• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

格里森评分演变及其对前列腺癌结局的影响。

Gleason Score Evolution and the Effect on Prostate Cancer Outcomes.

机构信息

Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, TX.

Olin E. Teague Veterans' Medical Center, Temple, TX.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 Apr 26;155(5):711-717. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa130.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqaa130
PMID:33079976
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated how the changes in Gleason grading affected the long-term outcomes of a large prostatectomy cohort.

METHODS

We obtained long-term follow-up (16.7 years) in 581 patients having undergone radical retropubic prostatectomy between 1985 and 1995. We excluded those with seminal vesicle and/or lymphatic involvement. We regraded the specimens according to contemporary guidelines and compared how this affected outcomes compared with their original (pre-1995) Gleason scoring. In total, 499 patients were evaluable.

RESULTS

A Gleason score of 6 or less declined from 73% to 29%, and the number increased from 25% to 63% for a Gleason score of 7 and from 5% to 8% for a Gleason score of 8 to 9. As a result, for a Gleason score less than 7, biochemical failure decreased from 28% to 23%, metastatic disease 5% to 2%, and prostate cancer death from 5% to 3%. The same results were 50% to 37%, 11% to 7%, and 10% to 6% for a Gleason score of 7 and 86% to 71%, 43% to 32%, and 29% to 26% for a Gleason score more than 7, respectively. With the most recent grade grouping, for groups 1 to 5, biochemical failure occurred in 23%, 32%, 45%, 69%, and 78%, respectively. Metastatic disease occurred in 2%, 4%, 12%, 24%, and 56%, respectively. Prostate cancer-related death occurred in 2%, 4%, 9%, 21%, and 44%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The revised Gleason scores improved the outcomes in all risk groups. Based on Gleason score, patients with prostate cancer will appear to have better outcomes than they did before 2005, making any comparison tenable. The current grading system shows a consistent increased risk in biochemical failure, metastatic disease, and prostate cancer-related death with each successive grade.

摘要

目的

我们评估了格里森分级变化如何影响大型前列腺切除术队列的长期结果。

方法

我们获得了 581 例 1985 年至 1995 年接受根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术患者的长期随访(16.7 年)。我们排除了那些有精囊和/或淋巴受累的患者。我们根据当代指南重新分级标本,并比较了这与他们最初(1995 年前)的格里森评分相比如何影响结果。共有 499 例患者可评估。

结果

格里森评分 6 或更低的患者从 73%下降到 29%,评分 7 的患者从 25%增加到 63%,评分 8 至 9 的患者从 5%增加到 8%。结果,对于格里森评分低于 7 的患者,生化失败从 28%下降到 23%,转移疾病从 5%下降到 2%,前列腺癌死亡从 5%下降到 3%。对于格里森评分 7 和 8 的患者,结果分别为 50%至 37%、11%至 7%和 10%至 6%,对于格里森评分大于 7 的患者,结果分别为 86%至 71%、43%至 32%和 29%至 26%。根据最新的分级分组,对于第 1 至 5 组,生化失败发生率分别为 23%、32%、45%、69%和 78%。转移疾病发生率分别为 2%、4%、12%、24%和 56%。前列腺癌相关死亡率分别为 2%、4%、9%、21%和 44%。

结论

修订后的格里森评分改善了所有风险组的结果。根据格里森评分,前列腺癌患者的预后似乎比 2005 年前更好,因此任何比较都是可行的。当前的分级系统显示,生化失败、转移疾病和前列腺癌相关死亡的风险随着每一级的增加而持续增加。

