• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊柱融合术前和术后使用手机应用程序进行客观活动评估时的患者参与情况。

Patient Participation With a Mobile Phone Application for Objective Activity Assessment Before and After Spinal Fusion.

作者信息

Sprau Annelise C, Basil Gregory, Borowsky Peter, Yoon Jang W, Wang Michael Y

机构信息

Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.

Neurological Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Sep 9;12(9):e10326. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10326.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.10326
PMID:33052287
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7546594/
Abstract

Background  Evolution within spine surgery is driven by a surgeon's desire for expertise and significant improvement in their patients' quality of life. As surgeons move away from using subjective patient-reported outcome (PRO) surveys, there must be an alternative objective metric in its place. Modern iPhone (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA) technology can be used to capture daily activity in a simple, non-user biased manner. These health data can be used to analyze objective functional status in conjunction with PRO surveys to measure surgical outcomes. Methods  Patients who underwent an awake transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) between 2014 and 2018 at our institution were identified. Patients were consented and instructed to download the application "QS Access" (Quantified Self Labs, San Francisco, CA). Following data collection, we analyzed the demographic information of patients who were reached to gauge participation and feasibility of data exportation. Results A total of 177 patients who underwent an awake TLIF at our institution were contacted. Of those who answered, 41 (44.6%) agreed to participate and 51 (55.4%) declined to participate. When comparing those who either participated or declined, there were no significant differences in age (p=0.145), sex (p=0.589), or ethnicity (p=0.686). Conclusion  Our pilot study examined the patient participation in the novel usage of Apple "Health" data, queried from "QS Access" (Quantified Self Labs), to objectively measure relative patient functional status surrounding spinal fusion. We demonstrated that a smartphone-based application was mostly well received by our patient cohort and has the potential to be used as an objective operative metric moving forward.

摘要

背景 脊柱外科的发展是由外科医生对专业技能的追求以及患者生活质量的显著改善所推动的。随着外科医生不再使用主观的患者报告结局(PRO)调查,必须有替代的客观指标取而代之。现代iPhone(苹果公司,加利福尼亚州库比蒂诺)技术可用于以简单、无用户偏差的方式记录日常活动。这些健康数据可与PRO调查结合使用,以分析客观功能状态,从而衡量手术效果。方法 确定2014年至2018年在我们机构接受清醒经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)的患者。患者签署知情同意书并被指示下载“QS Access”应用程序(量化自我实验室,加利福尼亚州旧金山)。在收集数据后,我们分析了成功联系到的患者的人口统计学信息,以评估参与情况和数据导出的可行性。结果 我们机构共联系了177例接受清醒TLIF手术的患者。在回复的患者中,41例(44.6%)同意参与,51例(55.4%)拒绝参与。比较参与和拒绝参与的患者,在年龄(p=0.145)、性别(p=0.589)或种族(p=0.686)方面没有显著差异。结论 我们的初步研究调查了患者对苹果“健康”数据新用途的参与情况,这些数据是从“QS Access”(量化自我实验室)中查询的,以客观测量脊柱融合周围患者的相对功能状态。我们证明,基于智能手机的应用程序在我们的患者群体中大多受到好评,并且有可能在未来用作客观的手术指标。

