Nanda Tavish, Sanchez Andrew, Purswani Juhi, Wu Cheng-Chia, Kazim Michael, Wang Tony J C
Columbia University Irving Medical Center Harkness Eye Institute, New York, New York.
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York.
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Feb 29;5(5):804-808. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.02.005. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
Few studies have evaluated the methodology by which radiation therapy (RT) for thyroid eye disease and compressive optic neuropathy is performed. The objective of this study was to retrospectively review our experience from a radiation planning standpoint and to determine whether current treatment methods provide adequate dose to target and collateral structures.
A retrospective review of 52 patients (104 orbits) with bilateral thyroid eye disease and compressive optic neuropathy treated with RT (20 Gy in 10 fractions) at our institution. RT plans were analyzed for target volumes and doses. Visual fields, color plates, and visual acuity were assessed pretreatment and at last available follow-up post RT. A standardized, anatomic contour of the retro-orbital space was applied to these retrospective plans to determine dose to the entire space, rather than the self-selected target structure.
Compared with the anatomic retro-orbital space, the original contour overlapped by only 68%. Maximum and mean dose was 2134 cGy and 1910 cGy to the anatomic retro-orbital space. Consequently, 39.8% of the orbits had a mean dose <19 Gy (<17 Gy 16.4%, <18 Gy 27.6% <19 Gy 37.8%, <20 Gy 59.2%, 20-21 Gy 35.8%, >21 Gy 5%). There was no significant association of improvement in color plates ( = .07), visual fields ( = .77), and visual acuity ( = .62), based on these dose differences. When beam placement was retrospectively adjusted to include a space of 0.5 cm between the lens and the anterior beam edge, there was a 39.4% and 20.3% decrease in max and mean dose to the lens.
Without a standardized protocol for contouring in thyroid eye disease, target delineation was found to be rather varied, even among the same practitioner. Differences in dose to the anatomic retro-orbital space did not affect outcomes in the follow-up period. Although precise contouring of the retro-orbital space may be of little clinical consequence overall, a >0.5 cm space from the lens may significantly reduce or delay cataractogenesis.
很少有研究评估甲状腺眼病和压迫性视神经病变的放射治疗(RT)实施方法。本研究的目的是从放射治疗计划的角度回顾我们的经验,并确定当前的治疗方法是否能为靶区和周围结构提供足够的剂量。
回顾性分析我院52例(104只眼眶)双侧甲状腺眼病并伴有压迫性视神经病变且接受RT治疗(10次分割,共20 Gy)的患者。分析RT计划的靶区体积和剂量。在放疗前及最后一次随访时评估视野、色板和视力。将标准化的眶后间隙解剖轮廓应用于这些回顾性计划,以确定整个间隙的剂量,而非自行选择的靶结构的剂量。
与眶后间隙的解剖结构相比,原始轮廓的重叠率仅为68%。眶后间隙解剖结构的最大剂量和平均剂量分别为2134 cGy和1910 cGy。因此,39.8%的眼眶平均剂量<19 Gy(<17 Gy占16.4%,<18 Gy占27.6%,<19 Gy占37.8%,<20 Gy占59.2%,20 - 21 Gy占35.8%,>21 Gy占5%)。基于这些剂量差异,色板(P = 0.07)、视野(P = 0.77)和视力(P = 0.62)的改善无显著相关性。当回顾性调整射野位置,使晶状体与前射野边缘之间留出0.5 cm的间隙时,晶状体的最大剂量和平均剂量分别降低了39.4%和20.3%。
在甲状腺眼病的轮廓勾画方面缺乏标准化方案,即使是同一医生,靶区勾画也存在较大差异。眶后间隙解剖结构剂量的差异在随访期内未影响治疗结果。虽然眶后间隙的精确轮廓勾画总体上可能对临床影响不大,但晶状体与射野边缘保持>0.5 cm的间隙可能会显著减少或延迟白内障的发生。