Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Office of Air and Radiation, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Nov 3;54(21):13370-13378. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c01053. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
Macpherson et al. (2017) presented a mathematical programming model that identifies minimum-cost control strategies that reduce emissions regionally to meet ambient air quality targets. This project introduces the Cost And Benefit Optimization Tool for Ozone (CABOT-O), which extends the previous model by updating emissions and air quality relationships, adding a health impacts module, and quantifying distributional impacts. The tool draws upon source apportionment photochemical air quality modeling to characterize the contribution of emissions reductions to ambient ozone concentrations across the contiguous United States. The health impacts analysis module estimates the change in the number and economic value of premature deaths using modeled changes in ozone levels resulting from the application of emission control strategies. These extensions allow us to evaluate strategies to attain ozone air quality standards at minimum cost or to maximize net benefit, while assessing the change in the distribution of health impacts. In a case study applied to stationary pollution sources, we find that, when compared to minimizing costs to meet a uniform ozone standard, maximizing net benefits results in greater emissions and ozone concentration reductions in some parts of the country and fewer in others. Our results highlight potential equity-efficiency trade-offs in designing air quality policies.
麦克弗森等人(2017 年)提出了一个数学规划模型,该模型确定了降低区域排放以达到环境空气质量目标的最低成本控制策略。本项目引入了臭氧成本效益优化工具(CABOT-O),该工具通过更新排放和空气质量关系、添加健康影响模块以及量化分配影响,扩展了之前的模型。该工具利用源解析光化学空气质量模型来描述减少排放对美国大陆各地环境臭氧浓度的贡献。健康影响分析模块使用模型化的臭氧水平变化来估计由于实施排放控制策略而导致的过早死亡人数和经济价值的变化。这些扩展使我们能够评估以最低成本实现臭氧空气质量标准或最大化净效益的策略,同时评估健康影响分布的变化。在应用于固定污染源的案例研究中,我们发现,与为满足统一的臭氧标准而将成本最小化相比,最大化净效益会导致该国某些地区的排放量和臭氧浓度降低更多,而其他地区的排放量和臭氧浓度降低更少。我们的结果突出了在设计空气质量政策时潜在的公平-效率权衡。