• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

步行校车项目评估:一项整群随机对照试验。

Evaluation of a walking school bus program: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA, 92182, USA.

Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, 1920 Terry Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 May 10;21(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01602-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-024-01602-w
PMID:38730407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11083767/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a walking school bus intervention on children's active commuting to school.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in Houston, Texas (Year 1) and Seattle, Washington (Years 2-4) from 2012 to 2016. The study had a two-arm, cluster randomized design comparing the intervention (walking school bus and education materials) to the control (education materials) over one school year October/November - May/June). Twenty-two schools that served lower income families participated. Outcomes included percentage of days students' active commuting to school (primary, measured via survey) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA, measured via accelerometry). Follow-up took place in May or June. We used linear mixed-effects models to estimate the association between the intervention and outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Total sample was 418 students [M=9.2 (SD = 0.9) years; 46% female], 197 (47%) in the intervention group. The intervention group showed a significant increase compared with the control group over time in percentage of days active commuting (β = 9.04; 95% CI: 1.10, 16.98; p = 0.015) and MVPA minutes/day (β = 4.31; 95% CI: 0.70, 7.91; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support implementation of walking school bus programs that are inclusive of school-age children from lower income families to support active commuting to school and improve physical activity.

TRAIL REGISTRATION

This RCT is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01626807).

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨步行校车干预对儿童上下学积极出行的影响。

方法

我们于 2012 年至 2016 年在德克萨斯州休斯顿(第 1 年)和华盛顿州西雅图(第 2-4 年)进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT)。该研究采用两臂、集群随机设计,将干预措施(步行校车和教育材料)与对照组(教育材料)进行比较,为期一学年(10 月/11 月至 5 月/6 月)。有 22 所服务于低收入家庭的学校参与了研究。结果包括学生上下学积极出行的天数百分比(主要通过调查测量)和中等到剧烈的身体活动(MVPA,通过加速度计测量)。随访于 5 月或 6 月进行。我们使用线性混合效应模型来估计干预措施与感兴趣的结果之间的关联。

结果

总样本为 418 名学生[M=9.2(SD=0.9)岁;46%女性],干预组 197 名(47%)。与对照组相比,干预组在积极出行的天数百分比(β=9.04;95%CI:1.10,16.98;p=0.015)和 MVPA 分钟/天(β=4.31;95%CI:0.70,7.91;p=0.02)方面随着时间的推移呈现出显著的增加。

结论

这些发现支持实施包容性更强的步行校车项目,以支持来自低收入家庭的学龄儿童积极上下学出行,并提高身体活动水平。

试验注册

这项 RCT 在美国临床试验注册中心(NCT01626807)注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43c/11083767/dd9550ceb54a/12966_2024_1602_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43c/11083767/dd9550ceb54a/12966_2024_1602_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f43c/11083767/dd9550ceb54a/12966_2024_1602_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a walking school bus program: a cluster randomized controlled trial.步行校车项目评估:一项整群随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 May 10;21(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01602-w.
2
The walking school bus and children's physical activity: a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial.步行校车与儿童身体活动:一项试点群组随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2011 Sep;128(3):e537-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3486. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
3
Pilot evaluation of a walking school bus program in a low-income, urban community.在一个低收入城市社区对步行校车项目进行的试点评估。
BMC Public Health. 2009 May 4;9:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-122.
4
Study protocol: the Fueling Learning through Exercise (FLEX) study - a randomized controlled trial of the impact of school-based physical activity programs on children's physical activity, cognitive function, and academic achievement.研究方案:通过运动促进学习(FLEX)研究——一项关于校内体育活动项目对儿童身体活动、认知功能和学业成绩影响的随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):1078. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3719-0.
5
A Walking School Bus program: impact on physical activity in elementary school children in Columbia, Missouri.步行校车项目:对密苏里州哥伦比亚市小学生身体活动的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5 Suppl 4):S384-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.009.
6
The Fueling Learning Through Exercise Study Cluster RCT: Impact on Children's Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity.通过运动促进学习的研究群组 RCT:对儿童中等到剧烈身体活动的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jun;60(6):e239-e249. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
7
The impact of school uniforms on primary school student's physical activity at school: outcomes of a cluster randomized controlled trial.校服对小学生在校体育活动的影响:一项整群随机对照试验的结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jan 23;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01084-0.
8
An Intervention to Increase Students' Physical Activity: A 2-Year Pilot Study.一项增加学生身体活动的干预措施:为期两年的试点研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jul;55(1):e1-e10. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
9
An RCT to Facilitate Implementation of School Practices Known to Increase Physical Activity.一项促进增加身体活动的学校实践实施的 RCT。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):818-828. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
10
Walking School Bus Programs: Implementation Factors, Implementation Outcomes, and Student Outcomes, 2017-2018.步行校车项目:2017-2018 年的实施因素、实施结果和学生成果。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Oct 15;17:E127. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200061.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Walking School Bus Programs on Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectations.步行校车项目对自我效能感和结果预期的影响。
J Phys Act Health. 2021 May 26;18(7):858-862. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2020-0453. Print 2021 Jul 1.
2
School Walkability Index: Application of Environmental Audit Tool and GIS.学校步行适宜性指数:环境审计工具与地理信息系统的应用
J Transp Health. 2020 Sep;18. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2020.100880. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
U.S. active school travel in 2017: Prevalence and correlates.2017年美国学生主动参与的上学出行情况:患病率及相关因素。
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Dec 10;17:101024. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.101024. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Parent Perceptions on a Walking School Bus Program Among Low-Income Families: A Qualitative Study.家长对低收入家庭步行校车项目的看法:一项定性研究。
J Phys Act Health. 2019 Nov 1;16(11):1047-1053. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0637. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
5
Interventions promoting active transport to school in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.促进儿童主动上学的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:232-241. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.030. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
6
Report Card Grades on the Physical Activity of Children and Youth Comparing 30 Very High Human Development Index Countries.报告卡成绩对儿童和青少年身体活动的比较 30 个非常高人类发展指数国家。
J Phys Act Health. 2018 Nov 1;15(S2):S298-S314. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0431.
7
Prevalence of children walking to school and related barriers-United States, 2017.儿童步行上学的流行率及相关障碍-美国,2017 年。
Prev Med. 2019 Jan;118:191-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
8
Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport - an update and new findings on health equity.建成环境对身体活动和主动出行影响的系统文献综述——健康公平性的更新与新发现
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Nov 16;14(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9.
9
Diet, physical activity and behavioural interventions for the treatment of overweight or obese children from the age of 6 to 11 years.6至11岁超重或肥胖儿童治疗中的饮食、身体活动及行为干预措施
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6(6):CD012651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012651.
10
Disparities in Pedestrian Streetscape Environments by Income and Race/Ethnicity.不同收入及种族/族裔群体在步行街景观环境方面的差异。
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Dec;2:206-216. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 20.