• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)/阿片类激动剂联合治疗项目中优化丙型肝炎病毒治疗

Optimizing Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Treatment in a US Colocated HCV/Opioid Agonist Therapy Program.

作者信息

Habchi Jackie, Thomas Aurielle M, Sprecht-Walsh Sophie, Arias Elenita, Bratberg Jeffrey, Hurley Linda, Hart Susan, Taylor Lynn E

机构信息

CODAC Behavioral Healthcare, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

University of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 13;7(10):ofaa310. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa310. eCollection 2020 Oct.

DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofaa310
PMID:33072802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7550646/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A minority of patients with opioid use disorder are treated for hepatitis C virus infection (HCV). While colocated HCV and opioid agonist therapy (OAT) along with harm reduction can facilitate prevention and cascade to cure, there are few real-world examples of such embedded care models in the United States in the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) era.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review to determine sustained virologic response (SVR) and reinfection rates during the first 5-year period of DAA availability among individuals tested and treated on-site at Rhode Island's only nonprofit methadone maintenance program.

RESULTS

Of 275 who initiated DAAs, the mean age (range) was 43 (22-71) years, 34.5% were female, 57.5% had genotype 1a, 23.3% had cirrhosis, and 92% were Medicaid recipients. SVR was 85.0% (232/273), while modified intent-to-treat SVR was 93.2% (232/249); 17 patients did not achieve SVR, 2 awaited SVR 12 weeks post-end-of-treatment, and 24 were lost to follow-up. Thirty reinfections were identified over 375.5 person-years of follow-up (rate, 7.99/100 person-years). The median time to first reinfection (interquartile range) was 128 (85.25-202.5) days. Before July 1, 2018, 72 patients accessed DAAs over 3.7 years; after Medicaid DAA restrictions were lifted, 109 patients accessed DAAs over 1.3 years. The Prior Authorization (PA) process requires many steps, differing across 11 RI insurers, taking 45-120 minutes per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

DAA treatment was effective among a marginalized population in an urban colocated OAT/HCV program. Removing DAA restrictions facilitates treatment initiation. The PA process remains a modifiable barrier to expanding capacity in the United States.

摘要

背景

少数阿片类药物使用障碍患者会接受丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染治疗。虽然丙型肝炎病毒和阿片类激动剂疗法(OAT)同地开展并结合减少伤害措施有助于预防并实现治愈,但在美国直接抗病毒药物(DAA)时代,很少有这种嵌入式护理模式的实际案例。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性病历审查,以确定在罗德岛唯一的非营利性美沙酮维持治疗项目中接受现场检测和治疗的个体在DAA上市的头5年期间的持续病毒学应答(SVR)和再感染率。

结果

在275名开始使用DAA的患者中,平均年龄(范围)为43(22 - 71)岁,34.5%为女性,57.5%为基因1a型,23.3%有肝硬化,92%是医疗补助受助人。SVR为85.0%(232/273),而改良意向性治疗SVR为93.2%(232/249);17名患者未实现SVR,2名患者在治疗结束后12周等待SVR结果,24名患者失访。在375.5人年的随访中发现30例再感染(发生率为7.99/100人年)。首次再感染的中位时间(四分位间距)为128(85.25 - 202.5)天。2018年7月1日前,72名患者在3.7年期间使用了DAA;医疗补助DAA限制解除后,109名患者在1.3年期间使用了DAA。预先授权(PA)流程需要多个步骤,罗德岛11家保险公司各不相同,每位患者需要45 - 120分钟。