相似文献

1
Gleason Score Evolution and the Effect on Prostate Cancer Outcomes.格里森评分演变及其对前列腺癌结局的影响。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 Apr 26;155(5):711-717. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa130.
2
Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.前列腺特异性抗原水平、分期或 Gleason 评分:哪一项最适合预测根治性前列腺切除术后的结果,并且它是否因所测量的结果而异?来自共享平等访问区域癌症医院数据库的结果。
Int J Urol. 2015 Apr;22(4):362-6. doi: 10.1111/iju.12704. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
3
Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.使用基于前列腺特异性抗原密度和活检Gleason评分的新型风险分组系统改善根治性前列腺切除术后生化复发的风险分层。
J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):110-5.
4
Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.根治性前列腺切除术是治疗标本中存在高病理 Gleason 评分前列腺癌的有效方法。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
5
The Impact of Downgrading from Biopsy Gleason 7 to Prostatectomy Gleason 6 on Biochemical Recurrence and Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality.从前列腺穿刺活检的 Gleason 评分 7 级降为前列腺切除术的 Gleason 评分 6 级对生化复发和前列腺癌特异性死亡率的影响。
J Urol. 2017 Apr;197(4):1060-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.079. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
6
Incidence of Extraprostatic Extension at Radical Prostatectomy with Pure Gleason Score 3 + 3 = 6 (Grade Group 1) Cancer: Implications for Whether Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer Should be Renamed "Not Cancer" and for Selection Criteria for Active Surveillance.前列腺根治性切除术时单纯 Gleason 评分 3+3=6(分级分组 1)癌的前列腺外延伸发生率:对是否应将 Gleason 评分 6 前列腺癌重新命名为“非癌”以及主动监测选择标准的影响。
J Urol. 2018 Jun;199(6):1482-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.067. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
7
Combining the Prostate Cancer Risk Index (PRIX) with the Presence of Secondary Circulating Prostate Cells to Predict the Risk of Biochemical Failure after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer.结合前列腺癌风险指数(PRIX)与继发性循环前列腺细胞的存在情况以预测前列腺癌根治术后生化复发风险
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2018 Dec 25;19(12):3375-3381. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.12.3375.
8
Oncological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Based on New Gleason Grouping System: A Validation Study From University of Southern California With 3,755 Cases.基于新 Gleason 分组系统的高危前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后的肿瘤学结局:来自南加州大学的 3755 例病例验证研究
Prostate. 2017 May;77(7):743-748. doi: 10.1002/pros.23306. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
9
Seminal vesicle involvement after radical prostatectomy: predicting risk factors for progression.根治性前列腺切除术后精囊受累:进展的预测危险因素
Urology. 2003 Aug;62(2):304-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00373-x.
10
Presence or absence of a positive pathological margin outperforms any other margin-associated variable in predicting clinically relevant biochemical recurrence in Gleason 7 prostate cancer.在预测格里森 7 前列腺癌临床相关生化复发方面,阳性病理切缘的存在或缺失优于任何其他与切缘相关的变量。
BJU Int. 2013 May;111(6):921-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11665.x. Epub 2013 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of interobserver variability in Gleason grading for prostate carcinoma.前列腺癌Gleason分级中观察者间变异性的评估。
North Clin Istanb. 2025 Jun 23;12(3):337-343. doi: 10.14744/nci.2025.11456. eCollection 2025.
2
Deep-learning triage of 3D pathology datasets for comprehensive and efficient pathologist assessments.用于全面高效的病理学家评估的3D病理数据集的深度学习分类
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 22:2025.07.20.665804. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.20.665804.
3
The state of the art in artificial intelligence and digital pathology in prostate cancer.
前列腺癌人工智能与数字病理学的最新进展。
Nat Rev Urol. 2025 Aug 4. doi: 10.1038/s41585-025-01070-2.
4
XGBoost model for predicting erectile dysfunction risk after radical prostatectomy: development and validation using machine learning.用于预测前列腺癌根治术后勃起功能障碍风险的XGBoost模型:基于机器学习的开发与验证
Discov Oncol. 2025 May 19;16(1):810. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02685-y.
5
Predicting the risk of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer - Development and validation of a nomogram model.预测新诊断前列腺癌患者发生骨转移的风险——列线图模型的构建与验证
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 30;20(1):e0318051. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318051. eCollection 2025.
6
Unveiling the molecular profile of a prostate carcinoma: implications for personalized medicine.揭示前列腺癌的分子特征:对个性化医疗的启示。
Biol Direct. 2024 Dec 31;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13062-024-00492-z.
7
Development and external validation of a nomogram to predict the prognosis of patients with metastatic prostate cancer who underwent radiotherapy.预测接受放疗的转移性前列腺癌患者预后的列线图的开发与外部验证
Gland Surg. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):2137-2147. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-313. Epub 2024 Nov 26.
8
Identification of high-risk tumor characteristics in patients with localized prostate cancer using conventional combined with diffusion-weighted MRI imaging parameters.使用传统成像参数结合扩散加权MRI成像参数识别局限性前列腺癌患者的高风险肿瘤特征。
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 15;14(10):4909-4921. doi: 10.62347/XADT5737. eCollection 2024.
9
Prognostic Value of PlGF Upregulation in Prostate Cancer.胎盘生长因子上调在前列腺癌中的预后价值
Biomedicines. 2024 Sep 26;12(10):2194. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12102194.
10
A novel assessment of whole-mount Gleason grading in prostate cancer to identify candidates for radical prostatectomy: a machine learning-based multiomics study.一种新的基于机器学习的多组学方法对前列腺癌全器官 Gleason 分级的评估,以识别接受根治性前列腺切除术的候选者。
Theranostics. 2024 Aug 1;14(12):4570-4581. doi: 10.7150/thno.96921. eCollection 2024.