Roest Geoffrey S, Gurney K R, Miller S M, Liang J
School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Carbon Balance Manag. 2020 Oct 14;15(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13021-020-00157-0.
Cities contribute more than 70% of global anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO) emissions and are leading the effort to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through sustainable planning and development. However, urban greenhouse gas mitigation often relies on self-reported emissions estimates that may be incomplete and unverifiable via atmospheric monitoring of GHGs. We present the Hestia Scope 1 fossil fuel CO (FFCO) emissions for the city of Baltimore, Maryland-a gridded annual and hourly emissions data product for 2010 through 2015 (Hestia-Baltimore v1.6). We also compare the Hestia-Baltimore emissions to overlapping Scope 1 FFCO emissions in Baltimore's self-reported inventory for 2014.
The Hestia-Baltimore emissions in 2014 totaled 1487.3 kt C (95% confidence interval of 1158.9-1944.9 kt C), with the largest emissions coming from onroad (34.2% of total city emissions), commercial (19.9%), residential (19.0%), and industrial (11.8%) sectors. Scope 1 electricity production and marine shipping were each generally less than 10% of the city's total emissions. Baltimore's self-reported Scope 1 FFCO emissions included onroad, natural gas consumption in buildings, and some electricity generating facilities within city limits. The self-reported Scope 1 FFCO total of 1182.6 kt C was similar to the sum of matching emission sectors and fuels in Hestia-Baltimore v1.6. However, 20.5% of Hestia-Baltimore's emissions were in sectors and fuels that were not included in the self-reported inventory. Petroleum use in buildings were omitted and all Scope 1 emissions from industrial point sources, marine shipping, nonroad vehicles, rail, and aircraft were categorically excluded.
The omission of petroleum combustion in buildings and categorical exclusions of several sectors resulted in an underestimate of total Scope 1 FFCO emissions in Baltimore's self-reported inventory. Accurate Scope 1 FFCO emissions, along with Scope 2 and 3 emissions, are needed to inform effective urban policymaking for system-wide GHG mitigation. We emphasize the need for comprehensive Scope 1 emissions estimates for emissions verification and measuring progress towards Scope 1 GHG mitigation goals using atmospheric monitoring.
城市排放的人为二氧化碳(CO)占全球总量的70%以上,并且正通过可持续规划和发展引领减少温室气体(GHG)排放的行动。然而,城市温室气体减排往往依赖于自我报告的排放估算,而这些估算可能并不完整,且无法通过对温室气体的大气监测进行验证。我们展示了马里兰州巴尔的摩市的赫斯提亚1类化石燃料CO(FFCO)排放情况——这是一个涵盖2010年至2015年的年度和每小时排放数据的网格化产品(赫斯提亚 - 巴尔的摩v1.6)。我们还将赫斯提亚 - 巴尔的摩的排放与巴尔的摩市2014年自我报告清单中重叠的1类FFCO排放进行了比较。
2014年赫斯提亚 - 巴尔的摩的排放总量为1487.3千吨碳(95%置信区间为1158.9 - 1944.9千吨碳),其中排放量最大的来自道路运输(占城市总排放量的34.2%)、商业(19.9%)、住宅(19.0%)和工业(11.8%)部门。1类电力生产和海运排放通常各自占城市总排放量的不到10%。巴尔的摩市自我报告的1类FFCO排放包括道路运输、建筑物中的天然气消耗以及城市范围内的一些发电设施。自我报告的1类FFCO总量为1182.6千吨碳,与赫斯提亚 - 巴尔的摩v1.6中匹配的排放部门和燃料的总和相似。然而,赫斯提亚 - 巴尔的摩排放的20.5%来自自我报告清单中未包括的部门和燃料。建筑物中的石油使用被遗漏,并且工业点源、海运、非道路车辆、铁路和飞机的所有1类排放都被明确排除。
建筑物中石油燃烧的遗漏以及几个部门的明确排除导致巴尔的摩市自我报告清单中1类FFCO排放总量被低估。准确的1类FFCO排放以及2类和3类排放对于为全系统温室气体减排制定有效的城市政策至关重要。我们强调需要全面的1类排放估算,以便进行排放核查并通过大气监测衡量实现1类温室气体减排目标的进展情况。