• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The art of balancing: the facilitator's role in briefing in simulation-based learning from the perspective of nursing students - a qualitative study.平衡的艺术:从护生视角看促进者在基于模拟的学习中的简报角色——一项定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2020 Oct 22;19:99. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00493-z. eCollection 2020.
2
Alternating between active and passive facilitator roles in simulated scenarios: a qualitative study of nursing students' perceptions.模拟场景中主动与被动引导者角色的交替:一项关于护生认知的质性研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Oct 29;7(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00233-0.
3
Post-simulation debriefing as a stepping stone to self-reflection and increased awareness - a qualitative study.模拟后汇报作为自我反思和提高意识的垫脚石——一项定性研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Aug 13;9(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00306-2.
4
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
5
Clinical facilitators' experience of near peer learning in Australian undergraduate nursing students: A qualitative study.临床促进者对澳大利亚本科护理专业学生近伴学习的体验:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Dec;95:104602. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104602. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
6
The affective component of learning in simulation-based education - facilitators' strategies to establish psychological safety and accommodate nursing students' emotions.基于模拟的教育中学习的情感成分——教育者建立心理安全和接纳护生情绪的策略。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Apr 20;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00869-3.
7
Influence of a highly focused case on the effect of small-group facilitators' content expertise on students' learning and satisfaction.一个高度聚焦的案例对小组促进者的内容专业知识对学生学习和满意度的影响。
Acad Med. 1994 Aug;69(8):663-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199408000-00016.
8
Psychological safety in simulation: Perspectives of nursing students and faculty.模拟教学中的心理安全感:护理学生和教师的观点。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Mar;122:105712. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105712. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
9
Nursing students' perceptions and satisfaction with a self-learning methodology in simulated environments: A mixed-methods study.护理专业学生对模拟环境中自主学习方法的认知和满意度:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Oct;80:104141. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104141. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
10
Supplementing Clinical Practice in Nursing Homes With Simulation Training: A Qualitative Study of Nursing Students' Experiences.用模拟训练补充养老院临床实践:一项关于护生经历的定性研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 Dec 24;6:2377960820981786. doi: 10.1177/2377960820981786. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming Communication and Non-Technical Skills in Intermediate Care Nurses Through Ultra-Realistic Clinical Simulation: A Cross-Sectional Study.通过超真实临床模拟转变中级护理护士的沟通和非技术技能:一项横断面研究
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(8):272. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15080272.
2
Post-simulation debriefing as a stepping stone to self-reflection and increased awareness - a qualitative study.模拟后汇报作为自我反思和提高意识的垫脚石——一项定性研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Aug 13;9(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00306-2.
3
Evaluation of the public health clinical rotation in medical school: a qualitative case study design.医学院公共卫生临床实习评估:定性案例研究设计。
Korean J Med Educ. 2023 Mar;35(1):93-102. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.252. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
4
Effects of roleplay simulation on improving quality management of nursing service.角色扮演模拟对改善护理服务质量管理的影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Oct 15;14(10):7443-7450. eCollection 2022.
5
Alternating between active and passive facilitator roles in simulated scenarios: a qualitative study of nursing students' perceptions.模拟场景中主动与被动引导者角色的交替:一项关于护生认知的质性研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Oct 29;7(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00233-0.
6
Clinical Application Value of Group-Sharing Nursing Management Based on Case Analysis.基于案例分析的小组分享式护理管理的临床应用价值
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Aug 13;2022:1810573. doi: 10.1155/2022/1810573. eCollection 2022.
7
The affective component of learning in simulation-based education - facilitators' strategies to establish psychological safety and accommodate nursing students' emotions.基于模拟的教育中学习的情感成分——教育者建立心理安全和接纳护生情绪的策略。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Apr 20;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00869-3.
8
The lived experiences of intensive care nursing students exposed to a new model of high-fidelity simulation training: a phenomenological study.接触新型高仿真模拟训练模式的重症监护护理专业学生的真实体验:一项现象学研究
BMC Nurs. 2021 Aug 30;20(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00667-3.
9
Comparison of Learning Transfer Using Simulation Problem-Based Learning and Demonstration: An Application of Papanicolaou Smear Nursing Education.模拟问题式学习与演示在学习迁移中的比较:巴氏涂片护理教育的应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;18(4):1765. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041765.

