Rees-Punia Erika, Patel Alpa V, Nocera Joseph R, Chantaprasopsuk Sicha, Demark-Wahnefried Wendy, Leach Corinne R, Smith Tenbroeck G, Cella David, Gapstur Susan M
Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia.
Department of Neurology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Cancer. 2021 Jan 1;127(1):115-123. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33257. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
To the authors' knowledge, few studies to date have examined associations between moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sitting time with quality of life in cancer survivors compared with a cancer-free group. The current study examined differences in global mental health (GMH) and global physical health (GPH) across levels of MVPA and sitting among cancer survivors and cancer-free participants.
Cancer Prevention Study II participants (59.9% of whom were female with an age of 77.8 ± 5.8 years) were grouped as: 1) survivors who were 1 to 5 years after diagnosis (3718 participants); 2) survivors who were 6 to 10 years after diagnosis (4248 participants); and 3) cancer-free participants (ie, no history of cancer; 69,860 participants). In 2009, participants completed MVPA, sitting, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System GMH/GPH surveys. Mean differences in GMH and GPH T scores across MVPA (none, 0 to <7.5, 7.5 to <15, 15 to <22.5, and ≥22.5 metabolic equivalent [MET]-hours/week) and sitting (0 to <3, 3 to <6, and ≥6 hours/day) were assessed using multivariate generalized linear models.
The mean GMH and GPH scores were statistically significantly higher in cancer-free participants compared with cancer survivor groups, although the differences were not clinically meaningful (mean difference of 0.52 for GMH and 0.88 for GPH). More MVPA was associated with higher GMH and GPH scores for all 3 groups (P for trend <.001), and differences between the least and most active participants were found to be clinically meaningful (mean differences of ≥4.34 for GMH and ≥6.39 for GPH). Similarly, a lower duration of sitting was associated with higher GMH and GPH scores for all groups (P for trend <.001), with clinically meaningful differences observed between the least and most sedentary participants (mean differences of ≥2.74 for GMH and ≥3.75 for GPH).
The findings of the current study provide evidence of the importance of increased MVPA and decreased sitting for improved health in older adults with or without a prior cancer diagnosis.
据作者所知,与未患癌症的人群相比,迄今为止很少有研究探讨中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)和久坐时间与癌症幸存者生活质量之间的关联。本研究调查了癌症幸存者和未患癌症参与者在不同MVPA水平和久坐时间下的总体心理健康(GMH)和总体身体健康(GPH)差异。
癌症预防研究II的参与者(59.9%为女性,年龄77.8±5.8岁)被分为:1)诊断后1至5年的幸存者(3718名参与者);2)诊断后6至10年的幸存者(4248名参与者);3)未患癌症的参与者(即无癌症病史;69860名参与者)。2009年,参与者完成了MVPA、久坐情况以及患者报告结局测量信息系统的GMH/GPH调查。使用多变量广义线性模型评估了GMH和GPH T评分在MVPA(无、0至<7.5、7.5至<15、15至<22.5以及≥22.5代谢当量[MET]-小时/周)和久坐时间(0至<3、3至<6以及≥6小时/天)各水平上的平均差异。
与癌症幸存者组相比,未患癌症参与者的GMH和GPH平均得分在统计学上显著更高,尽管差异在临床上无意义(GMH平均差异为0.52,GPH平均差异为0.88)。对于所有3组,更多的MVPA与更高的GMH和GPH得分相关(趋势P<.001),并且发现最不活跃和最活跃参与者之间的差异在临床上有意义(GMH平均差异≥4.34,GPH平均差异≥6.39)。同样,所有组中较短的久坐时间与更高的GMH和GPH得分相关(趋势P<.001),在久坐最少和最多的参与者之间观察到临床上有意义的差异(GMH平均差异≥2.74,GPH平均差异≥3.75)。
本研究结果证明,增加MVPA和减少久坐对于改善有或无癌症诊断史的老年人的健康具有重要意义。