脉冲氙气紫外光对……减少的疗效 。（原文不完整）
Efficacy of pulsed-xenon ultraviolet light on reduction of .
作者信息
Huber Thomas W, Brackens Emma, Chatterjee Piyali, Villamaria Frank C, Sisco Lauren E, Williams Marjory D, Coppin John David, Choi Hosoon, Jinadatha Chetan
机构信息
Research Service, Central Texas Veterans Health Care System, Temple, TX, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor Scott & White Memorial Hospital, Temple, TX.
出版信息
SAGE Open Med. 2020 Oct 10;8:2050312120962372. doi: 10.1177/2050312120962372. eCollection 2020.
OBJECTIVES
Hospitals and healthcare facilities rely largely on isolation and environmental disinfection to prevent transmission of pathogens. The use of no-touch technology is an accepted practice for environmental decontamination in medical care facilities, but little has been published about the effect of ultraviolet light generated by a portable pulsed-xenon device use on Mycobacteria. We used which is more resistant to ultraviolet radiation and less virulent than , to determine the effectiveness of portable pulsed-xenon devices on in a laboratory environment.
METHODS
To determine the effectiveness of pulsed-xenon devices, we measured the bactericidal effect of pulsed-xenon devices on
RESULTS
In five separate experiments irradiating an average of 10 organisms, the mean (standard deviation) log-kill at 5 min was 3.98 (0.60), at 10 min was 4.96 (0.42), and at 15 min was 5.64 (0.52).
CONCLUSIONS
Our results demonstrate that using pulsed-xenon devices is a highly effective modality to reduce microbial counts with this relatively ultraviolet germicidal irradiation-resistant mycobacterium in a time-dependent manner.
目的
医院和医疗保健机构在很大程度上依赖隔离和环境消毒来预防病原体传播。在医疗机构中，使用非接触技术进行环境净化是一种公认的做法，但关于便携式脉冲氙气设备产生的紫外线对分枝杆菌的影响，相关报道较少。我们使用了比[此处原文缺失具体比较对象]更耐紫外线辐射且毒性更低的[此处原文缺失具体对象]，来确定便携式脉冲氙气设备在实验室环境中对[此处原文缺失具体对象]的有效性。
方法
为了确定脉冲氙气设备的有效性，我们测量了脉冲氙气设备对[此处原文缺失具体对象]的杀菌效果。
结果
在五个分别照射平均10个生物体的实验中，5分钟时的平均（标准差）对数杀灭率为3.98（0.60），10分钟时为4.96（0.42），15分钟时为5.64（0.52）。
结论
我们的结果表明，使用脉冲氙气设备是一种非常有效的方式，能够以时间依赖的方式减少这种相对耐紫外线杀菌照射的分枝杆菌的微生物数量。
Zotero 插件