Poiley J E
Arthritis Associates, Orlando, Florida 32804.
Am J Med. 1987 Oct 30;83(4B):82-5. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90601-2.
The efficacy and safety of nabumetone (1,000 mg at bedtime) and naproxen (250 mg twice daily) were compared in a six-month, randomized, double-blind study of patients with osteoarthritis. Forty patients were entered in the study and completed a washout phase, and 37 were evaluable for efficacy. Of these, 18 patients received nabumetone and 19 received naproxen. Both treatment groups had significant improvement from baseline in all of the efficacy variables measured. All 40 patients were evaluated for safety. Fifty percent of the patients treated with nabumetone and 65 percent of the patients treated with naproxen had at least one drug-related or unknown-related adverse experience. Fifteen percent of patients in both groups had treatment-related adverse experiences that were moderate or severe. There were no statistically significant differences in the two treatment groups with regard to efficacy or adverse experiences.
在一项针对骨关节炎患者的为期六个月的随机双盲研究中,比较了萘丁美酮(睡前服用1000毫克)和萘普生(每日两次,每次250毫克)的疗效和安全性。40名患者进入研究并完成了洗脱期,其中37名患者可进行疗效评估。在这些患者中,18名接受萘丁美酮治疗,19名接受萘普生治疗。两个治疗组在所有测量的疗效变量方面均较基线有显著改善。对所有40名患者进行了安全性评估。接受萘丁美酮治疗的患者中有50%,接受萘普生治疗的患者中有65%至少有一次与药物相关或原因不明的不良经历。两组中15%的患者有中度或重度的与治疗相关的不良经历。两个治疗组在疗效或不良经历方面没有统计学上的显著差异。