• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性西酞普兰对健康志愿者自我参照情绪加工和社会认知的影响。

Effect of acute citalopram on self-referential emotional processing and social cognition in healthy volunteers.

作者信息

Hobbs Catherine, Murphy Susannah E, Wright Lucy, Carson James, Assche Indra Van, O'Brien Jessica, Oyesanya Mayowa, Sui Jie, Munafò Marcus R, Kessler David, Harmer Catherine J, Button Katherine S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, UK.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, and NHS Foundation Trust, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

BJPsych Open. 2020 Oct 19;6(6):e124. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.107.

DOI:10.1192/bjo.2020.107
PMID:33070796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7576669/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression is characterised by negative views of the self. Antidepressant treatment may remediate negative self-schema through increasing processing of positive information about the self. Changes in affective processing during social interactions may increase expression of prosocial behaviours, improving interpersonal communications.

AIMS

To examine whether acute administration of citalopram is associated with an increase in positive affective learning biases about the self and prosocial behaviour.

METHOD

Healthy volunteers (n = 41) were randomised to either an acute 20 mg dose of citalopram or matched placebo in a between-subjects double-blind design. Participants completed computer-based cognitive tasks designed to measure referential affective processing, social cognition and expression of prosocial behaviours.

RESULTS

Participants administered citalopram made more cooperative choices than those administered placebo in a prisoner's dilemma task (β = 20%, 95% CI: 2%, 37%). Exploratory analyses indicated that participants administered citalopram showed a positive bias when learning social evaluations about a friend (β = 4.06, 95% CI: 0.88, 7.24), but not about the self or a stranger. Similarly, exploratory analyses found evidence of increased recall of positive words and reduced recall of negative words about others (β = 2.41, 95% CI: 0.89, 3.93), but not the self, in the citalopram group.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants administered citalopram showed greater prosocial behaviours, increased positive recall and increased positive learning of social evaluations towards others. The increase in positive affective bias and prosocial behaviours towards others may, at least partially, be a mechanism of antidepressant effect. However, we found no evidence that citalopram influenced self-referential processing.

摘要

背景

抑郁症的特点是对自我持负面看法。抗抑郁治疗可能通过增加对自我积极信息的处理来纠正负面自我图式。社交互动中情感处理的变化可能会增加亲社会行为的表现,改善人际沟通。

目的

研究西酞普兰的急性给药是否与对自我的积极情感学习偏差和亲社会行为的增加有关。

方法

41名健康志愿者在受试者间双盲设计中被随机分为急性服用20毫克西酞普兰组或匹配的安慰剂组。参与者完成了旨在测量参照性情感处理、社会认知和亲社会行为表现的计算机化认知任务。

结果

在囚徒困境任务中,服用西酞普兰的参与者比服用安慰剂的参与者做出了更多合作选择(β = 20%,95%置信区间:2%,37%)。探索性分析表明,服用西酞普兰的参与者在学习关于朋友的社会评价时表现出积极偏差(β = 4.06,95%置信区间:0.88,7.24),但在学习关于自我或陌生人的社会评价时没有。同样,探索性分析发现,西酞普兰组中存在对他人积极词汇回忆增加和消极词汇回忆减少的证据(β = 2.41,95%置信区间:0.89,3.93),但对自我没有。

