Vandewalle H, Pérès G, Monod H
Sports Med. 1987 Jul-Aug;4(4):268-89. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198704040-00004.
Anaerobic tests are divided into tests measuring anaerobic power and anaerobic capacity. Anaerobic power tests include force-velocity tests, vertical jump tests, staircase tests, and cycle ergometer tests. The values of maximal anaerobic power obtained with these different protocols are different but generally well correlated. Differences between tests include factors such as whether average power or instantaneous power is measured, active muscle mass is the same in all the protocols, the legs act simultaneously or successively, maximal power is measured at the very beginning of exercise or after several seconds, inertia of the devices and body segments are taken into account. Force-velocity tests have the advantage of enabling the estimation of the force and velocity components of power, which is not possible with tests such as a staircase test, a vertical jump, the Wingate test and other long-duration cycle ergometer protocols. Maximal anaerobic capacity tests are subdivided into maximal oxygen debt test, ergometric tests (all-out tests and constant load tests), measurement of oxygen deficit during a constant load test and measurement of peak blood lactate. The measurement of the maximal oxygen debt is not valid and reliable enough to be used as an anaerobic capacity test. The aerobic metabolism involvement during anaerobic capacity tests, and the ignorance of the mechanical efficiency, limit the validity of the ergometric tests which are only based on the measurement of work. The amount of work performed during the Wingate test depends probably on glycolytic and aerobic power as well as anaerobic capacity. The fatigue index (power decrease) of the all-out tests is not reliable and depends probably on aerobic power as well as the fast-twich fibre percentage. Reliability of the constant load tests has seldom been studied and has been found to be rather low. In theory, the measure of the oxygen deficit during a constant load test is more valid than the other tests but its reliability is unknown. The validity and reliability of postexercise blood lactate as a test of maximal anaerobic capacity are probably not better than that of the current erogmetric tests. The choice of an anaerobic test depends on the aims and subjects of a study and its practicability within a testing session.
无氧测试分为测量无氧功率和无氧能力的测试。无氧功率测试包括力-速度测试、垂直跳跃测试、楼梯测试和自行车测力计测试。通过这些不同方案获得的最大无氧功率值各不相同,但通常具有良好的相关性。测试之间的差异包括以下因素:测量的是平均功率还是瞬时功率、所有方案中的活动肌肉质量是否相同、双腿是同时还是相继发力、最大功率是在运动开始时还是几秒后测量、是否考虑了设备和身体节段的惯性。力-速度测试的优点是能够估计功率的力和速度分量,而楼梯测试、垂直跳跃测试、温盖特测试和其他长时间自行车测力计方案等测试则无法做到这一点。最大无氧能力测试可细分为最大氧债测试、测力计测试(全力测试和恒定负荷测试)、恒定负荷测试期间的氧亏测量以及血乳酸峰值测量。最大氧债的测量作为无氧能力测试不够有效和可靠。无氧能力测试期间有氧代谢的参与以及对机械效率的忽视,限制了仅基于功的测量的测力计测试的有效性。温盖特测试期间完成的功的量可能取决于糖酵解和有氧功率以及无氧能力。全力测试的疲劳指数(功率下降)不可靠,可能取决于有氧功率以及快肌纤维百分比。恒定负荷测试的可靠性很少被研究,并且发现相当低。理论上,恒定负荷测试期间氧亏的测量比其他测试更有效,但其可靠性未知。运动后血乳酸作为最大无氧能力测试的有效性和可靠性可能并不比当前的测力计测试更好。无氧测试的选择取决于研究的目的和对象以及在测试期间的实用性。