• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度 2002-2013 年的疫苗接种不平等。

Vaccination Inequality in India, 2002-2013.

机构信息

Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.

Department of Survey Methodology, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jan;60(1 Suppl 1):S65-S76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.06.034. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2020.06.034
PMID:33097336
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

India's childhood vaccination coverage has increased amid the implementation of national health policies intended to improve immunization levels. However, there is a dearth of contemporary studies comparing state-level childhood vaccination rates across India's highly diverse states and territories. This study assesses SES-based inequalities in childhood vaccination by state for 2002-2013.

METHODS

National surveys from 2002 to 2004, 2007 to 2008, and 2012 to 2013 were used for analyses. Household SES was assessed using an asset index created through principal component analysis. Full vaccination comprised 1 dose bacille Calmette-Guerin, 3 doses diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus vaccine, 3 doses oral polio vaccine, and 1 dose measles-containing vaccine at age 12-60 months. Inequality analyses were stratified by 3 time periods and by government-designated high focus group versus non-high focus group states.

RESULTS

Childhood vaccination steadily increased between 2002 and 2013 in high focus group states but fell in some non-high focus group states, whereas SES-based vaccination inequalities generally decreased in both. In 2012-2013, rural areas had lower vaccination rates than urban areas in high focus group states but similar vaccination rates as urban areas in non-high focus group states. Increases in vaccination rates were not consistently accompanied by improvements in SES-based inequalities in vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Childhood vaccination in India has improved overall, although increases are more pronounced in high focus group states than in non-high focus group states over the study period. The gap in coverage between these states decreased over time owing in part to the latter experiencing reductions in full vaccination rates during 2007-2013. SES-based vaccination disparities persist in India, highlighting the need to improve vaccination rates for all children, especially those from disadvantaged and underserved groups.

SUPPLEMENT INFORMATION

This article is part of a supplement entitled Global Vaccination Equity, which is sponsored by the Global Institute for Vaccine Equity at the University of Michigan School of Public Health.

摘要

简介

随着旨在提高免疫水平的国家卫生政策的实施,印度的儿童疫苗接种覆盖率有所提高。然而,在高度多样化的邦和联邦属地之间,关于印度各州儿童疫苗接种率的当代研究却很少。本研究评估了 2002-2013 年按邦划分的儿童疫苗接种的基于社会经济地位的不平等现象。

方法

利用 2002-2004 年、2007-2008 年和 2012-2013 年的全国性调查进行分析。家庭社会经济地位通过主成分分析创建的资产指数进行评估。完全接种包括在 12-60 个月龄时接种 1 剂卡介苗、3 剂白喉-百日咳-破伤风疫苗、3 剂口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗和 1 剂麻疹疫苗。不平等分析分为 3 个时期和政府指定的高重点组与非高重点组邦。

结果

2002 年至 2013 年,高重点组邦的儿童疫苗接种率稳步上升,但一些非高重点组邦的接种率有所下降,而基于社会经济地位的疫苗接种不平等现象总体上在这两个组中都有所减少。2012-2013 年,高重点组邦的农村地区的疫苗接种率低于城市地区,而非高重点组邦的农村地区与城市地区的疫苗接种率相同。疫苗接种率的提高并不总是伴随着基于社会经济地位的疫苗接种不平等现象的改善。

结论

印度的儿童疫苗接种总体上有所改善,尽管在研究期间,高重点组邦的增长更为明显。由于后者在 2007-2013 年期间经历了完全接种率的下降,这些邦之间的覆盖差距随着时间的推移而缩小。印度仍然存在基于社会经济地位的疫苗接种差异,这突出表明需要提高所有儿童,特别是弱势群体和服务不足群体的疫苗接种率。

