 5.43 (95% CI 1.00-29.61, -value = 0.05). In the analysis of specific autoantibodies, more than half of the samples with an AC-2 pattern (54.2%) had specific autoantibodies other than anti-DFS70. We conclude that the flowchart for discriminating between AC-1 and AC-2 ANA patterns in this study is a viable practical guide for other laboratories when encountering equivocal ANA results.
抗核抗体(ANA)是系统性自身免疫性风湿疾病中的重要诊断标志物。在30种ANA模式中,均匀型(AC-1)和致密细颗粒型(AC-2)应予以关注,因为它们在免疫荧光成像中的表现有些不清晰,且与临床情况有明显关联。本研究旨在制定一个流程图,以指导AC-1和AC-2模式的鉴别,并根据该流程图重新评估ANA样本,以验证其检测能力。我们对62份ANA血样的免疫荧光成像进行了重新评估,这些血样同时还接受了针对双链DNA、核小体、组蛋白和DFS70的自身抗体的固相检测。结果显示,在对所有样本进行重新评估后,使用AC-2检测抗DFS70的统计学显著比值比(OR)(OR 101.9,95%置信区间11.7 - 886.4,P值<0.001)以及对患者样本进行亚组分析时(OR 53.8,95%置信区间5.9 - 493.6,P值<0.001)均如此。在重新评估的数据中,使用AC-1检测抗核小体/组蛋白/双链DNA的OR增加到5.43(95%置信区间1.00 - 29.61,P值 = 0.05)。在特定自身抗体分析中,超过一半的AC-2模式样本(54.2%)除抗DFS70外还有其他特定自身抗体。我们得出结论,本研究中用于鉴别AC-1和AC-2 ANA模式的流程图,对于其他实验室在遇到ANA结果不明确时是一个可行的实用指南。