本文引用的文献

1
Nursing students' transfer of learning outcomes from simulation-based training to clinical practice: a focus-group study.护理专业学生学习成果从模拟培训向临床实践的转化:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Nurs. 2019 Nov 8;18:53. doi: 10.1186/s12912-019-0376-5. eCollection 2019.
2
Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research.定性研究中的可信度
Medsurg Nurs. 2016 Nov;25(6):435-6.
3
Associations of stress, self-esteem, and collective efficacy with flow in simulation among nursing students: A descriptive cross-sectional study.护理专业学生在模拟情境中压力、自尊和集体效能与心流体验的相关性:一项描述性横断面研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Dec;71:193-197. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.033. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
4
Stress of nursing students in clinical simulation: a randomized clinical trial.临床模拟中护生的压力:一项随机临床试验。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2018 May;71(3):967-974. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0187.
5
Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: An umbrella systematic review.基于模拟的学习在本科护理教育中的应用:一项综合性系统评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
6
Tips for Conducting the Pre-Brief for a Simulation.模拟预简报的开展要点。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2016 Aug 1;47(8):353-5. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20160715-05.
7
How can students contribute? A qualitative study of active student involvement in development of technological learning material for clinical skills training.学生如何做出贡献?一项关于学生积极参与临床技能培训技术学习材料开发的定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2016 Jan 12;15:2. doi: 10.1186/s12912-016-0125-y. eCollection 2016.
8
Can nursing students' confidence levels increase with repeated simulation activities?护理专业学生的自信水平会随着模拟活动的重复而提高吗?
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jan;36:419-21. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
9
NLN Jeffries Simulation Theory: Brief Narrative Description.NLN杰弗里斯模拟理论:简要叙述性描述。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):292-3. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-36.5.292.
10
Diversity of nursing student views about simulation design: a q-methodological study.护理专业学生对模拟设计看法的多样性:一项Q方法学研究。
J Nurs Educ. 2015 May;54(5):249-60. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20150417-02.

平衡的艺术:从护生视角看促进者在基于模拟的学习中的简报角色——一项定性研究

The art of balancing: the facilitator's role in briefing in simulation-based learning from the perspective of nursing students - a qualitative study.

作者信息

Solli Hilde, Haukedal Thor Arne, Husebø Sissel Eikeland, Reierson Inger Åse

机构信息

Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Postbox 235, 3603 Kongsberg, Vestfold and Telemark Norway.

Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Postbox 8600, 4036 Stavanger, Rogaland Norway.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2020 Oct 22;19:99. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00493-z. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-020-00493-z
PMID:33100906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7579795/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Facilitators plays a key role in nursing student's learning when briefing them for simulation scenarios. However, few studies have explored the importance of the facilitator's role in preparing students from the students' perspective. The aim of this study was to explore undergraduate nursing students' perspectives of the facilitator's role in briefing.

METHODS

An explorative, qualitative approach was used. Four focus group interviews with a total of 30 nursing students constituted the data source. Data collection took place in December 2017 and in May 2018. The data was analysed using systematic text condensation.

RESULTS

Two main categories were identified: "The importance of framing the subsequent scenario" and "The importance of instructing students how to execute nursing actions in the subsequent scenario". The first category consisted of three subcategories: providing predictability, providing emotional support and providing challenges. The second main category also consisted of three subcategories: providing information about medical and technical equipment, providing a demonstration of the monitor and providing a demonstration of the manikin.

CONCLUSION

A briefing is more than a general introduction to a simulation scenario, learning objectives, roles, simulation environment and medical equipment. The information provided in a briefing is important for nursing students' understanding of what they will encounter in the simulation scenario and what is being simulated, as well as possibly being a prerequisite for mastery. The facilitator's role in the briefing is complex and requires a high level of educational expertise to balance the diversity of students' learning approaches. Students have to learn how to simulate before the briefing. Therefore, we suggest separating the concepts of prebriefing and presimulation from the concept of briefing, introducing prebriefing and presimulation preparation before briefing, and possibly dividing students into groups based on their learning approach. Such interventions will make it possible for facilitators to balance between students' needs and the time available for briefing.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12912-020-00493-z.

摘要

背景

在为护理专业学生介绍模拟场景时,引导者在其学习过程中起着关键作用。然而,很少有研究从学生的角度探讨引导者在为学生做准备工作中所扮演角色的重要性。本研究的目的是探讨本科护理专业学生对引导者在介绍环节中所扮演角色的看法。

方法

采用探索性定性研究方法。对总共30名护理专业学生进行了4次焦点小组访谈,构成了数据来源。数据收集于2017年12月和2018年5月进行。使用系统文本浓缩法对数据进行分析。

结果

确定了两个主要类别:“构建后续场景的重要性”和“指导学生如何在后续场景中执行护理操作的重要性”。第一类包括三个子类别:提供可预测性、提供情感支持和提供挑战。第二个主要类别也包括三个子类别:提供有关医疗和技术设备的信息、演示监护仪以及演示人体模型。

结论

介绍环节不仅仅是对模拟场景、学习目标、角色、模拟环境和医疗设备的一般性介绍。介绍环节中提供的信息对于护理专业学生理解他们在模拟场景中将遇到什么以及正在模拟什么非常重要,并且可能是掌握相关内容的先决条件。引导者在介绍环节中的角色很复杂,需要高水平的教育专业知识来平衡学生学习方法的多样性。学生在介绍环节之前必须先学习如何进行模拟。因此,我们建议将预介绍和预模拟的概念与介绍的概念区分开来,在介绍之前引入预介绍和预模拟准备,并可能根据学生的学习方法将他们分成小组。这样的干预措施将使引导者能够在学生的需求和可用于介绍的时间之间取得平衡。

补充信息

与本文一同发表于10.1186/s12912 - 020 - 00493 - z。