Kim Kihun, Kim Jungwon
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2020 Sep 1;32:e30. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2020.32.e30. eCollection 2020.
It is important to identify the causal relationship between occupational exposure and the disease in the area of compensation because most cancers have long latent period. This review presents the principles that should be considered when evaluating the work-relatedness. We reviewed reports on occupational cancers published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, National Toxicology Program, Environmental Protection Agency, European Union, which are the world's most prestigious organizations. In addition, we reviewed relevant papers and books published in Korea. The process is conducted in the order of cancer diagnosis, exposure assessment for carcinogens, and work-relatedness assessment. The probability of causation is determined stochastically rather than deterministically. There is no absolute standard for accreditation criteria and results may vary according to expert opinions and in each country or organization. Revealing the causal relationship of occupational cancers is a difficult process owing to inconsistency in relevant epidemiological studies, lack of well-established biological mechanisms, loss of objective occupational historical data, and other complexity of individual cases. Causation is unclear in many cases. Nevertheless, the data should be reviewed in detail for each case suspected of work-related cancers, and an assessment should be made through valid and plausible logic and literature evidences.
在赔偿领域确定职业暴露与疾病之间的因果关系很重要,因为大多数癌症都有很长的潜伏期。本综述介绍了评估与工作相关性时应考虑的原则。我们查阅了世界上最具声望的组织——国际癌症研究机构、美国政府工业卫生学家会议、国家毒理学计划、环境保护局、欧盟发表的关于职业性癌症的报告。此外,我们还查阅了韩国发表的相关论文和书籍。该过程按癌症诊断、致癌物暴露评估和与工作相关性评估的顺序进行。因果关系的概率是随机确定的,而非确定性的。认证标准没有绝对标准,结果可能因专家意见以及每个国家或组织的不同而有所差异。由于相关流行病学研究不一致、缺乏完善的生物学机制、客观职业历史数据缺失以及个别病例的其他复杂性,揭示职业性癌症的因果关系是一个困难的过程。在许多情况下,因果关系并不明确。然而,对于每一个疑似与工作相关癌症的病例,都应详细审查数据,并通过有效的、合理的逻辑和文献证据进行评估。