• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Post-simulation debriefing as a stepping stone to self-reflection and increased awareness - a qualitative study.模拟后汇报作为自我反思和提高意识的垫脚石——一项定性研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Aug 13;9(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00306-2.
2
Alternating between active and passive facilitator roles in simulated scenarios: a qualitative study of nursing students' perceptions.模拟场景中主动与被动引导者角色的交替:一项关于护生认知的质性研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Oct 29;7(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00233-0.
3
Nursing students' perceptions of learning after high fidelity simulation: Effects of a Three-step Post-simulation Reflection Model.护理专业学生对高保真模拟后学习的认知:三步模拟后反思模型的效果
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 May;40:219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
4
The art of balancing: the facilitator's role in briefing in simulation-based learning from the perspective of nursing students - a qualitative study.平衡的艺术:从护生视角看促进者在基于模拟的学习中的简报角色——一项定性研究
BMC Nurs. 2020 Oct 22;19:99. doi: 10.1186/s12912-020-00493-z. eCollection 2020.
5
Fluctuating cohesion: A grounded theory study of nursing students engaged in a combined debriefing format.波动的凝聚力:一项关于参与联合汇报模式的护理学生的扎根理论研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 Mar;76:103943. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103943. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
6
Second-year undergraduate nursing students' experiences with clinical simulation training in mental health clinical practice: A focus group study.本科二年级护理专业学生在精神卫生临床实践中进行临床模拟训练的体验:一项焦点小组研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Jan;66:103534. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103534. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
7
Comparative analysis of nursing students' reflection levels before and after debriefing in simulation training in South Korea: qualitative analysis design.韩国模拟训练中汇报前后护理专业学生反思水平的比较分析:定性分析设计
Child Health Nurs Res. 2024 Jul;30(3):167-175. doi: 10.4094/chnr.2024.015. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
8
The relationship between facilitators' questions and the level of reflection in postsimulation debriefing.促进者提问与模拟后讨论中反思水平的关系。
Simul Healthc. 2013 Jun;8(3):135-42. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31827cbb5c.
9
Contribution of a reflective debriefing to nursing students' clinical judgment in patient deterioration simulations: A mixed-methods study.反思汇报对护生在患者病情恶化模拟中的临床判断的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Mar;50:51-56. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.

引用本文的文献

1
Lasting impact of undergraduate operating room shadowing on novice nurses: a ChatGPT-supported qualitative study.本科手术室见习对新手护士的持久影响:一项由ChatGPT支持的定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Sep 2;24(1):1151. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03770-x.
2
Simulation-Based Education and Nursing Student Learning Motivations: A Scoping Review.基于模拟的教育与护生学习动机:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2025 May 18;17(5):e84375. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84375. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Cultural differences in simulation debriefing: A qualitative analysis.模拟演练后汇报中的文化差异:一项定性分析
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 25;9(4):e14904. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14904. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Psychological safety in simulation: Perspectives of nursing students and faculty.模拟教学中的心理安全感:护理学生和教师的观点。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Mar;122:105712. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105712. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
3
Students and simulation facilitators' experiences and perceptions of a distraction and interruption simulation: a mixed-methods study.学生和模拟促进者对分心和中断模拟的体验和看法:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Jan;120:105634. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105634. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
4
Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review.模拟讲评作为护理教育临床教学模拟的一部分:范围综述。
Nurs Open. 2023 Mar;10(3):1217-1233. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1426. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
5
Alternating between active and passive facilitator roles in simulated scenarios: a qualitative study of nursing students' perceptions.模拟场景中主动与被动引导者角色的交替:一项关于护生认知的质性研究
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Oct 29;7(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00233-0.
6
Nursing students' experiences and perception of peer feedback: A qualitative systematic review.护理专业学生对同伴反馈的体验和看法:一项定性系统评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Sep;116:105469. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105469. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
7
High-fidelity simulation duration and learning outcomes among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高保真模拟持续时间和本科护生学习成果之间的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Sep;116:105435. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105435. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
8
Health professional students' self-reported emotions during simulation-based education: An interpretive descriptive study.健康专业学生在基于模拟的教育中的自我报告情绪:解释性描述性研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Aug;63:103353. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103353. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
9
The affective component of learning in simulation-based education - facilitators' strategies to establish psychological safety and accommodate nursing students' emotions.基于模拟的教育中学习的情感成分——教育者建立心理安全和接纳护生情绪的策略。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Apr 20;21(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00869-3.
10
Student-Centered Reflection During Debriefing: A Mixed-Methods Study.学生为中心的反思在汇报中:一项混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ. 2022;47(4):230-235. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001140. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

模拟后汇报作为自我反思和提高意识的垫脚石——一项定性研究

Post-simulation debriefing as a stepping stone to self-reflection and increased awareness - a qualitative study.

作者信息

Husebø Sissel Eikeland, Reierson Inger Åse, Hansen Anette, Solli Hilde

机构信息

Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Post Box 8600, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.

Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Research Group Clinical Competence in Nursing Education, University of South-Eastern Norway, Post Box 4, 3199, Borre, Norway.

出版信息

Adv Simul (Lond). 2024 Aug 13;9(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s41077-024-00306-2.

DOI:10.1186/s41077-024-00306-2
PMID:39138538
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11320937/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The voice of the students should be engaged in simulation curriculum development. Involving the students in the development of debriefing strategies might result in a deeper understanding of learning. However, few studies have investigated the students' perspectives on debriefing strategies. The aim of the study was to explore nursing students' perspectives on the post-simulation debriefing.

METHODS

An explorative, descriptive design with a qualitative approach was used. Data were collected in December 2017 and May 2018 through focus group interviews with undergraduate nursing students in Norway immediately after a 2-day high-fidelity simulation course in the second year of their Bachelor of Nursing degree. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation.

RESULTS

Thirty-two nursing students participated in the study. The data analysis identified two main categories. The category 'Facilitator as a catalyst for reflection' illustrated the facilitator's multifaceted and vital role in initiating and guiding the students' reflection process in the debriefing. The category 'A process towards increased awareness' encompasses the students' guided process of acquiring new insight into their professional development, and how they put parts together to see the wholeness in what was simulated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides knowledge to facilitators regarding nursing students' perspectives on facilitating reflection and learning during debriefing discussions. The facilitator's multifaceted role in guiding the students' reflections and their process of acquiring new insight into their professional development were identified as critical to learning during debriefing.

摘要

背景

学生的意见应参与模拟课程的开发。让学生参与制定汇报策略可能会使他们对学习有更深入的理解。然而,很少有研究调查学生对汇报策略的看法。本研究的目的是探讨护理专业学生对模拟后汇报的看法。

方法

采用探索性、描述性设计,运用定性研究方法。2017年12月和2018年5月,在挪威护理专业本科学生完成为期两天的高保真模拟课程后,立即通过焦点小组访谈收集数据。采用系统文本浓缩法对数据进行分析。

结果

32名护理专业学生参与了本研究。数据分析确定了两个主要类别。“促进者作为反思的催化剂”这一类别说明了促进者在汇报过程中启动和引导学生反思过程中所起的多方面重要作用。“提高意识的过程”这一类别涵盖了学生在职业发展中获得新见解的引导过程,以及他们如何将各个部分整合起来以理解模拟内容的全貌。

结论

本研究为促进者提供了有关护理专业学生在汇报讨论中对促进反思和学习的看法的知识。促进者在引导学生反思以及他们获得职业发展新见解的过程中所起的多方面作用被认为对汇报期间的学习至关重要。