Pisko E J, Strader K, Rice D, White R, Goodman L A
Department of Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Pharmatherapeutica. 1987;5(2):90-8.
A 6-month, double-blind, controlled, randomized, parallel study was performed to compare the efficacy and tolerance of nabumetone (1000 mg at bedtime) with naproxen (250 mg twice daily) in the treatment of osteoarthritis. Five efficacy parameters were evaluated: patient's assessment of overall osteoarthritis activity and pain, physician's assessment of overall osteoarthritis activity and pain, and physician's assessment of pain with respect to a defined activity. All 40 patients entered (20 in each group) were available for evaluation of tolerance and 36 patients for efficacy analysis (18 in each group). The efficacy results revealed significant improvement in all five parameters for each medication except measurement of pain with respect to a defined activity for naproxen (p less than 0.07). The frequency of possible or probable drug-related adverse experiences was high for both drugs. However, only 1 patient left the study because of a probable drug-related adverse experience (abdominal pain in a nabumetone patient). Six nabumetone and 4 naproxen patients dropped out of the study because of lack of efficacy. The results indicate that nabumetone and naproxen have comparable efficacy and tolerance at the dosage used, and suggest that a single night-time dosage of nabumetone may be a convenient and useful treatment for osteoarthritis.
进行了一项为期6个月的双盲、对照、随机、平行研究,以比较萘丁美酮(睡前1000毫克)和萘普生(每日两次,每次250毫克)治疗骨关节炎的疗效和耐受性。评估了五个疗效参数:患者对骨关节炎总体活动和疼痛的评估、医生对骨关节炎总体活动和疼痛的评估,以及医生对特定活动相关疼痛的评估。所有入组的40名患者(每组20名)均可供评估耐受性,36名患者可供进行疗效分析(每组18名)。疗效结果显示,除萘普生在特定活动相关疼痛测量方面外,每种药物的所有五个参数均有显著改善(p<0.07)。两种药物可能或很可能与药物相关的不良事件发生率都很高。然而,只有1名患者因可能与药物相关的不良事件(萘丁美酮患者出现腹痛)退出研究。6名萘丁美酮患者和4名萘普生患者因缺乏疗效退出研究。结果表明,萘丁美酮和萘普生在所使用的剂量下具有相当的疗效和耐受性,并表明萘丁美酮单次夜间给药可能是一种方便且有用的骨关节炎治疗方法。