Department of Research and Development, Norwegian Air Ambulance Foundation, NO-0103, Oslo, Norway.
SHARE Center for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 21;28(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00803-z.
Handling and initiating of treatment in a prehospital setting are complex processes that involve many treatment options and include several parts of the chain of survival. Capacity to adapt to unexpected changes in the patients' conditions or in the surroundings is a prerequisite for patient safety. Outside the healthcare sector, safety science is moving from an approach focused on the analysis and management of error (Safety I) to instead understanding the inherent properties of safety systems (Safety II). In healthcare the attention to why service providers are able to succeed under challenging conditions remains sparse. The aim of this commentary is to give a better understanding of how the concept and inclusion of resilience can inspire a new approach for future research in prehospital settings. So far, most resilience studies have been conducted in emergency departments while the role of contextual factors and adaptations in a prehospital setting has remained unexplored.
In contrast to traditional research on healthcare quality and safety, which tends to focus on failures, resilience research is interested in examining the overwhelming majority of healthcare processes with successful outcomes, to determine how high-quality patient care is generated. Resilience is conceptualized as a proactive ability to adjust to potentially harmful influences and challenges rather than to resist them. To better understand and promote resilience, there is a need to explore the underlying mechanisms of adaptation, trade-offs and improvisation that occur in the emergency chain. Attention to how people respond to disruptions, challenges and opportunities is vital. There are factors, recognized and unidentified, influencing adaptation, trade-offs and improvisation. Influencing factors at different levels could be of particular value to increase knowledge to better understand resilience in a practical perspective. As prehospital work conditions are highly unpredictable and diverse, learning through everyday work could be of great value if the experiences are transferred and integrated in training and simulation.
Empirical research is of crucial importance to build and support resilient systems and processes in a prehospital setting. We need a new framework and a new approach to how research on this topic is conducted and to support resilient performance. This should involve identifying factors that promote resilience, both on individual-, team- and system- levels.
在院前环境中进行处理和启动治疗是一个复杂的过程,其中涉及许多治疗选择,并包含生存链的几个部分。适应患者病情或周围环境的意外变化的能力是患者安全的前提。在医疗保健领域之外,安全科学正在从关注分析和管理错误(安全 I)转变为理解安全系统的固有特性(安全 II)。在医疗保健领域,对为什么服务提供者在具有挑战性的条件下能够成功的关注仍然很少。本文的目的是更好地理解如何通过概念和韧性的纳入为未来的院前环境研究提供新的方法。到目前为止,大多数韧性研究都是在急诊科进行的,而在院前环境中,背景因素和适应性的作用仍未得到探索。
与传统的医疗质量和安全研究往往侧重于失败不同,韧性研究感兴趣的是检查绝大多数以成功结果为导向的医疗过程,以确定如何产生高质量的患者护理。韧性被概念化为一种主动适应潜在有害影响和挑战的能力,而不是抵抗它们。为了更好地理解和促进韧性,需要探索适应、权衡和即兴创作的潜在机制,这些机制发生在紧急链中。关注人们如何应对干扰、挑战和机会是至关重要的。有一些因素,包括已识别和未识别的因素,影响适应、权衡和即兴创作。不同层次的影响因素对于增加知识以从实际角度更好地理解韧性可能具有特别的价值。由于院前工作条件高度不可预测和多样化,通过日常工作学习如果将经验转移并整合到培训和模拟中,可能会非常有价值。
实证研究对于建立和支持院前环境中的弹性系统和过程至关重要。我们需要一个新的框架和方法来进行关于这一主题的研究,并支持有弹性的表现。这应该包括确定在个体、团队和系统层面上促进韧性的因素。