• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Walking School Bus Programs: Implementation Factors, Implementation Outcomes, and Student Outcomes, 2017-2018.步行校车项目:2017-2018 年的实施因素、实施结果和学生成果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Oct 15;17:E127. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200061.
2
Implementation contextual factors related to community-based active travel to school interventions: a mixed methods interview study.与基于社区的步行或骑自行车上学干预措施相关的实施背景因素:一项混合方法访谈研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Aug 26;2(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00198-7.
3
Evaluation of a walking school bus program: a cluster randomized controlled trial.步行校车项目评估:一项整群随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 May 10;21(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01602-w.
4
The FLEX study school-based physical activity programs - measurement and evaluation of implementation.FLEX研究:基于学校的体育活动项目——实施情况的测量与评估
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 16;19(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6335-3.
5
Barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and sustainment of obesity prevention interventions in schoolchildren- a DEDIPAC case study.儿童肥胖预防干预措施在学校中采用、实施和持续的障碍和促进因素——DEDIPAC 案例研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 15;19(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6368-7.
6
A process evaluation of the walking in ScHools (WISH) study using the RE-AIM framework.一项使用RE-AIM框架对学校步行(WISH)研究进行的过程评估。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21434-y.
7
Implementation of School Remote Drop-off Walking Programs: Results from Qualitative Interviews.学校远程下车步行计划的实施:定性访谈结果
J Transp Health. 2021 Sep;22. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101126. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
8
Public engagement to refine a whole-school intervention to promote adolescent mental health.公众参与完善全校性干预措施以促进青少年心理健康。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2024 Dec 4:1-22. doi: 10.3310/JWGT4863.
9
Predictors of healthier and more sustainable school travel mode profiles among Hong Kong adolescents.预测香港青少年更健康、更可持续的学校出行模式特征的因素。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 May 28;16(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0807-4.
10
Correlates of walking to school and implications for public policies: survey results from parents of elementary school children in Austin, Texas.步行上学的相关因素及其对公共政策的启示:得克萨斯州奥斯汀市小学生家长的调查结果
J Public Health Policy. 2009;30 Suppl 1:S177-202. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2008.51.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and possibilities when doing research on active school travel interventions in a school setting - a non-randomized pilot study assessing feasibility of an evaluation design.在学校环境中开展积极的校园出行干预研究时面临的挑战与机遇——一项评估评价设计可行性的非随机试点研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 23;25(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21445-9.
2
A Tale of Two Cities: Unpacking the Success and Failure of School Street Interventions in Two Canadian Cities.双城记:剖析两所加拿大城市的街道干预措施的成败
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 14;19(18):11555. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811555.
3
Implementation contextual factors related to community-based active travel to school interventions: a mixed methods interview study.与基于社区的步行或骑自行车上学干预措施相关的实施背景因素:一项混合方法访谈研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Aug 26;2(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00198-7.
4
Implementation of School Remote Drop-off Walking Programs: Results from Qualitative Interviews.学校远程下车步行计划的实施:定性访谈结果
J Transp Health. 2021 Sep;22. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101126. Epub 2021 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementation, context and complexity.实施、背景与复杂性
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 19;11(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0506-3.
2
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.理解实施理论、模型和框架。
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.
3
Multistate evaluation of safe routes to school programs.对学校安全路线项目的多州评估。
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jan-Feb;28(3 Suppl):S89-96. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130430-QUAN-210.
4
Estimated energy expenditures for school-based policies and active living.基于学校的政策和积极生活方式的估计能量消耗。
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.017.
5
Associations between active school transport and physical activity, body composition, and cardiovascular fitness: a systematic review of 68 studies.积极的学校交通方式与身体活动、身体成分和心血管健康之间的关联:对68项研究的系统综述
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Jan;11(1):206-27. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2011-0345. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
6
Walking school bus programs in U.S. public elementary schools.美国公立小学的“步行校车”项目。
J Phys Act Health. 2013 Jul;10(5):641-5. doi: 10.1123/jpah.10.5.641. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
7
Cycling to school is associated with lower BMI and lower odds of being overweight or obese in a large population-based study of Danish adolescents.在一项针对丹麦青少年的大型基于人群的研究中,骑自行车上学与较低的 BMI 和较低的超重或肥胖几率相关。
J Phys Act Health. 2012 Jul;9(5):617-25. doi: 10.1123/jpah.9.5.617.
8
Physical activity and performance at school: a systematic review of the literature including a methodological quality assessment.学校中的体育活动与表现:一项包括方法学质量评估的文献系统综述
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012 Jan;166(1):49-55. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.716.
9
The walking school bus and children's physical activity: a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial.步行校车与儿童身体活动:一项试点群组随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2011 Sep;128(3):e537-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3486. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
10
Exercise, brain, and cognition across the life span.运动、大脑与认知的毕生发展
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Nov;111(5):1505-13. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00210.2011. Epub 2011 Apr 28.

