• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种测定短跑过程中无氧能量消耗的实验室方法。

A laboratory method for determination of anaerobic energy expenditure during sprinting.

作者信息

Thomson J M, Garvie K J

出版信息

Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1981 Mar;6(1):21-6.

PMID:7226429
Abstract

Highly trained sprinters, marathon runners and untrained male control subjects were studied during treadmill sprinting. After confirming a workload which elicited exhaustion in just over a minute (mean time to exh. = 64.6 +/- 2.5 sec.), each subject performed sprints of 15, 30, 45 and 60 seconds duration in order that their energy expenditure could be segmented per 15-sec. of sprinting time. During every sprint, O2 consumption was recorded by closed-circuit spirometry. Following each sprint, serial 30-sec. venous blood samples were drawn in order to determine the peak lactate concentration. Energy expenditure was therefore determined as follows: i) aerobic energy from increments in O2 uptake, expressed in Kcal; ii) lactacid energy from increments in peak lactate, with the difference between peaks utilized to calculate the anaerobic glycolytic contribution to that 15-sec. segment, expressed in Kcal according to Margaria; iii) alactacid energy, expended over the initial 15-sec. segments, from the difference between the total energy requirement per 15-sec. less the measured aerobic plus the lactacid contributions. The sprinters expended the greatest (p less than .05) anaerobic energy (46.2 +/- 5.1 Kcal) when compared to either the marathoners (31.6 +/- 5.7 Kcal) or controls (33.0 +/- 1.6 Kcal). The athletic groups demonstrated superior alactacid energy (sprinters = 21.4 +/- 4.4 Kcal; marathoners = 15.8 +/- 2.3 Kcal), both expending a substantial amount of energy from this source (20%) past 30-sec. In contrast, over the initial 30-sec. of sprinting, the control subjects had depleted their alactacid energy (12.2 +/- 3.3 Kcal). Only minor differences were observed in aerobic energy expenditure between the three subject groups throughout the sprint to exhaustion.

摘要

在跑步机短跑过程中,对训练有素的短跑运动员、马拉松运动员和未经训练的男性对照受试者进行了研究。在确定了一个在略超过一分钟(平均呼气时间 = 64.6 +/- 2.5秒)内导致疲劳的工作量后,每个受试者进行了持续15、30、45和60秒的短跑,以便按每15秒的短跑时间对他们的能量消耗进行细分。在每次短跑期间,通过闭路肺量计记录氧气消耗量。每次短跑后,抽取连续30秒的静脉血样以确定乳酸峰值浓度。因此,能量消耗的确定如下:i)来自氧气摄取增量的有氧能量,以千卡表示;ii)来自乳酸峰值增量的乳酸能,利用峰值之间的差异来计算该15秒时间段内无氧糖酵解的贡献,根据马尔加里亚法以千卡表示;iii)非乳酸能,在最初的15秒时间段内消耗,通过每15秒总能量需求减去测得的有氧和乳酸贡献之间的差异得出。与马拉松运动员(31.6 +/- 5.7千卡)或对照组(33.0 +/- 1.6千卡)相比,短跑运动员消耗的无氧能量最大(p <.05)(46.2 +/- 5.1千卡)。运动组表现出更高的非乳酸能(短跑运动员 = 21.4 +/- 4.4千卡;马拉松运动员 = 15.8 +/- 2.3千卡),在30秒后两者都从该来源消耗了大量能量(20%)。相比之下,在短跑的最初30秒内,对照受试者的非乳酸能已经耗尽(12.2 +/- 3.3千卡)。在整个短跑至疲劳过程中,三个受试者组之间的有氧能量消耗仅观察到微小差异。

相似文献

1
A laboratory method for determination of anaerobic energy expenditure during sprinting.一种测定短跑过程中无氧能量消耗的实验室方法。
Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1981 Mar;6(1):21-6.
2
Time course of anaerobic and aerobic energy expenditure during short-term exhaustive running in athletes.运动员短期力竭性跑步过程中无氧和有氧能量消耗的时间进程。
Int J Sports Med. 1995 Nov;16(8):522-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-973048.
3
Prediction of anaerobic capacity: a performance test employing an optimal exercise stress.无氧能力的预测:一项采用最佳运动应激的性能测试。
Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1981 Mar;6(1):16-20.
4
31P-MRS characterization of sprint and endurance trained athletes.短跑和耐力训练运动员的31P磁共振波谱特征分析
Int J Sports Med. 2003 Apr;24(3):183-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39085.
5
The maximally accumulated oxygen deficit as an indicator of anaerobic capacity.最大累积氧亏缺作为无氧能力的一个指标。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 May;23(5):618-24.
6
Anaerobic performance in middle and long distance runners.中长跑运动员的无氧运动能力
Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1981 Sep;6(3):109-13.
7
[Energy metabolism and characteristics of muscle during anaerobic exercise].[无氧运动期间的能量代谢与肌肉特征]
Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi. 1998 Jul;73(4):379-88.
8
Recovery energy expenditure for steady state exercise in runners and nonexercisers.跑步者和非运动者稳态运动后的恢复能量消耗。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986 Apr;18(2):205-10.
9
Aerobic and anaerobic contribution to Wingate test performance in sprint and middle-distance runners.有氧和无氧因素对短跑和中长跑运动员温盖特测试表现的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;70(1):58-65. doi: 10.1007/BF00601809.
10
Peak oxygen deficit predicts sprint and middle-distance track performance.最大氧亏可预测短跑和中距离径赛成绩。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Sep;26(9):1174-80.

引用本文的文献

1
A laboratory test for the examination of alactic running performance.乳酸跑运动能力的实验室检测
J Sports Sci Med. 2005 Dec 1;4(4):572-82. eCollection 2005 Dec.
2
A new method for the evaluation of anaerobic running power in athletes.一种评估运动员无氧跑步能力的新方法。
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993;66(2):97-101. doi: 10.1007/BF01427048.
3
Maximal shuttle running over 40 m as a measure of anaerobic performance.40米最大往返跑作为无氧运动能力的一项指标。
Br J Sports Med. 1993 Dec;27(4):228-32. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.27.4.228.
4
Influence of training status on maximal accumulated oxygen deficit during all-out cycle exercise.训练状态对全力骑行运动中最大累积氧亏的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1994;69(4):321-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00392038.
5
Measurement of anaerobic work capacities in humans.人体无氧工作能力的测量。
Sports Med. 1995 Jan;19(1):32-42. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199519010-00003.
6
Aerobic and anaerobic contribution to Wingate test performance in sprint and middle-distance runners.有氧和无氧因素对短跑和中长跑运动员温盖特测试表现的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;70(1):58-65. doi: 10.1007/BF00601809.
7
Assessment of anaerobic capacity in runners.跑步者无氧能力的评估。
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1983;52(1):42-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00429023.
8
Blood lactate and glycerol after 400-m and 3,000-m runs in sprint and long distance runners.短跑和长跑运动员在进行400米和3000米跑步后的血乳酸和甘油水平。
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1984;53(3):213-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00776592.
9
Standard anaerobic exercise tests.标准厌氧运动测试。
Sports Med. 1987 Jul-Aug;4(4):268-89. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198704040-00004.