School of Health Sciences HES-SO Valais/Wallis University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland Visp Switzerland.
Division of Applied Research & Development in Nursing Bern University of Applied Sciences Bern Switzerland.
Nurs Open. 2020 Aug 26;7(6):1997-2008. doi: 10.1002/nop2.593. eCollection 2020 Nov.
To culturally adapt and translate the (EBP-B) and the (EBP-I), explore the psychometric properties of their validated German versions and compare results with those of the original scales.
Cross-sectional descriptive study.
The study was conducted on a sample of 131 Registered Nurses in a Swiss German hospital. Internal consistency was rated using Cronbach's alpha. Principal component analysis using varimax rotation was used to determine construct validity. The study was undertaken in accordance with the STROBE-checklist in Appendix S1.
German versions of the EBP-B and EBP-I showed good reliability. Their Cronbach alphas showed lower values than those of the original scales. Principal component analysis showed medium-to-high factor loading. Principal component analyses using varimax rotations of the EBP-B's 16 items and the EBP-I's 17 items resulted in four-factor and five-factor solutions, respectively.
文化调适和翻译实证为本护理(EBP-B)和实证为本护理信念(EBP-I),探索其经验证的德文版本的心理测量学特性,并将结果与原始量表进行比较。
横断面描述性研究。
该研究在瑞士德语医院的 131 名注册护士样本中进行。使用 Cronbach's alpha 评估内部一致性。使用方差极大旋转的主成分分析来确定结构有效性。该研究符合附录 S1 中的 STROBE 清单。
EBP-B 和 EBP-I 的德文版本显示出良好的可靠性。它们的 Cronbach 阿尔法值低于原始量表。主成分分析显示中等到高度的因子负荷。使用方差极大旋转对 EBP-B 的 16 个项目和 EBP-I 的 17 个项目进行主成分分析,分别得出四因子和五因子解决方案。