• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化练习安排需要对单个项目的表现进行量化跟踪。

Optimizing practice scheduling requires quantitative tracking of individual item performance.

作者信息

Eglington Luke G, Pavlik Philip I

机构信息

Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN USA.

出版信息

NPJ Sci Learn. 2020 Oct 15;5:15. doi: 10.1038/s41539-020-00074-4. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1038/s41539-020-00074-4
PMID:33083008
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7567101/
Abstract

Decades of research has shown that spacing practice trials over time can improve later memory, but there are few concrete recommendations concerning how to optimally space practice. We show that existing recommendations are inherently suboptimal due to their insensitivity to time costs and individual- and item-level differences. We introduce an alternative approach that optimally schedules practice with a computational model of spacing in tandem with microeconomic principles. We simulated conventional spacing schedules and our adaptive model-based approach. Simulations indicated that practicing according to microeconomic principles of resulted in substantially better memory retention than alternatives. The simulation results provided quantitative estimates of optimal difficulty that differed markedly from prior recommendations but still supported a desirable difficulty framework. Experimental results supported simulation predictions, with up to 40% more items recalled in conditions where practice was scheduled optimally according to the model of practice. Our approach can be readily implemented in online educational systems that adaptively schedule practice and has significant implications for millions of students currently learning with educational technology.

摘要

数十年的研究表明,随着时间推移分散练习试验可以改善后期记忆,但关于如何以最佳方式安排练习,具体建议却很少。我们表明,现有建议本质上是次优的,因为它们对时间成本以及个体和项目层面的差异不敏感。我们引入了一种替代方法,该方法结合微观经济原理,利用一种计算间隔模型来优化练习安排。我们模拟了传统的间隔安排和基于模型的自适应方法。模拟结果表明,根据微观经济原理进行练习比其他方法能显著提高记忆保持效果。模拟结果提供了最佳难度的定量估计,这与先前的建议有显著差异,但仍支持一个理想的难度框架。实验结果支持了模拟预测,在根据练习模型进行最佳安排的条件下,回忆的项目数量比其他条件多多达40%。我们的方法可以很容易地在自适应安排练习的在线教育系统中实施,并且对目前使用教育技术学习的数百万学生具有重大意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/8c8719f34298/41539_2020_74_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/72f767ff8c9b/41539_2020_74_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/2c29f68ea4d5/41539_2020_74_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/ffb16e95b965/41539_2020_74_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/8abea605579c/41539_2020_74_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/fa03fbbfb179/41539_2020_74_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/b2daf01efc36/41539_2020_74_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/201c229a88c4/41539_2020_74_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/bf910ac0834b/41539_2020_74_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/8c8719f34298/41539_2020_74_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/72f767ff8c9b/41539_2020_74_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/2c29f68ea4d5/41539_2020_74_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/ffb16e95b965/41539_2020_74_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/8abea605579c/41539_2020_74_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/fa03fbbfb179/41539_2020_74_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/b2daf01efc36/41539_2020_74_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/201c229a88c4/41539_2020_74_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/bf910ac0834b/41539_2020_74_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad9/7567101/8c8719f34298/41539_2020_74_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimizing practice scheduling requires quantitative tracking of individual item performance.优化练习安排需要对单个项目的表现进行量化跟踪。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2020 Oct 15;5:15. doi: 10.1038/s41539-020-00074-4. eCollection 2020.
2
A comparison of adaptive and fixed schedules of practice.适应性练习计划与固定练习计划的比较。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jul;145(7):897-917. doi: 10.1037/xge0000170. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
3
Adaptive vs. Fixed Spacing of Learning Items: Evidence from Studies of Learning and Transfer in Chemistry Education.学习项目的自适应间距与固定间距:来自化学教育中学习与迁移研究的证据。
Cogsci. 2020 Jul-Aug;2020:1598-1604.
4
Comparing Adaptive and Random Spacing Schedules during Learning to Mastery Criteria.在学习至掌握标准过程中比较适应性和随机间隔时间表。
Cogsci. 2020 Jul-Aug;2020:773-779.
5
Using a model to compute the optimal schedule of practice.使用模型计算最佳练习计划。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Jun;14(2):101-17. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.101.
6
Maximizing students' retention via spaced review: practical guidance from computational models of memory.通过间隔复习最大化学生的保持率:来自记忆计算模型的实践指导。
Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Jan;6(1):157-69. doi: 10.1111/tops.12077.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
Translational Metabolomics of Head Injury: Exploring Dysfunctional Cerebral Metabolism with Ex Vivo NMR Spectroscopy-Based Metabolite Quantification头部损伤的转化代谢组学:基于体外核磁共振波谱的代谢物定量分析探索脑代谢功能障碍
10
Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing.间隔检索:绝对间隔增强学习,而与相对间隔无关。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1250-7. doi: 10.1037/a0023436.

引用本文的文献

1
No Simple Solutions to Complex Problems: Cognitive Science Principles Can Guide but Not Prescribe Educational Decisions.复杂问题没有简单的解决方案:认知科学原理可以提供指导,但不能规定教育决策。
Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 2024 Mar;11(1):59-66. doi: 10.1177/23727322231218906. Epub 2023 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Techniques for scaffolding retrieval practice: The costs and benefits of adaptive versus diminishing cues.支架式检索练习的技术:自适应提示与逐渐减少提示的成本与收益。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Oct;26(5):1666-1674. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01617-6.
2
Enhancing human learning via spaced repetition optimization.通过间隔重复优化增强人类学习。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 5;116(10):3988-3993. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815156116. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
3
Mechanisms underlying the spacing effect in learning: A comparison of three computational models.
学习中间隔效应的作用机制:三种计算模型的比较。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Sep;147(9):1325-1348. doi: 10.1037/xge0000416.
4
Transfer of test-enhanced learning: Meta-analytic review and synthesis.测试增强学习的迁移:元分析综述与综合。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Jul;144(7):710-756. doi: 10.1037/bul0000151. Epub 2018 May 7.
5
Evaluating the Theoretic Adequacy and Applied Potential of Computational Models of the Spacing Effect.评估间隔效应计算模型的理论充分性和应用潜力。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;42 Suppl 3:644-691. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12602. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
6
The efficacy of learners' testing choices.学习者测试选择的有效性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Apr;44(4):540-552. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000473. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
Sample-Size Planning for More Accurate Statistical Power: A Method Adjusting Sample Effect Sizes for Publication Bias and Uncertainty.更准确的统计功效的样本量规划:一种调整发表偏倚和不确定性的样本效应大小的方法。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;28(11):1547-1562. doi: 10.1177/0956797617723724. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
8
Optimizing Learning in College: Tips From Cognitive Psychology.优化大学学习:认知心理学的启示。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Sep;11(5):652-660. doi: 10.1177/1745691616645770.
9
TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences.TurkPrime.com:一个适用于行为科学的多功能众包数据采集平台。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):433-442. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z.
10
An Individual's Rate of Forgetting is Stable Over Time but Differs Across Materials.个体的遗忘率随时间推移是稳定的,但因材料不同而有所差异。
Top Cogn Sci. 2016 Jan;8(1):305-21. doi: 10.1111/tops.12183. Epub 2016 Jan 8.