Suppr超能文献

比较口腔颌面外科中使用的可生物降解和钛骨内固定系统的机械性能。

Comparison of the mechanical properties of biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis systems used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, P.O. Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, P.O. Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 23;10(1):18143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75299-9.

Abstract

To guide the selection of osteosynthesis systems, this study compared the mechanical properties of biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis systems. SonicPins Rx and xG were subjected to pull-out tests. Additionally, 15 biodegradable (Inion CPS 2.0 and 2.5 mm; LactoSorb 2.0 mm; Macropore 2.0 mm; Polymax 2.0 mm; BioSorb FX 2.0 mm; ResorbX 2.1 mm; Osteotrans-MX 2.0 mm with plate thicknesses 1.0 and 1.4 mm; SonicWeld Rx/Rx, xG/Rx and xG/xG 2.1 mm without and with tapping the burr hole) and six titanium (CrossDrive (2006), CrossDrive (2018), MaxDrive; all 1.5 and 2.0 mm) straight, four-hole osteosynthesis systems were evaluated. All systems were subjected to tensile, bending and torsion tests. Pull-out loads of the SonicPins were comparable (P = 0.423). Titanium systems' tensile loads were higher than biodegradable systems (P < 0.001). CrossDrive (2018) and MaxDrive systems' tensile and torsional stiffness were lower, accompanied with higher ductility, than corresponding CrossDrive (2006) systems (P < 0.001). Bending stiffness of 1.5 mm titanium systems was comparable to, and of the 2.0 mm systems higher than, all biodegradable systems (P < 0.001). Regarding biodegradable systems, Inion CPS 2.5 mm had highest tensile load and torsional stiffness, SonicWeld 2.1 mm highest tensile stiffness, and BioSorbFX 2.0 mm highest bending stiffness (P < 0.001). On the basis of the results of this study, the CrossDrive (2018) and MaxDrive 1.5 mm titanium systems are recommended for midface fractures (e.g., zygomatic or maxillary fractures) and osteotomies (e.g., Le Fort I osteotomy), and the CrossDrive (2018) and MaxDrive 2.0 mm titanium systems for mandibular fractures and osteotomies when a titanium osteosynthesis system is used. When there is an indication for a biodegradable osteosynthesis system, the SonicWeld 2.1 mm or BioSorbFX 2.0 mm are recommended for midface fractures and osteotomies, and the Inion CPS 2.5 mm biodegradable system for mandibular osteotomies and non-load bearing mandibular fractures, especially when high torsional forces are expected (e.g., mandibular symphysis fractures).

摘要

为了指导骨固定系统的选择,本研究比较了可吸收和钛骨固定系统的力学性能。SonicPins Rx 和 xG 进行了拔出试验。此外,还评估了 15 种可吸收(Inion CPS 2.0 和 2.5mm;LactoSorb 2.0mm;Macropore 2.0mm;Polymax 2.0mm;BioSorb FX 2.0mm;ResorbX 2.1mm;Osteotrans-MX 2.0mm 带 1.0 和 1.4mm 板厚;SonicWeld Rx/Rx、xG/Rx 和 xG/xG 2.1mm 无和有钻孔扩孔)和 6 种钛(CrossDrive(2006)、CrossDrive(2018)、MaxDrive;均为 1.5 和 2.0mm)直型、四孔骨固定系统。所有系统均进行了拉伸、弯曲和扭转试验。SonicPins 的拔出负荷相当(P=0.423)。钛系统的拉伸负荷高于可吸收系统(P<0.001)。CrossDrive(2018)和 MaxDrive 系统的拉伸和扭转刚度较低,与相应的 CrossDrive(2006)系统相比,延展性较高(P<0.001)。1.5mm 钛系统的弯曲刚度与所有可吸收系统相当,2.0mm 系统的弯曲刚度高于所有可吸收系统(P<0.001)。关于可吸收系统,Inion CPS 2.5mm 具有最高的拉伸负荷和扭转刚度,SonicWeld 2.1mm 具有最高的拉伸刚度,而 BioSorb FX 2.0mm 具有最高的弯曲刚度(P<0.001)。基于本研究的结果,建议在使用钛骨固定系统时,使用 CrossDrive(2018)和 MaxDrive 1.5mm 钛系统治疗中面部骨折(如颧骨或上颌骨骨折)和截骨术(如 Le Fort I 截骨术),使用 CrossDrive(2018)和 MaxDrive 2.0mm 钛系统治疗下颌骨骨折和截骨术。当需要使用钛骨固定系统时,如果需要可吸收骨固定系统,则建议使用 SonicWeld 2.1mm 或 BioSorb FX 2.0mm 治疗中面部骨折和截骨术,使用 Inion CPS 2.5mm 可吸收系统治疗下颌骨截骨术和非承重下颌骨骨折,特别是当预期存在高扭转力时(如下颌骨联合骨折)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5d6e/7584639/c314ae2a3d65/41598_2020_75299_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验