INRAE, URSOLS, F-45075 Orléans, France.
Université de Lorraine, INRAE, LAE, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 10;764:142815. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142815. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
Analysis of trade-offs and synergies between ecosystem services (ES) and their underlying drivers is a main issue in ES research. The analysis is complex and requires innovative analytical approaches. To address this complexity, we used an original approach that combines a multivariate regression tree (MRT), data analysis, and spatial mapping. We applied this approach to the main cropping region in France (mainly the Paris basin of production) using an existing dataset (i.e. soil, climate, crop sequences and management) from the French National Ecosystem Assessment to determine relationships between agricultural production, two services to farmers - nitrogen provision to crops and water provision to crops - and three services to society - blue water provision, water quality regulation, and climate regulation. To support land managers and decision-makers, we also analyzed the extent to which manageable soil properties and agricultural practices (crop rotation and management) are major drivers of trade-offs or synergies. We demonstrated that water quality regulation, nitrogen provision to crops, and climate regulation have synergistic relationships in production situations in the northeastern region of the study area due to the types of crop rotation, frequency of cover crops in the crop rotation, the soil pH, and the soil available water capacity. We also identified that cover crops, while promoting these three ES, can drive a trade-off between two key water-related services: water provision to crops and blue water provision (i.e. between a service to farmers and one to society). By capturing non-linear relationships and threshold effects, our MRT-based approach overcomes the main limitations of classic statistical approaches. The approach is also spatially explicit and simple and intuitive to interpret, especially for non-scientists; our results thus provide researchers and ecosystem managers (e.g. agricultural policy makers) with key information to design ecosystem management strategies that promote a balanced bundle of ES.
分析生态系统服务(ES)及其潜在驱动因素之间的权衡和协同作用是 ES 研究的主要问题。这种分析很复杂,需要创新的分析方法。为了解决这个复杂性,我们使用了一种结合多元回归树(MRT)、数据分析和空间制图的原始方法。我们使用法国国家生态评估的现有数据集(即土壤、气候、作物序列和管理),将该方法应用于法国主要的种植区(主要是生产的巴黎盆地),以确定农业生产、两个农民服务之间的关系 - 为作物提供氮和为作物提供水 - 和三个社会服务 - 蓝水供应、水质调节和气候调节。为了支持土地管理者和决策者,我们还分析了可管理的土壤特性和农业实践(轮作和管理)在多大程度上是权衡或协同作用的主要驱动因素。我们表明,由于轮作类型、轮作中覆盖作物的频率、土壤 pH 值和土壤有效水容量,在研究区域东北部的生产情况下,水质调节、为作物提供氮和气候调节具有协同关系。我们还发现,覆盖作物虽然促进了这三个 ES,但会导致两个与水有关的关键服务之间的权衡:为作物提供水和蓝水供应(即农民服务与社会服务之间)。通过捕捉非线性关系和阈值效应,我们基于 MRT 的方法克服了经典统计方法的主要局限性。该方法还具有空间显式性,简单直观,易于解释,特别是对于非科学家而言;因此,我们的结果为研究人员和生态系统管理者(例如农业政策制定者)提供了关键信息,以设计促进平衡的 ES 组合的生态系统管理策略。