步行校车项目:2017-2018 年的实施因素、实施结果和学生成果。

Walking School Bus Programs: Implementation Factors, Implementation Outcomes, and Student Outcomes, 2017-2018.

机构信息

Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, 610 E. 22nd St, Kansas City, MO 64113. Email:

Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Oct 15;17:E127. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200061.

DOI:10.5888/pcd17.200061
PMID:33059796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7587300/
Abstract

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES

Walking school bus programs increase children's physical activity through active travel to school; however, research to inform large-scale implementation of such programs is limited. We investigated contextual factors, implementation outcomes, and student outcomes in existing walking school bus programs in the United States and internationally.

INTERVENTION APPROACH

Walking school bus programs involve a group of children walking to school together with an adult leader. On the trip to school, these adults provide social support, address potential traffic and interpersonal safety, and serve as role models to the children while children increase their physical activity levels.

EVALUATION METHODS

We conducted surveys with existing walking school bus programs identified through internet searches, referrals, and relevant email listservs. Leaders from 184 programs that operated at least 1 trip per week completed the survey. We used regression analyses to compare differences in contextual factors by area income and location, associations between contextual factors and implementation outcomes, and associations between implementation outcomes and student outcomes.

RESULTS

Walking school bus programs in low-income communities had more route leaders and engaged in more active travel to school-related activities of being sustained than those in higher income. Programs that had no external funding, multiple route leaders, and coordination by a school or district staff member (as opposed to a parent) had greater student participation than other programs. Providing more trips than other programs per week was associated with reduced tardiness, reduced bullying, and improved neighborhood walkability. The greatest barriers to implementation were recruiting and maintaining students and identifying and maintaining route leaders.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH

Walking school bus programs can be implemented successfully in many contexts using various models. The involvement of several people in leadership roles is critical for sustainability. Evidence-based implementation strategies that overcome barriers can improve reach, implementation, and sustainability of walking school bus programs and can increase children's physical activity.

摘要

目的和目标

步行校车计划通过积极上学的方式增加儿童的身体活动;然而,关于此类计划的大规模实施的研究有限。我们在美国和国际上调查了现有的步行校车计划的背景因素、实施结果和学生结果。

干预方法

步行校车计划涉及一群孩子与一名成人领队一起步行上学。在上学的路上,这些成年人提供社会支持,解决潜在的交通和人际安全问题,并为孩子树立榜样,同时孩子提高他们的身体活动水平。

评估方法

我们通过互联网搜索、推荐和相关电子邮件列表,对现有的步行校车计划进行了调查。每周至少进行一次旅行的 184 个计划的领导人完成了调查。我们使用回归分析比较了不同地区收入和位置的背景因素差异,以及背景因素与实施结果之间的关联,以及实施结果与学生结果之间的关联。

结果

低收入社区的步行校车计划比高收入社区的计划有更多的路线领导人和更积极的上学相关活动,如持续进行。没有外部资金、有多个路线领导人和由学校或地区工作人员协调(而不是家长)的计划比其他计划的学生参与度更高。与其他计划相比,每周提供更多的旅行与减少迟到、减少欺凌和改善邻里步行性有关。实施的最大障碍是招募和维持学生以及识别和维持路线领导。

对公共卫生的影响

步行校车计划可以在许多背景下使用各种模式成功实施。几个人在领导角色中的参与对于可持续性至关重要。克服障碍的循证实施策略可以提高步行校车计划的覆盖范围、实施和可持续性,并增加儿童的身体活动。