• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响对话机器人主观意见归因的因素。

Factors influencing subjective opinion attribution to conversational robots.

作者信息

Sakamoto Yuki, Uchida Takahisa, Ban Midori, Ishiguro Hiroshi

机构信息

Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Front Robot AI. 2025 Apr 16;12:1521169. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1521169. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/frobt.2025.1521169
PMID:40309083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12040941/
Abstract

The usefulness of conversational robots has been demonstrated in various fields. It is suggested that expressing subjective opinions is essential for conversational robots to stimulate users' willingness to engage in conversation. However, a challenge remains in that users often find it difficult to attribute subjective opinions to robots. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the factors influencing the attribution of subjective opinions to robots. We investigated robot and human factors that may affect subjective opinion attribution to robots. Furthermore, these factors were investigated in four different cases, adopting a combination of the robots' types and control methods, considering actual scenarios of robot usage. The survey was conducted online, and the participants completed a questionnaire after receiving instructions regarding the robot. The results revealed that the perception of the robots' sensory capabilities significantly influenced the attribution of subjective opinions in all the surveyed cases. Additionally, in the case of an autonomous small robot, there is a possibility that participants' self-perception of their judgment abilities might also impact their subjective opinion attribution to the robot. The findings highlight the importance of aligning subjective opinion utterances in conversational robots with user perceptions of the robot's sensory capabilities. They also emphasized the significance of exploring how users' self-perceptions influence their perceptions of robots. These insights provide valuable guidance for designing conversational strategies and speech generation in robots that engage in the exchange of subjective opinions with humans.

摘要

对话机器人的实用性已在各个领域得到证明。有人认为,表达主观意见对于对话机器人激发用户参与对话的意愿至关重要。然而,一个挑战仍然存在,即用户通常很难将主观意见归因于机器人。因此,本研究旨在探讨影响将主观意见归因于机器人的因素。我们调查了可能影响对机器人主观意见归因的机器人和人类因素。此外,考虑到机器人使用的实际场景,采用机器人类型和控制方法的组合,在四种不同情况下对这些因素进行了调查。调查通过在线方式进行,参与者在收到有关机器人的说明后完成了一份问卷。结果显示,在所有调查案例中,对机器人感官能力的感知显著影响了主观意见的归因。此外,在自主小型机器人的情况下,参与者对自己判断能力的自我感知也有可能影响他们对机器人的主观意见归因。研究结果突出了使对话机器人中的主观意见表达与用户对机器人感官能力的感知保持一致的重要性。它们还强调了探索用户的自我感知如何影响他们对机器人的感知的重要性。这些见解为设计与人类进行主观意见交流的机器人的对话策略和语音生成提供了有价值的指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d22/12040941/bd6d6ec193cd/frobt-12-1521169-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d22/12040941/640b403d11ba/frobt-12-1521169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d22/12040941/eeb6cbe8dc19/frobt-12-1521169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d22/12040941/0d533c5a4809/frobt-12-1521169-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d22/12040941/bd6d6ec193cd/frobt-12-1521169-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d22/12040941/640b403d11ba/frobt-12-1521169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d22/12040941/eeb6cbe8dc19/frobt-12-1521169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d22/12040941/0d533c5a4809/frobt-12-1521169-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d22/12040941/bd6d6ec193cd/frobt-12-1521169-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors influencing subjective opinion attribution to conversational robots.影响对话机器人主观意见归因的因素。
Front Robot AI. 2025 Apr 16;12:1521169. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1521169. eCollection 2025.
2
Opinion attribution improves motivation to exchange subjective opinions with humanoid robots.观点归属提高了与类人机器人交流主观观点的积极性。
Front Robot AI. 2024 Feb 19;11:1175879. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1175879. eCollection 2024.
3
Freedom comes at a cost?: An exploratory study on affordances' impact on users' perception of a social robot.自由是有代价的?:关于可供性对用户对社交机器人认知影响的探索性研究
Front Robot AI. 2024 Mar 18;11:1288818. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1288818. eCollection 2024.
4
Mind Perception in HRI: Exploring Users' Attribution of Mental and Emotional States to Robots with Different Behavioural Styles.人机交互中的心智感知:探究用户对具有不同行为风格的机器人的心理和情感状态归因
Int J Soc Robot. 2023;15(5):867-877. doi: 10.1007/s12369-023-00989-z. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
5
Collaborating eye to eye: Effects of workplace design on the perception of dominance of collaboration robots.眼神交流式协作:工作场所设计对协作机器人主导感认知的影响
Front Robot AI. 2022 Sep 27;9:999308. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.999308. eCollection 2022.
6
The Effects of Stakeholder Perceptions on the Use of Humanoid Robots in Care for Older Adults: Postinteraction Cross-Sectional Study.利益相关者认知对老年护理用人形机器人使用的影响:互动后横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 4;25:e46617. doi: 10.2196/46617.
7
Which One? Choosing Favorite Robot After Different Styles of Storytelling and Robots' Conversation.哪一个?在不同的叙事风格和机器人对话之后选择最喜欢的机器人。
Front Robot AI. 2021 Sep 9;8:700005. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.700005. eCollection 2021.
8
The robotic mentalist - On the influences of robots' mentalizing abilities and external manipulative intent on people's credibility attributions.机器人读心者——论机器人的读心能力和外部操纵意图对人们可信度归因的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 26;13:993302. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.993302. eCollection 2022.
9
The Influence of Robots' Fairness on Humans' Reward-Punishment Behaviors and Trust in Human-Robot Cooperative Teams.机器人公平性对人类奖惩行为和人机协作团队信任的影响。
Hum Factors. 2024 Apr;66(4):1103-1117. doi: 10.1177/00187208221133272. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
10
Determinants of Attitude to a Humanoid Social Robot in Care for Older Adults: A Post-Interaction Study.老年人护理中对人形社交机器人态度的决定因素:互动后研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Sep 8;29:e941205. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941205.