结论

DAA治疗在城市同地开展的OAT/HCV项目中的边缘化人群中有效。取消DAA限制有助于开始治疗。PA流程仍然是美国扩大治疗能力的一个可改变的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f750/7550646/c2884dcc17fa/ofaa310_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f750/7550646/cc7afd2fe5a9/ofaa310_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f750/7550646/84945cccc930/ofaa310_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f750/7550646/c2884dcc17fa/ofaa310_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f750/7550646/cc7afd2fe5a9/ofaa310_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f750/7550646/84945cccc930/ofaa310_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f750/7550646/c2884dcc17fa/ofaa310_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimizing Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Treatment in a US Colocated HCV/Opioid Agonist Therapy Program.在美国丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)/阿片类激动剂联合治疗项目中优化丙型肝炎病毒治疗
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 13;7(10):ofaa310. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa310. eCollection 2020 Oct.
2
Response to direct-acting antiviral therapy among ongoing drug users and people receiving opioid substitution therapy.正在接受药物治疗的吸毒者和接受阿片类药物替代治疗者对直接作用抗病毒治疗的反应。
J Hepatol. 2019 Jul;71(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.018. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
3
Population-level estimates of hepatitis C reinfection post scale-up of direct-acting antivirals among people who inject drugs.人群水平估计丙型肝炎再感染直接作用抗病毒药物扩大应用于注射毒品人群后
J Hepatol. 2022 Mar;76(3):549-557. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.09.038. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
4
Hepatitis C virus reinfection after successful treatment with direct-acting antiviral therapy in a large population-based cohort.在大型基于人群的队列中,使用直接作用抗病毒治疗成功治疗后丙型肝炎病毒再感染。
J Hepatol. 2018 Nov;69(5):1007-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.07.025. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
5
Hepatitis C reinfection after successful antiviral treatment among people who inject drugs: A meta-analysis.注射吸毒者抗病毒治疗成功后的丙型肝炎再感染:一项荟萃分析。
J Hepatol. 2020 Apr;72(4):643-657. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
6
High HCV cure rates for people who use drugs treated with direct acting antiviral therapy at an urban primary care clinic.在城市基层医疗诊所,采用直接作用抗病毒药物治疗的吸毒者,其 HCV 治愈率较高。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Sep;47:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
7
Intensive Models of Hepatitis C Care for People Who Inject Drugs Receiving Opioid Agonist Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.接受阿片类激动剂治疗的注射吸毒者的丙型肝炎强化护理模式:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 May 7;170(9):594-603. doi: 10.7326/M18-1715. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
8
Psychosocial Factors and the Care Cascade for Hepatitis C Treatment Colocated at a Syringe Service Program.社会心理因素与在注射毒品者服务项目中共同开展丙型肝炎治疗的护理级联
J Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 2;222(Suppl 5):S392-S400. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa142.
9
Factors associated with lost to follow-up after hepatitis C treatment delivered by primary care teams in an inner-city multi-site program, Vancouver, Canada.在加拿大温哥华的一个多地点市内项目中,基层医疗团队提供丙型肝炎治疗后随访丢失的相关因素。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Sep;59:76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
10
Direct-acting antiviral treatment for hepatitis C, reinfection and mortality among people attending an inner-city community health centre in Victoria, Canada.加拿大维多利亚市一家市内社区健康中心的丙型肝炎直接抗病毒治疗、再感染和死亡率。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Oct;72:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical- and Cost-Effectiveness of Liver Disease Staging in Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Microsimulation Study.丙型肝炎病毒感染中肝病分期的临床及成本效益:一项微观模拟研究
Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 24;80(2):300-313. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae485.
2
Predictors of hepatitis C cure among people who inject drugs treated with directly observed therapy supported by peer case managers in Kenya.肯尼亚接受同伴个案管理员支持的直接观察治疗的注射吸毒者中丙型肝炎治愈的预测因素。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Mar;113:103959. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.103959. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
3
Integrated hepatitis C treatment is associated with improved retention and success in outpatient treatment for opioid use disorder at a private clinic.