补充信息

本文是题为“全球疫苗公平性”的补充文章的一部分,该补充文章由密歇根大学公共卫生学院全球疫苗公平研究所赞助。

相似文献

1
Vaccination Inequality in India, 2002-2013.印度 2002-2013 年的疫苗接种不平等。
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jan;60(1 Suppl 1):S65-S76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.06.034. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Socioeconomic inequality trends in childhood vaccination coverage in India: Findings from multiple rounds of National Family Health Survey.印度儿童疫苗接种覆盖率的社会经济不平等趋势:来自多轮国家家庭健康调查的发现。
Vaccine. 2020 May 22;38(25):4088-4103. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.04.023. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
Change in full immunization inequalities in Indian children 12-23 months: an analysis of household survey data.印度儿童 12-23 个月全免疫差距变化:家庭调查数据分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 1;21(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10849-y.
4
Factors Associated with Vaccination Status of Children Aged 12-48 Months in India, 2012-2013.2012 - 2013年印度12至48个月儿童疫苗接种状况的相关因素
Matern Child Health J. 2018 Mar;22(3):419-428. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2409-6.
5
Immunization coverage levels among 19- to 35-month-old children in 4 diverse, medically underserved areas of the United States.美国4个不同的医疗服务欠缺地区19至35个月大儿童的免疫接种覆盖率水平。
Pediatrics. 2004 Apr;113(4):e296-302. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.4.e296.
6
Role of the private sector in vaccination service delivery in India: evidence from private-sector vaccine sales data, 2009-12.印度私营部门在疫苗接种服务提供中的作用:来自2009 - 2012年私营部门疫苗销售数据的证据
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Sep;31(7):884-96. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw008. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
7
Child vaccination in sub-Saharan Africa: Increasing coverage addresses inequalities.撒哈拉以南非洲地区的儿童疫苗接种:提高覆盖率可解决不平等问题。
Vaccine. 2022 Jan 3;40(1):141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
8
Routine childhood vaccination in India from 2005-2006 to 2015-2016: Temporal trends and geographic variation.2005-2006 年至 2015-2016 年印度常规儿童疫苗接种:时间趋势和地域差异。
Vaccine. 2022 Nov 15;40(48):6924-6930. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.024. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
9
Exploring the spatial heterogeneity in different doses of vaccination coverage in India.探索印度不同疫苗接种覆盖率剂量的空间异质性。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207209. eCollection 2018.
10
The trend of full vaccination coverage in infants and inequalities by wealth quintile and maternal education: analysis from four recent demographic and health surveys in Nepal.婴儿完全疫苗接种覆盖率的趋势以及按财富五分位数和母亲受教育程度划分的不平等:来自尼泊尔最近四次人口与健康调查的分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):1673. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7995-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-sectional study of vaccine coverage among children aged 1 to 24 months in Opuwo District, Kunene region, Namibia.纳米比亚库内内地区奥普沃区1至24个月儿童疫苗接种覆盖率的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 14;25(1):1775. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22878-y.
2
Trend of immunization & gap in vaccine doses as observed in National Family Health Survey rounds in India.在印度全国家庭健康调查各轮次中观察到的免疫接种趋势及疫苗接种剂量差距。
Indian J Med Res. 2024;160(3&4):303-311. doi: 10.25259/ijmr_1770_23.
3
Inequality in Childhood Immunization Coverage: A Scoping Review of Data Sources, Analyses, and Reporting Methods.
儿童免疫接种覆盖率的不平等:数据来源、分析及报告方法的范围综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Jul 29;12(8):850. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12080850.
4
Caregiver perceptions of the broader societal benefits of vaccination: A path toward sustainable vaccine advocacy in India.照顾者对疫苗接种更广泛社会益处的认知:印度可持续疫苗宣传之路。
SSM Qual Res Health. 2022 Dec;2:None. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100156.
5
Added value of the measles-rubella supplementary immunization activity in reaching unvaccinated and under-vaccinated children, a cross-sectional study in five Indian districts, 2018-20.2018-20 年,在印度五个地区开展的横断面研究显示,麻疹-风疹补充免疫活动在为未接种和未全程接种疫苗的儿童接种疫苗方面具有附加价值。
Vaccine. 2023 Jan 9;41(2):486-495. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.010. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
6
Antibiotic consumption in India: geographical variations and temporal changes between 2011 and 2019.印度的抗生素消费情况:2011年至2019年间的地域差异和时间变化
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Oct 26;4(5):dlac112. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac112. eCollection 2022 Oct.
7
Cross fertilisation of Public Health and Translational Research.公共卫生与转化研究的交叉融合。
J Indian Inst Sci. 2022;102(2):763-782. doi: 10.1007/s41745-022-00317-w. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
8
COVID-19 vaccine distribution planning using a congested queuing system-A real case from Australia.使用拥堵排队系统进行COVID-19疫苗分配规划——来自澳大利亚的一个真实案例。
Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev. 2022 Jul;163:102749. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102749. Epub 2022 May 30.