Testoni Ines, Bortolotti Camilla, Pompele Sara, Ronconi Lucia, Baracco Gloria, Orkibi Hod
Department of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology (FISPPA), University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Emili Sagol Creative Arts Therapies Research Center, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 Oct 21;10(10):160. doi: 10.3390/bs10100160.
This article considers a particular aspect of palliative psychology that is inherent to the needs in the area of attitudes concerning Advance Healthcare Directives (AHDs) among Italian physicians and nurses after the promulgation of Law No. 219/2017 on AHDs and informed consent in 2018. The study utilized a mixed-method approach. The group of participants was composed of 102 healthcare professionals (63 females and 39 males). The quantitative part utilized the following scales: Attitudes toward Euthanasia, the Religious Orientation Scale, the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding, and the Testoni Death Representation Scale. The results were mostly in line with the current literature, especially concerning a positive correlation between religiosity and the participants' rejection of the idea of euthanasia. However, the qualitative results showed both positive and negative attitudes towards AHDs, with four main thematic areas: "Positive aspects of the new law and of AHDs", "Negative aspects of the new law and of AHDs", "Changes that occurred in the professional context and critical incidents", and "Attitudes towards euthanasia requests." It emerged that there is not any polarization between Catholics or religious people and secularists: Their positions are substantially similar with respect to all aspects, including with regard to euthanasia. The general result is that the law is not sufficiently understood, and so a quarter of the participants associate AHDs with euthanasia. Discussions on the opportunity for palliative psychologists to help health professionals to better manage these issues through death education courses are presented.
本文探讨了姑息心理学的一个特定方面,这一特定方面是2018年第219/2017号关于预立医疗指示(AHDs)和知情同意的法律颁布后,意大利医生和护士在对待AHDs态度方面的需求所固有的。该研究采用了混合方法。参与者群体由102名医疗专业人员组成(63名女性和39名男性)。定量部分使用了以下量表:对安乐死的态度量表、宗教取向量表、社会赞许性平衡量表和泰斯托尼死亡表征量表。研究结果大多与当前文献一致,特别是在宗教信仰与参与者对安乐死观念的拒绝之间存在正相关方面。然而,定性结果显示了对AHDs的积极和消极态度,主要有四个主题领域:“新法律和AHDs的积极方面”、“新法律和AHDs的消极方面”、“职业环境中发生的变化和关键事件”以及“对安乐死请求的态度”。结果表明,天主教徒或宗教人士与世俗主义者之间不存在任何两极分化:他们在所有方面的立场基本相似,包括在安乐死方面。总体结果是,该法律没有得到充分理解,因此四分之一的参与者将AHDs与安乐死联系起来。文中还讨论了姑息心理学家通过死亡教育课程帮助卫生专业人员更好地处理这些问题的可能性。