本文引用的文献

1
CDC Recommendations for Hepatitis C Screening Among Adults - United States, 2020.美国疾病预防控制中心关于 2020 年成年人丙型肝炎筛查的建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020 Apr 10;69(2):1-17. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6902a1.
2
Concurrent Initiation of Hepatitis C and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in People Who Inject Drugs.同时启动丙型肝炎和阿片类药物使用障碍治疗在注射吸毒者中。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 23;71(7):1715-1722. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa105.
3
Hepatitis C Guidance 2019 Update: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-Infectious Diseases Society of America Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection.
在一家私人诊所,丙型肝炎综合治疗与改善阿片类药物使用障碍门诊治疗的留存率及成功率相关。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 14;13:932306. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.932306. eCollection 2022.
4
Impact of an Accelerated Pretreatment Evaluation on Linkage-to-Care for Hepatitis C-infected Persons Who Inject Drugs.加速预处理评估对丙型肝炎感染的注射吸毒者获得治疗的影响。
Subst Abuse. 2022 Aug 12;16:11782218221119068. doi: 10.1177/11782218221119068. eCollection 2022.
5
Integrating Management of Hepatitis C Infection into Primary Care: the Key to Hepatitis C Elimination Efforts.将丙型肝炎感染的管理纳入初级保健:丙型肝炎消除工作的关键。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Oct;37(13):3435-3443. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07628-9. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
6
Primary Care Associated With Follow Up Viral Load Testing in Patients Cured of Hepatitis C Infection With Direct Acting Antivirals at a Multidisciplinary Addiction Treatment Program: Insights From a Real-World Setting.多学科成瘾治疗项目中直接作用抗病毒药物治愈的丙型肝炎感染患者的初级保健与随访病毒载量检测相关:真实世界环境中的观察结果。
J Addict Med. 2022;16(3):333-339. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000910.
7
'Treat my whole person, not just my condition': qualitative explorations of hepatitis C care delivery preferences among people who inject drugs.“全面治疗我这个人,而不仅仅是我的病情”:注射吸毒者的丙型肝炎护理提供偏好的定性探索。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021 Aug 12;16(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13722-021-00260-8.
8
The risk of hepatitis C virus recurrence in hepatitis C virus-infected patients treated with direct-acting antivirals after achieving a sustained virological response: A comprehensive analysis.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗获得持续病毒学应答后丙型肝炎病毒感染患者复发丙型肝炎病毒的风险:综合分析。
Liver Int. 2021 Oct;41(10):2341-2357. doi: 10.1111/liv.14976. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
《2019年丙型肝炎指南更新:美国肝病研究协会-美国传染病学会关于丙型肝炎病毒感染检测、管理及治疗的建议》
Hepatology. 2020 Feb;71(2):686-721. doi: 10.1002/hep.31060.
4
Hepatitis C reinfection after successful antiviral treatment among people who inject drugs: A meta-analysis.注射吸毒者抗病毒治疗成功后的丙型肝炎再感染:一项荟萃分析。
J Hepatol. 2020 Apr;72(4):643-657. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
5
Defining a recovery-oriented cascade of care for opioid use disorder: A community-driven, statewide cross-sectional assessment.定义阿片类药物使用障碍的以康复为导向的连续护理:一项社区驱动的全州范围的横断面评估。
PLoS Med. 2019 Nov 19;16(11):e1002963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002963. eCollection 2019 Nov.
6
Efficacy of Direct-acting Antivirals for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection in People Who Inject Drugs or Receive Opioid Substitution Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.直接作用抗病毒药物治疗注射吸毒或接受阿片类药物替代治疗的慢性丙型肝炎病毒感染者的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 May 23;70(11):2355-2365. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz696.
7
Low Hepatitis C Reinfection Following Direct-acting Antiviral Therapy Among People Who Inject Drugs on Opioid Agonist Therapy.在接受阿片类激动剂治疗的药物注射者中,直接作用抗病毒治疗后丙型肝炎再感染率较低。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 10;70(12):2695-2702. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz693.
8
Hepatitis C treatment outcomes among homeless-experienced individuals at a community health centre in Boston.波士顿社区健康中心中曾有过无家可归经历的个体的丙型肝炎治疗结果。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Oct;72:129-137. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.03.017. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
9
Barriers and facilitators of hepatitis C treatment uptake among people who inject drugs enrolled in opioid treatment programs in Baltimore.巴尔的摩参与阿片类药物治疗项目的注射吸毒者接受丙型肝炎治疗的障碍与促进因素。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 May;100:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
10
Integrated, Co-located, Telemedicine-based Treatment Approaches for Hepatitis C Virus Management in Opioid Use Disorder Patients on Methadone.美沙酮维持治疗的阿片类药物使用障碍患者丙型肝炎病毒管理的整合、共置、远程医疗治疗方法。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 2;69(2):323-331. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy899.