• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别临终患者,少即是多:临终时共同决策的诊断框架。

Recognizing the Dying Patient, When Less Could be More: A Diagnostic Framework for Shared Decision-Making at the End of Life.

作者信息

Kalsi Dilraj, Ward Joel, Lee Regent, Wee Bee, Fulford Kenneth Wm, Handa Ashok

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Dilraj Kalsi and Joel Ward are joint first authors.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2020 Aug;7(4):621-628. doi: 10.1177/2374373519869153. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1177/2374373519869153
PMID:33062887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7534127/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recognizing dying patients is crucial to produce outcomes that are satisfactory to patients, their families, and clinicians.

AIM

Earlier discussion of and shared decision-making around dying to improve these outcomes.

DESIGN

In this study, we interviewed 16 senior clinicians to develop summaries of palliative care in 4 key specialties: Cardiology, Vascular Surgery, Emergency General Surgery, and Intensive Care.

SETTING

Oxford University Hospitals.

RESULTS

Based on themes common to our 4 clinical areas, we developed a novel diagnostic framework to support shared palliative decision-making that can be summarized as follows: 1) Is the acute pathology reversible? 2) What is the patient's physiological reserve? 3) What is important to the patient? Will they be fit enough for discharge for a reasonable length of time?

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that education using this framework in the medical school and postgraduate curricula would significantly improve recognition of dying patients. This would serve to stimulate earlier conversations, more shared decision-making, and ultimately better outcomes in palliative care and patient experience.

摘要

背景

识别临终患者对于产生让患者、其家属及临床医生都满意的结果至关重要。

目的

更早地围绕临终进行讨论并共同决策,以改善这些结果。

设计

在本研究中,我们采访了16位资深临床医生,以制定4个关键专科(心脏病学、血管外科、普通急诊外科和重症监护)的姑息治疗总结。

地点

牛津大学医院。

结果

基于我们4个临床领域共有的主题,我们开发了一个新颖的诊断框架,以支持共同的姑息治疗决策,可总结如下:1)急性病变是否可逆?2)患者的生理储备如何?3)对患者来说什么是重要的?他们是否足够健康以出院一段合理的时间?

结论

我们认为,在医学院校和研究生课程中使用此框架进行教育将显著提高对临终患者的识别。这将有助于激发更早的对话、更多的共同决策,并最终在姑息治疗和患者体验方面取得更好的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40c/7534127/6540700f2911/10.1177_2374373519869153-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40c/7534127/335dca834c1d/10.1177_2374373519869153-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40c/7534127/6540700f2911/10.1177_2374373519869153-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40c/7534127/335dca834c1d/10.1177_2374373519869153-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f40c/7534127/6540700f2911/10.1177_2374373519869153-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Recognizing the Dying Patient, When Less Could be More: A Diagnostic Framework for Shared Decision-Making at the End of Life.识别临终患者,少即是多:临终时共同决策的诊断框架。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Aug;7(4):621-628. doi: 10.1177/2374373519869153. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
2
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
4
Care of the dying in Australia's busiest hospital: benefits of palliative care consultation and methods to enhance access.澳大利亚最繁忙医院的临终关怀护理:姑息治疗咨询的益处和增加途径的方法。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Jul;13(7):855-60. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0339.
5
Tracheostomy Decision-making Communication among Patients Receiving Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation.长期机械通气患者的气管切开术决策沟通。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):848-856. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202009-1217OC.
6
A grounded theory study: Exploring health care professionals decision making when managing end stage heart failure care.扎根理论研究:探索医疗保健专业人员在管理终末期心力衰竭护理时的决策。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Jul;77(7):3142-3155. doi: 10.1111/jan.14852. Epub 2021 May 15.
7
A Framework to Improve Surgeon Communication in High-Stakes Surgical Decisions: Best Case/Worst Case.在高风险手术决策中改善外科医生沟通的框架:最佳情况/最差情况
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jun 1;152(6):531-538. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5674.
8
Brief training of student clinicians in shared decision making: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.对学生临床医生进行共享决策的简短培训:一项单盲随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jun;29(6):844-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2765-5. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
9
Dying in the hospital setting: A systematic review of quantitative studies identifying the elements of end-of-life care that patients and their families rank as being most important.在医院环境中离世:对定量研究的系统评价,确定患者及其家属认为最重要的临终关怀要素。
Palliat Med. 2015 Oct;29(9):774-96. doi: 10.1177/0269216315583032. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
10
[A position paper on end of life shared between those who believe and those who don't believe: a dialogue is possible].[一份由信者与不信者共同分享的关于生命尽头的立场文件:对话是可行的]
Recenti Prog Med. 2015 Nov;106(11):535-7. doi: 10.1701/2074.22482.

