Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, 1-Km Defense road, Lahore, Pakistan.
Punjab University College of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Jun;16(3):920-926. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.397. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
High levels of stress are expected when crises affect people's lives. Therefore, this Web-based, cross-sectional study was conducted among university students from Pakistan to investigate the psychological impairment and coping strategies during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Google Forms were used to disseminate the online questionnaire to assess anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and coping strategies (Brief-COPE). A total of 1134 responses (age, 21.7 ± 3.5 y) were included. The frequency of students having moderate-severe anxiety and depression (score ≥ 10) were ≈ 34% and 45%, respectively. The respondents' aged ≥ 31 y had significantly lower depression score than those ≤ 20 y ( = 0.047). Males had significantly less anxiety (6.62 ± 5.70 vs 7.84 ± 5.60; = 0.001) and depression (8.73 ± 6.84 vs 9.71 ± 7.06; = 0.031) scores. Those having family members, friends, or acquaintances infected with disease had significantly higher anxiety scores (8.89 ± 5.74 vs 7.09 ± 5.56; < 0.001). Regarding coping strategies, the majority of respondents were found to have adopted religious/spiritual coping (6.45 ± 1.68) followed by acceptance (5.58 ± 1.65), self-distraction (4.97 ± 1.61), and active coping (4.81 ± 1.57). In conclusion, COVID-19 caused significant impairment on mental health of the students. The most frequent coping strategies adopted by students were religious/spiritual and acceptance coping. During epidemics, mental health of students should not be neglected.
当危机影响人们的生活时,人们预计会承受高度的压力。因此,本项基于网络的横断面研究在巴基斯坦的大学生中进行,旨在调查 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的心理损伤和应对策略。使用 Google 表单在线分发问卷,以评估焦虑症(广泛性焦虑障碍-7)、抑郁症(患者健康问卷-9)和应对策略(Brief-COPE)。共纳入 1134 名(年龄 21.7±3.5 岁)的应答者。具有中重度焦虑和抑郁(评分≥10)的学生频率约为 34%和 45%。年龄≥31 岁的应答者的抑郁评分明显低于≤20 岁的应答者( = 0.047)。男性的焦虑评分(6.62±5.70 比 7.84±5.60; = 0.001)和抑郁评分(8.73±6.84 比 9.71±7.06; = 0.031)明显较低。有家庭成员、朋友或熟人感染疾病的应答者的焦虑评分明显较高(8.89±5.74 比 7.09±5.56; < 0.001)。在应对策略方面,大多数应答者发现采用了宗教/精神应对(6.45±1.68),其次是接受(5.58±1.65)、自我分心(4.97±1.61)和积极应对(4.81±1.57)。总之,COVID-19 对学生的心理健康造成了显著的损伤。学生最常采用的应对策略是宗教/精神应对和接受应对。在疫情期间,不应忽视学生的心理健康。