Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Apr 6;190(4):681-695. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa226.
The use of digital technologies to conduct large-scale research with limited interaction (i.e., no in-person contact) and objective endpoints (i.e., biological testing) has significant potential for the field of epidemiology, but limited research to date has been published on the successes and challenges of such approaches. We analyzed data from a cohort study of sexual minority men across the United States, collected using digital strategies during a 10-month period from 2017 to 2018. Overall, 113,874 individuals were screened, of whom 26,000 were invited to the study, 10,691 joined the study, and 7,957 completed all enrollment steps, including return of a human immunodeficiency virus-negative sample. We examined group differences in completion of the steps towards enrollment to inform future research and found significant differences according to several factors, including age and race. This study adds to prior work to provide further proof-of-concept for this limited-interaction, technology-mediated methodology, highlighting some of its strengths and challenges, including rapid access to more diverse populations but also potential for bias due to differential enrollment. This method has strong promise, and future implementation research is needed to better understand the roles of burden, privacy, access, and compensation, to enhance representativeness and generalizability of the data generated.
利用数字技术进行大规模研究,限制互动(即无面对面接触)并采用客观终点(即生物检测),在流行病学领域具有巨大的潜力,但迄今为止,关于此类方法的成功和挑战的研究有限。我们分析了一项在美国进行的性少数男性队列研究的数据,该研究使用数字策略在 2017 年至 2018 年期间进行了 10 个月的收集。总体而言,有 113874 人接受了筛选,其中 26000 人被邀请参加研究,10691 人加入了研究,7957 人完成了所有入组步骤,包括返回人类免疫缺陷病毒阴性样本。我们检查了入组步骤完成情况的组间差异,以为未来的研究提供信息,并根据包括年龄和种族在内的几个因素发现了显著差异。这项研究增加了之前的工作,进一步证明了这种有限互动、技术介导的方法的可行性,突出了其一些优势和挑战,包括快速接触更多样化的人群,但也可能因不同的入组而产生偏差。这种方法具有很大的潜力,需要进一步的实施研究来更好地理解负担、隐私、获取和补偿的作用,以增强所产生数据的代表性和普遍性。