本文引用的文献

1
Opinion attribution improves motivation to exchange subjective opinions with humanoid robots.观点归属提高了与类人机器人交流主观观点的积极性。
Front Robot AI. 2024 Feb 19;11:1175879. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1175879. eCollection 2024.
2
A study of interactive robot architecture through the practical implementation of conversational android.通过对话式安卓机器人的实际应用对交互式机器人架构进行的一项研究。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Oct 11;9:905030. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.905030. eCollection 2022.
3
Robot Voices in Daily Life: Vocal Human-Likeness and Application Context as Determinants of User Acceptance.
日常生活中的机器人声音:声音的拟人化程度与应用场景对用户接受度的影响
Front Psychol. 2022 May 13;13:787499. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.787499. eCollection 2022.
4
Endowing a NAO Robot With Practical Social-Touch Perception.赋予NAO机器人实用的社交触觉感知能力。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Apr 19;9:840335. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.840335. eCollection 2022.
5
A Robot Is Not Worth Another: Exploring Children's Mental State Attribution to Different Humanoid Robots.一个机器人并不比另一个更有价值:探究儿童对不同类人机器人的心理状态归因。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:2011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02011. eCollection 2020.
6
The Development and Validation of the Rational and Intuitive Decision Styles Scale.理性与直觉决策风格量表的编制与验证
J Pers Assess. 2016 Sep-Oct;98(5):523-35. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1132426. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
7
Seeing Minds in Others - Can Agents with Robotic Appearance Have Human-Like Preferences?洞察他人内心——外表像机器人的智能体能否拥有类似人类的偏好?
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 8;11(1):e0146310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146310. eCollection 2016.
8
Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate.双重加工理论的高阶认知:推进辩论。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):223-41. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685.
9
Assessing vividness of mental imagery: The Plymouth Sensory Imagery Questionnaire.评估心理意象的生动程度:普利茅斯感觉意象问卷。
Br J Psychol. 2014 Nov;105(4):547-63. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12050. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
10
Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI.机器能思考吗?通过功能磁共振成像研究与机器人的互动及观点采择。
PLoS One. 2008 Jul 9;3(7):e2597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002597.