First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 'Laiko' General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020 Oct 1;59(Suppl4):iv79-iv89. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa435.
There have been major advances in the management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) with the introduction of effective biologic agents targeting TNF and IL-17A. Clinicians now have more choice but, despite treatment recommendations, are still faced with significant uncertainty when deciding on the optimal treatment strategy for an individual patient in clinical practice. Management of axSpA typically requires both non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions. NSAIDs remain the first line drug therapies for axSpA with proven efficacy for symptomatic management but uncertainty remains regarding their optimal long-term use relating to radiographic progression and safety in axSpA. To-date there are no head-to-head trials of biologics in axSpA. Clinicians need to consider other factors, including extra-articular manifestations, comorbidities, safety and radiographic progression when deciding on which biologic to recommend for an individual patient. This article will explore the evidence relating to these factors and highlight areas of unmet need.
在治疗中轴型脊柱关节炎(axSpA)方面,随着针对 TNF 和 IL-17A 的有效生物制剂的出现,已经取得了重大进展。临床医生现在有了更多的选择,但尽管有治疗建议,在决定个体患者的最佳治疗策略时,他们在临床实践中仍然面临着很大的不确定性。axSpA 的治疗通常需要非药物和药物干预。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)仍然是 axSpA 的一线药物治疗方法,其对症状管理具有明确的疗效,但在 axSpA 中关于其最佳长期使用与放射学进展和安全性的问题仍存在不确定性。迄今为止,axSpA 中还没有生物制剂的头对头试验。临床医生在决定为个体患者推荐哪种生物制剂时,需要考虑其他因素,包括关节外表现、合并症、安全性和放射学进展。本文将探讨与这些因素相关的证据,并强调未满足的需求领域。