Pisko E J, Bockow B I, Box P, Brodsky A L, Burch F X, Collins R L, Fleischmann R M, Keller M I, Lipani J A, Poiley J E
Department of Medicine, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem 27103.
Am J Med. 1987 Oct 30;83(4B):86-91. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90602-4.
This six-month, double-blind, controlled, randomized, parallel study at 13 medical centers compared the safety and efficacy of nabumetone (1,000 mg taken at bedtime) with that of naproxen (250 mg twice daily) in the treatment of osteoarthritis in symptomatic adult outpatients. Five efficacy parameters were measured: patients' assessment of overall osteoarthritis activity and pain, physicians' assessment of overall osteoarthritis activity and pain, and physicians' assessment of pain with respect to a declined activity. All 489 patients who took medication were included in the evaluation of safety, and 455 patients (227 in the nabumetone group and 228 in the naproxen group) were evaluated for efficacy. Significant improvement in all five efficacy parameters occurred in both groups. No significant differences were found between the two groups at the end of the study in any of the five efficacy parameters. Twenty-three percent of nabumetone and 17 percent of naproxen patients withdrew from the study for lack of efficacy. At least one possible or probable treatment-related adverse experience was reported for 45 percent of nabumetone-treated patients and 42 percent of those given naproxen, and in 19 percent of the nabumetone-treated and 18 percent of the naproxen-treated patients these experiences were moderate or severe. However, only 7 percent of patients in each group withdrew from the study due to adverse experiences. Nabumetone and naproxen have comparable safety and efficacy, suggesting that a single, nighttime dose of nabumetone is a convenient, effective, and safe treatment for osteoarthritis.
这项在13个医疗中心开展的为期6个月的双盲、对照、随机、平行研究,比较了萘丁美酮(睡前服用1000毫克)与萘普生(每日两次,每次250毫克)治疗有症状的成年门诊骨关节炎患者的安全性和疗效。测量了五个疗效参数:患者对骨关节炎总体活动和疼痛的评估、医生对骨关节炎总体活动和疼痛的评估,以及医生对因活动减少所致疼痛的评估。所有489名服药患者均纳入安全性评估,455名患者(萘丁美酮组227名,萘普生组228名)接受疗效评估。两组在所有五个疗效参数上均有显著改善。研究结束时,两组在五个疗效参数中的任何一个上均未发现显著差异。23%的萘丁美酮患者和17%的萘普生患者因疗效不佳退出研究。45%服用萘丁美酮的患者和42%服用萘普生的患者报告了至少一种可能或很可能与治疗相关的不良经历,19%服用萘丁美酮的患者和18%服用萘普生的患者这些经历为中度或重度。然而,每组仅有7%的患者因不良经历退出研究。萘丁美酮和萘普生具有相当的安全性和疗效,这表明每晚单次服用萘丁美酮是一种方便、有效且安全的骨关节炎治疗方法。