结论

服用西酞普兰的参与者表现出更大的亲社会行为、积极回忆增加以及对他人社会评价的积极学习增加。对他人的积极情感偏差和亲社会行为的增加可能至少部分是抗抑郁作用的一种机制。然而,我们没有发现西酞普兰影响自我参照处理的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf1/7576669/04c7991ee45f/S2056472420001076_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf1/7576669/bcf7c166ca01/S2056472420001076_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf1/7576669/00149b22b1da/S2056472420001076_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf1/7576669/5b40110de889/S2056472420001076_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf1/7576669/04c7991ee45f/S2056472420001076_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf1/7576669/bcf7c166ca01/S2056472420001076_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf1/7576669/00149b22b1da/S2056472420001076_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf1/7576669/5b40110de889/S2056472420001076_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf1/7576669/04c7991ee45f/S2056472420001076_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of acute citalopram on self-referential emotional processing and social cognition in healthy volunteers.急性西酞普兰对健康志愿者自我参照情绪加工和社会认知的影响。
BJPsych Open. 2020 Oct 19;6(6):e124. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.107.
2
Short-term escitalopram treatment normalizes aberrant self-referential processing in major depressive disorder.短期依地普仑治疗可使重度抑郁症患者异常的自我参照加工正常化。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Aug 15;236:222-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.096. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
3
Relationship between change in social evaluation learning and mood in early antidepressant treatment: A prospective cohort study in primary care.社会评价学习变化与早期抗抑郁治疗中情绪的关系:初级保健中的前瞻性队列研究。
J Psychopharmacol. 2023 Mar;37(3):303-312. doi: 10.1177/02698811221116928. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
4
Recall bias during adolescence: Gender differences and associations with depressive symptoms.青春期回忆偏倚:性别差异与抑郁症状的关联。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:299-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.133. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
5
Neuropsychological markers of antidepressant action: a secondary analysis of the ANTLER randomised controlled trial.抗抑郁作用的神经心理学标志物:ANTLER随机对照试验的二次分析
Psychol Med. 2023 Oct;53(14):6592-6599. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722003981. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
6
Social inference and social anxiety: evidence of a fear-congruent self-referential learning bias.社会推理和社交焦虑:恐惧一致的自我参照学习偏差的证据。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;43(4):1082-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 May 26.
7
Effects of being watched on self-referential processing, self-awareness and prosocial behaviour.被观察对自我参照加工、自我意识和亲社会行为的影响。
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Nov;76:102830. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102830.
8
Depression risk and electrocortical reactivity during self-referential emotional processing in 8 to 14 year-old girls.8至14岁女孩自我参照情绪加工过程中的抑郁风险与皮质电反应性
J Abnorm Psychol. 2016 Jul;125(5):607-19. doi: 10.1037/abn0000173. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
Negative evaluation bias for positive self-referential information in borderline personality disorder.边缘型人格障碍中对积极自我参照信息的负面评价偏差。
PLoS One. 2015 Jan 22;10(1):e0117083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117083. eCollection 2015.
10
Self-referential processing in depressed adolescents: A high-density event-related potential study.抑郁青少年的自我参照加工:一项高密度事件相关电位研究。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):233-45. doi: 10.1037/abn0000023. Epub 2015 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Could antidepressants increase mood and immunity at the same time?抗抑郁药能同时提升情绪和免疫力吗?
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 12;16:1340179. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1340179. eCollection 2025.
2
Relationship between change in social evaluation learning and mood in early antidepressant treatment: A prospective cohort study in primary care.社会评价学习变化与早期抗抑郁治疗中情绪的关系:初级保健中的前瞻性队列研究。
J Psychopharmacol. 2023 Mar;37(3):303-312. doi: 10.1177/02698811221116928. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
3
An Experimental Medicine Investigation of the Effects of Subacute Pramipexole Treatment on Emotional Information Processing in Healthy Volunteers.

本文引用的文献

1
Inhibitory control of positive and negative information and adolescent depressive symptoms: a population-based cohort study.正性和负性信息的抑制控制与青少年抑郁症状:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Psychol Med. 2022 Apr;52(5):853-863. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720002469. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
2
Cognitive neuropsychological theory of antidepressant action: a modern-day approach to depression and its treatment.抗抑郁药作用的认知神经心理学理论:一种现代的抑郁症及其治疗方法。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 May;238(5):1265-1278. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05448-0. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
3
Referential focus moderates depression-linked attentional avoidance of positive information.
一项关于普拉克索亚急性治疗对健康志愿者情绪信息处理影响的实验医学研究。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Aug 14;14(8):800. doi: 10.3390/ph14080800.
4
Cognition in mood disorders.情绪障碍中的认知
BJPsych Open. 2020 Dec 14;7(1):e16. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.149.
参照焦点调节与抑郁相关的对积极信息的注意回避。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jun;93:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
4
Self-Other Agreement and Metaperception Accuracy Across the Big Five: Examining the Roles of Depression and Self-Esteem.大五人格特质中自我-他人一致性和元感知准确性:考察抑郁和自尊的作用。
J Pers. 2018 Apr;86(2):296-307. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12313. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
5
Acute anxiety and social inference: An experimental manipulation with 7.5% carbon dioxide inhalation.急性焦虑与社会推理:一项吸入7.5%二氧化碳的实验性操作
J Psychopharmacol. 2016 Oct;30(10):1036-46. doi: 10.1177/0269881116653105. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
6
Negative mood disrupts self- and reward-biases in perceptual matching.消极情绪会扰乱知觉匹配中的自我偏向和奖励偏向。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(7):1438-48. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1122069.
7
Cognitive distortions mediate depression and affective response to social acceptance and rejection.认知扭曲介导了抑郁以及对社会接纳和拒绝的情感反应。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:792-799. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
8
Dissociating biases towards the self and positive emotion.区分对自我的偏见和积极情绪。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Jun;70(6):1011-1022. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1101477. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
9
Fear of negative evaluation biases social evaluation inference: evidence from a probabilistic learning task.对负面评价的恐惧会使社会评价推理产生偏差:来自概率学习任务的证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 8;10(4):e0119456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119456. eCollection 2015.
10
Affective bias and current, past and future adolescent depression: a familial high risk study.情感偏差与青少年当前、过去及未来的抑郁:一项家族高风险研究。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 15;174:265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.046. Epub 2014 Nov 29.