Campedelli Gian Maria, Aziani Alberto, Favarin Serena
Department of Sociology and Social Research, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
School of Political and Social Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Am J Crim Justice. 2021;46(5):704-727. doi: 10.1007/s12103-020-09578-6. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
This work investigates whether and how COVID-19 containment policies had an immediate impact on crime trends in Los Angeles. The analysis is conducted using Bayesian structural time-series and focuses on nine crime categories and on the overall crime count, daily monitored from January 1st 2017 to March 28th 2020. We concentrate on two post-intervention time windows-from March 4th to March 16th and from March 4th to March 28th 2020-to dynamically assess the short-term effects of mild and strict policies. In Los Angeles, overall crime has significantly decreased, as well as robbery, shoplifting, theft, and battery. No significant effect has been detected for vehicle theft, burglary, assault with a deadly weapon, intimate partner assault, and homicide. Results suggest that, in the first weeks after the interventions are put in place, social distancing impacts more directly on instrumental and less serious crimes. Policy implications are also discussed.
本研究调查了新冠疫情防控政策是否以及如何对洛杉矶的犯罪趋势产生直接影响。分析采用贝叶斯结构时间序列进行,重点关注2017年1月1日至2020年3月28日每日监测的九类犯罪以及总体犯罪数量。我们集中考察两个干预后时间窗口——2020年3月4日至3月16日以及2020年3月4日至3月28日——以动态评估温和及严格政策的短期影响。在洛杉矶,总体犯罪以及抢劫、入店行窃、盗窃和殴打案件显著减少。对于车辆盗窃、入室盗窃、使用致命武器袭击、亲密伴侣袭击和杀人案件,未发现显著影响。结果表明,在干预措施实施后的头几周,社会距离对工具性和不太严重的犯罪影响更为直接。同时还讨论了政策含义。