Suppr超能文献

基于平均公共特征提取技术的鲁棒分布式拒绝服务攻击检测

Error-Robust Distributed Denial of Service Attack Detection Based on an Average Common Feature Extraction Technique.

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil.

Department 2-Campus Lippstadt, Hamm-Lippstadt University of Applied Sciences, 59063 Hamm, Germany.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2020 Oct 16;20(20):5845. doi: 10.3390/s20205845.

Abstract

In recent years, advanced threats against Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs), such as Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, are increasing. Furthermore, traditional machine learning-based intrusion detection systems (IDSs) often fail to efficiently detect such attacks when corrupted datasets are used for IDS training. To face these challenges, this paper proposes a novel error-robust multidimensional technique for DDoS attack detection. By applying the well-known Higher Order Singular Value Decomposition (HOSVD), initially, the average value of the common features among instances is filtered out from the dataset. Next, the filtered data are forwarded to machine learning classification algorithms in which traffic information is classified as a legitimate or a DDoS attack. In terms of results, the proposed scheme outperforms traditional low-rank approximation techniques, presenting an accuracy of 98.94%, detection rate of 97.70% and false alarm rate of 4.35% for a dataset corruption level of 30% with a random forest algorithm applied for classification. In addition, for error-free conditions, it is found that the proposed approach outperforms other related works, showing accuracy, detection rate and false alarm rate of 99.87%, 99.86% and 0.16%, respectively, for the gradient boosting classifier.

摘要

近年来,针对网络物理系统(CPS)的高级威胁,如分布式拒绝服务(DDoS)攻击,正在不断增加。此外,当使用被篡改的数据集进行 IDS 训练时,传统的基于机器学习的入侵检测系统(IDS)往往无法有效地检测到此类攻击。为了应对这些挑战,本文提出了一种新颖的错误鲁棒多维技术,用于 DDoS 攻击检测。通过应用著名的高阶奇异值分解(HOSVD),首先从数据集中过滤出实例之间常见特征的平均值。然后,将过滤后的数据转发到机器学习分类算法中,根据流量信息将其分类为合法或 DDoS 攻击。从结果来看,所提出的方案优于传统的低秩逼近技术,在应用随机森林算法进行分类时,对于数据集篡改程度为 30%,准确率为 98.94%,检测率为 97.70%,误报率为 4.35%。此外,在无错误的情况下,对于梯度提升分类器,所提出的方法表现优于其他相关工作,准确率、检测率和误报率分别为 99.87%、99.86%和 0.16%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec73/7602739/789667e5e38b/sensors-20-05845-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验