引用本文的文献

1
Mortality Conversations Between Male Veterans and Their Providers Prior to Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation.男性退伍军人及其提供者在下肢血运重建术前行死亡相关讨论的研究
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 May;92:313-322. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.042. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
2
Establishing the Competency Development and Talent Cultivation Strategies for Physician-Patient Shared Decision-Making Competency Based on the IAA-NRM Approach.基于IAA-NRM方法建立医患共同决策能力的能力发展与人才培养策略
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Sep 23;10(10):1844. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10101844.
3
End-of-Life Experiences for Cancer Patients Dying in Hospital with COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
Elbow Room for Best Practice? Montgomery, Patients' values, and Balanced Decision-Making in Person-Centred Clinical Care.最佳实践的空间?蒙哥马利、患者价值观与以患者为中心的临床护理中的平衡决策
Med Law Rev. 2017 Nov 1;25(4):582-603. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwx029.
2
Phase angle for prognostication of survival in patients with advanced cancer: preliminary findings.相位角预测晚期癌症患者生存预后:初步研究结果。
Cancer. 2014 Jul 15;120(14):2207-14. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28624. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
3
Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit.
新冠肺炎疫情期间在医院死亡的癌症患者的临终体验
J Patient Exp. 2022 Jan 28;9:23743735221074171. doi: 10.1177/23743735221074171. eCollection 2022.
英国国家心脏骤停审核中院内心脏骤停的发生率和结局。
Resuscitation. 2014 Aug;85(8):987-92. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
4
Patient, carer and professional perspectives on barriers and facilitators to quality care in advanced heart failure.患者、护理人员及专业人士对晚期心力衰竭优质护理的障碍与促进因素的看法。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 27;9(3):e93288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093288. eCollection 2014.
5
Imminence of death among hospital inpatients: Prevalent cohort study.医院住院患者的死亡紧迫性:现患队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jun;28(6):474-479. doi: 10.1177/0269216314526443.
6
The accuracy of probabilistic versus temporal clinician prediction of survival for patients with advanced cancer: a preliminary report.概率预测与临床医生时间预测对晚期癌症患者生存的准确性:初步报告。
Oncologist. 2011;16(11):1642-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0173. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
7
Development of prognosis in palliative care study (PiPS) predictor models to improve prognostication in advanced cancer: prospective cohort study.姑息治疗研究预后(PiPS)预测模型的开发,以改善晚期癌症的预后:前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2011 Aug 25;343:d4920. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4920.
8
Shared decision-making in palliative care: a systematic mixed studies review using narrative synthesis.舒缓医疗中的共同决策:一项使用叙述性综合方法的系统混合研究综述。
Palliat Med. 2011 Apr;25(3):242-61. doi: 10.1177/0269216310389348. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
9
Time to get it right: are preferences for place of death more stable than we think?是时候做对这件事了:对死亡地点的偏好是否比我们想象的更稳定?
Palliat Med. 2010 Apr;24(3):352-3. doi: 10.1177/0269216309360489. Epub 2010 Feb 9.
10
The comparative palliative care needs of those with heart failure and cancer patients.心力衰竭患者和癌症患者的姑息治疗需求比较。
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2009 Dec;3(4):241-6. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0b013e328332e808.