相似文献

1
Patient Participation With a Mobile Phone Application for Objective Activity Assessment Before and After Spinal Fusion.脊柱融合术前和术后使用手机应用程序进行客观活动评估时的患者参与情况。
Cureus. 2020 Sep 9;12(9):e10326. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10326.
2
Using Smartphone-Based Accelerometer Data to Objectively Assess Outcomes in Spine Surgery.使用基于智能手机的加速度计数据客观评估脊柱手术的结果。
Neurosurgery. 2021 Mar 15;88(4):763-772. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa505.
3
What every spine surgeon should know about transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery for herniated discs.每个脊柱外科医生都应该了解的腰椎间盘突出症经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术。
Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):883-889. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4251-x. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
4
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术:一位外科医生的学习曲线
Spine J. 2014 Aug 1;14(8):1460-5. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.08.045. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
5
Learning curve of a complex surgical technique: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).一种复杂外科技术的学习曲线:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS TLIF)
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct;27(7):E234-40. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000089.
6
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单纯减压治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症的对比研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18722.
7
Modeled cost-effectiveness of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion compared with posterolateral fusion for spondylolisthesis using N(2)QOD data.使用N(2)QOD数据对经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术与后路腰椎融合术治疗腰椎滑脱的成本效益进行建模分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jun;24(6):916-21. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.SPINE15917. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
8
Benefit of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion vs Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Lumbar Spine Disorders: A Propensity-Matched Analysis From the National Neurosurgical Quality and Outcomes Database Registry.经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与腰椎后路外侧融合术治疗腰椎疾病的疗效比较:基于国家神经外科质量与结果数据库登记处的倾向匹配分析
Neurosurgery. 2016 Sep;79(3):397-405. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001118.
9
Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?腰椎手术后1年的手术效果指标能否准确预测2年的预后?
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Dec;25(6):689-696. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.SPINE15476. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
10
Short-term and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: is there a difference?微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的短期和长期疗效:是否存在差异?
Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Aug;35(2):E6. doi: 10.3171/2013.5.FOCUS1377.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Preoperative Walking Speed With 1-Year Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.术前步行速度与股骨髋臼撞击综合征髋关节镜检查术后1年预后的相关性
Sports Health. 2025 Jan 17:19417381241309918. doi: 10.1177/19417381241309918.
2
Association of Daily Step Count With Patient Knowledge, Step Tracking, and Physical Factors in Patients With Spine Pathology.脊柱疾病患者每日步数与患者知识、步数追踪及身体因素的关联
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2024 Mar 7:15598276241238170. doi: 10.1177/15598276241238170.
3
A Scale for Measuring Electronic Patient Engagement Behaviors: Development and Validation.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment and prediction of spine surgery invasiveness with machine learning techniques.运用机器学习技术评估和预测脊柱手术的侵袭性
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jun;121:103796. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103796. Epub 2020 May 16.
2
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for microendoscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.微创手术经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的术后加速康复(ERAS)路径。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;196:106003. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106003. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
3
Why are patients dissatisfied after spine surgery when improvements in disability and pain are clinically meaningful?
一种测量电子患者参与行为的量表:开发与验证
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Apr 25;18:917-929. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S444633. eCollection 2024.
4
The Role of Mobile Health Technology in Perioperative Spinal Care: A Systematic Scoping Review and Narrative Synthesis.移动健康技术在围手术期脊柱护理中的作用:一项系统综述和叙述性综合分析
Cureus. 2024 Feb 15;16(2):e54254. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54254. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Collection of the International Hip Outcome Tool-12 Using a Smartphone Application Format Is Faster and Preferred When Compared With the Paper Version: A Pilot Study of rHip.与纸质版相比,使用智能手机应用程序格式收集国际髋关节结局工具-12更快且更受青睐:一项rHip的初步研究
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug 19;3(5):e1401-e1405. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.06.010. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Using smartphone-based accelerometers to gauge postoperative outcomes in patients with NPH: Implications for ambulatory monitoring.使用基于智能手机的加速度计评估正常压力脑积水患者的术后结果:对动态监测的意义。
Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Sep 13;12:464. doi: 10.25259/SNI_112_2021. eCollection 2021.
为什么脊柱手术后患者仍不满意,尽管其功能障碍和疼痛都有显著改善?
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1535-1543. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
4
The Role of Minimal Access Surgery in the Treatment of Spinal Metastatic Tumors.微创外科手术在脊柱转移性肿瘤治疗中的作用
Global Spine J. 2020 Apr;10(2 Suppl):79S-87S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219895265. Epub 2020 May 28.
5
Robotic Spine Surgery: Current State in Minimally Invasive Surgery.机器人脊柱手术:微创手术的现状
Global Spine J. 2020 Apr;10(2 Suppl):34S-40S. doi: 10.1177/2192568219878131. Epub 2020 May 28.
6
Impact of Dominant Symptom on 12-Month Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery.主导症状对腰椎手术患者 12 个月患者报告结局的影响。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Oct 15;87(5):1037-1045. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa240.
7
Telemedicine in Neurosurgery: Lessons Learned and Transformation of Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic.神经外科的远程医疗:COVID-19 大流行期间的经验教训和护理转型。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Aug;140:e387-e394. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.251. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
8
Scientific View on Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Can Spinal Endoscopy Become a Mainstream Surgical Tool?内镜脊柱外科的科学观点:脊柱内镜能否成为主流手术工具?
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;145:708-711. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.238. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
9
Principles for Managing Patients with Spinal Ailments in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era: What Do We Know So Far? An Evidence-Based, Narrative Review.2019冠状病毒病时代脊柱疾病患者的管理原则:我们目前了解多少?一项基于证据的叙述性综述。
Asian Spine J. 2020 Aug;14(4):572-580. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0248. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
10
Using PROMIS-29 to predict Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores using a national sample of cervical spine surgery patients.使用 PROMIS-29 对全国颈椎手术患者样本进行颈残障指数(NDI)评分预测。
Spine J. 2020 Aug;20(8):1305-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.028. Epub 2020 May 12.