Koester MacKenzie, Bejarano Carolina M, Davis Ann M, Brownson Ross C, Kerner Jon, Sallis James F, Steel Chelsea, Carlson Jordan A
Center for Children's Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition, Children's Mercy Kansas City and University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Clinical Child Psychology Program, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Aug 26;2(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00198-7.
Active travel to school contributes to multiple physical and psychosocial benefits for youth, yet population rates of active travel to school are alarmingly low in the USA and many other countries. Though walking school bus interventions are effective for increasing rates of active travel to school and children's overall physical activity, uptake of such interventions has been low. The objective of this study was to conduct a mixed methods implementation evaluation to identify contextual factors that serve as barriers and facilitators among existing walking school bus programs.
Semi-structured interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) were conducted with leaders of low-sustainability (n = 9) and high-sustainability (n = 11) programs across the USA. A combination of quantitative (CFIR-based) coding and inductive thematic analysis was used. The CFIR-based ratings were compared between the low- and high-sustainability programs and themes, subthemes, and exemplary quotes were provided to summarize the thematic analysis.
In both the low- and high-sustainability programs, three of the 15 constructs assessed were commonly rated as positive (i.e., favorable for supporting implementation): student/family needs and resources, implementation climate, and planning. Three constructs were more often rated as positive in the high-sustainability programs: organizational incentives and rewards, engaging students and parents, and reflecting and evaluating. Three constructs were more often rated as positive in the low-sustainability programs: student/family needs and resources - built environment, available resources, and access to knowledge and information. Four themes emerged from the thematic analysis: planning considerations, ongoing coordination considerations, resources and supports, and benefits.
Engagement of students, parents, and community members were among the factors that emerged across the quantitative and qualitative analyses as most critical for supporting walking school bus program implementation. The information provided by program leaders can help in the selection of implementation strategies that overcome known barriers for increasing the long-term success of community-based physical activity interventions such as the walking school bus.
积极步行上学对青少年的身体和心理社会多方面有益,但在美国和许多其他国家,积极步行上学的人口比例低得惊人。尽管步行校车干预措施对提高积极步行上学率和儿童总体身体活动量有效,但此类干预措施的采用率一直很低。本研究的目的是进行一项混合方法实施评估,以确定现有步行校车项目中作为障碍和促进因素的背景因素。
在美国,对低可持续性项目(n = 9)和高可持续性项目(n = 11)的负责人进行了以实施研究综合框架(CFIR)为指导的半结构化访谈。采用了定量(基于CFIR)编码和归纳主题分析相结合的方法。比较了低可持续性项目和高可持续性项目基于CFIR的评分,并提供主题、子主题和示例引语以总结主题分析。
在低可持续性项目和高可持续性项目中,所评估的15个结构中有3个通常被评为积极(即有利于支持实施):学生/家庭需求和资源、实施氛围和规划。在高可持续性项目中,有3个结构更常被评为积极:组织激励和奖励、吸引学生和家长以及反思和评估。在低可持续性项目中,有3个结构更常被评为积极:学生/家庭需求和资源 - 建成环境、可用资源以及获取知识和信息。主题分析产生了四个主题:规划考虑因素、持续协调考虑因素、资源和支持以及益处。
学生、家长和社区成员的参与是定量和定性分析中出现的对支持步行校车项目实施最为关键的因素之一。项目负责人提供的信息有助于选择实施策略,克服已知障碍,以提高基于社区的身体活动干预措施(如步行校车)的长期成功率。