• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者样本中自我形象量表(SIS-D)德语版的心理测量特性。

Psychometric properties of the German version of the Self Image Scale (SIS-D) in a sample of cancer patients.

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0240619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240619. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0240619
PMID:33052971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7556474/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A cancer disease can affect the satisfaction with the physical appearance, so that the standardized assessment of the body image is important in cancer patients. The German version of the Self-Image Scale is a self-report measure that uses two subscales to assess appearance satisfaction (self-acceptance) and perceptions of partners' acceptance of their appearance (partner-acceptance). The present study aimed to validate the Self-Image Scale's two-factor structure in a sample of cancer patients with a variety of different diagnoses to further increase its utility.

METHODS

Confirmatory factor analysis methods were used to examine the two-factor model in a sample of cancer patients (N = 278). Scale reliability and validity were then assessed through internal consistency measures and correlations with external criteria such as depressiveness, anxiety, distress, and relationship satisfaction.

RESULTS

The proposed factor structure was supported by the results and the internal consistencies were good with α = .83 for the self-acceptance scale and α = .88 for the partner-acceptance scale while additional correlations with external criteria were observed as expected.

CONCLUSIONS

The results support the use of the German version of the Self-Image Scale in cancer patients in general. Future research directions include validation across further entities of cancer, the in-depth investigation of sex differences, and research in other diseases that might impact body image.

摘要

背景

癌症疾病会影响对身体外观的满意度,因此对癌症患者进行身体形象的标准化评估非常重要。自我形象量表的德文版是一种自我报告的测量工具,使用两个分量表来评估外观满意度(自我接纳)和对伴侣对自己外表的接受程度的感知(伴侣接纳)。本研究旨在通过对患有多种不同诊断的癌症患者的样本进行验证,进一步增加其效用,以验证自我形象量表的两因素结构。

方法

使用验证性因子分析方法对癌症患者样本(N=278)进行检验。然后通过内部一致性测量和与外部标准(如抑郁、焦虑、痛苦和关系满意度)的相关性来评估量表的信度和效度。

结果

结果支持提出的因素结构,自我接纳量表的内部一致性良好,α值为.83,而伴侣接纳量表的α值为.88,同时观察到与外部标准的额外相关性,这与预期相符。

结论

结果支持在一般癌症患者中使用自我形象量表的德文版。未来的研究方向包括在更多的癌症实体中进行验证,深入研究性别差异,以及在可能影响身体形象的其他疾病中进行研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/7556474/4886e4ac14bc/pone.0240619.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/7556474/4886e4ac14bc/pone.0240619.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f02a/7556474/4886e4ac14bc/pone.0240619.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the German version of the Self Image Scale (SIS-D) in a sample of cancer patients.癌症患者样本中自我形象量表(SIS-D)德语版的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0240619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240619. eCollection 2020.
2
Psychometric properties of the German version of the Self-Image Scale (SIS-D).自我形象量表(SIS-D)德语版的心理测量学特性。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 16;15(3):e0230331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230331. eCollection 2020.
3
Measuring body image during pregnancy: psychometric properties and validity of a German translation of the Body Image in Pregnancy Scale (BIPS-G).孕期体像测量:德国版孕期体像量表(BIPS-G)的心理测量学特性和效度。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jul 12;19(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2386-4.
4
The Self-Efficacy to Communicate about Sex and Intimacy (SECSI) scale: psychometric assessment in women treated for cancer.性与亲密关系沟通自我效能量表(SECSI):癌症治疗女性的心理测量评估。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Mar;28(3):1449-1457. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04963-2. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
5
Body image in men with prostate or laryngeal cancer and their female partners.前列腺癌或喉癌男性患者及其女性伴侣的身体意象
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2020 Sep;66(3):287-301. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2020.66.3.287.
6
Body image in patients with different types of cancer.癌症患者的身体意象。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0260602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260602. eCollection 2021.
7
German version of the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire - Appearance Scales (MBSRQ-AS): confirmatory factor analysis and validation.《多维身体-自我关系问卷-外貌量表》(MBSRQ-AS)德文版:验证性因素分析与效度检验
Body Image. 2014 Jun;11(3):191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
8
Psychometric properties of the Dresden Body Image Questionnaire: A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis across sex and age in a Dutch non-clinical sample.德累斯顿身体意象问卷的心理测量特性:荷兰非临床样本中跨性别和年龄的多组验证性因素分析
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 26;12(7):e0181908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181908. eCollection 2017.
9
Validation of the German version of the Bodily Distress Syndrome 25 checklist in a representative German population sample.验证身体痛苦综合征 25 清单的德语版本在代表性的德国人群样本中的有效性。
J Psychosom Res. 2020 May;132:109991. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109991. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
10
The Spanish version of the Body Image Scale (S-BIS): psychometric properties in a sample of breast and gynaecological cancer patients.身体意象量表的西班牙语版本(S-BIS):乳腺癌和妇科癌症患者样本中的心理测量特性
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Feb;23(2):473-81. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2383-0. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Body image in patients with different types of cancer.癌症患者的身体意象。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0260602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260602. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the German version of the Self-Image Scale (SIS-D).自我形象量表(SIS-D)德语版的心理测量学特性。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 16;15(3):e0230331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230331. eCollection 2020.
2
The German version of the Quality of Marriage Index: Psychometric properties in a representative sample and population-based norms.《婚姻质量指数德语版》:在代表性样本和基于人群的常模中的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 28;14(2):e0212758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212758. eCollection 2019.
3
Relationships between body image, sexual satisfaction, and relationship quality in romantic couples.
浪漫伴侣中的体像、性满足与关系质量之间的关系。
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Jun;32(4):466-474. doi: 10.1037/fam0000407. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
4
Body image assessment in oncology: an update review.肿瘤学中的身体形象评估:最新综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Mar;25(3):1019-1029. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3538-y. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
5
Is body dissatisfaction changing across time? A cross-temporal meta-analysis.身体不满是否随时间变化?一项跨时间的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Mar;143(3):293-320. doi: 10.1037/bul0000081. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
6
Improving the Factor Structure of Psychological Scales: The Expanded Format as an Alternative to the Likert Scale Format.改善心理量表的因子结构:扩展格式作为李克特量表格式的替代方案。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Jun;76(3):357-386. doi: 10.1177/0013164415596421. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
7
Body image and quality of life of breast cancer patients: influence of timing and stage of breast reconstruction.乳腺癌患者的身体意象与生活质量:乳房重建时机和阶段的影响
Psychooncology. 2016 Sep;25(9):1106-12. doi: 10.1002/pon.3952. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
8
Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.有序数据的验证性因子分析:稳健极大似然法与对角加权最小二乘法的比较
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):936-49. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.
9
Body image and sexual function in women after treatment for anal and rectal cancer.肛管直肠癌女性患者治疗后的身体形象与性功能
Psychooncology. 2016 Mar;25(3):316-23. doi: 10.1002/pon.3847. Epub 2015 May 14.
10
Body image in cancer survivors: a systematic review of case-control studies.癌症幸存者的身体意象:病例对照研究的系统评价
J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Jun;9(2):339-48. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0414-y. Epub 2014 Dec 2.