Olalekan Adesola, Iwalokun Bamidele, Akinloye Oluwabukola M, Popoola Olayiwola, Samuel Titilola A, Akinloye Oluyemi
Department of Medical Laboratory Science, University of Lagos, Idiaraba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Centre for Genomics of Non-Communicable Diseases and Personalized Healthcare (CGNPH), University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria.
Afr J Lab Med. 2020 Sep 30;9(1):1255. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v9i1.1255. eCollection 2020.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has impacted heavily on global health. Although real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the current diagnostic method, challenges for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) necessitate cheaper, higher-throughput, reliable rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs).
We reviewed the documented performance characteristics of available COVID-19 RDTs to understand their public health utility in the ongoing pandemic, especially in resource-scarce LMIC settings.
Using a scoping review methodology framework, common literature databases and documentary reports were searched up to 22 April 2020, irrespective of geographical location. The search terms included 'SARS-CoV-2 AND serological testing' and 'COVID-19 AND serological testing'.
A total of 18 RDTs produced in eight countries, namely China (6; 33.33%), the United States (4; 22.22%), Germany (2; 11.11%), Singapore (2; 11.11%), Canada, Kenya, Korea and Belgium (1 each; 5.56%), were evaluated. Reported sensitivity ranged from 18.4% to 100% (average = 84.7%), whereas specificity ranged from 90.6% to 100% (average = 95.6%). The testing time ranged from 2 min to 30 min. Of the 12 validated RDTs, the IgM/IgG duo kit with non-colloidal gold labelling system was reported to elicit the highest sensitivity (98% - 100%) and specificity (98% - 99% for IgG and 96% - 99% for IgM).
We found reports of high sensitivity and specificity among the developed RDTs that could complement RT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, especially for screening in LMICs. However, it is necessary to validate these kits locally.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引起的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对全球健康造成了严重影响。尽管实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)是目前的诊断方法,但中低收入国家(LMICs)面临的挑战使得需要更便宜、高通量、可靠的快速诊断测试(RDTs)。
我们回顾了现有COVID-19快速诊断测试(RDTs)已记录的性能特征,以了解它们在当前大流行中,特别是在资源匮乏的中低收入国家环境中的公共卫生效用。
采用范围综述方法框架,检索截至2020年4月22日的常见文献数据库和文献报告,不考虑地理位置。检索词包括“SARS-CoV-2与血清学检测”和“COVID-19与血清学检测”。
共评估了八个国家生产的18种快速诊断测试(RDTs),其中中国6种(33.33%)、美国4种(22.22%)、德国2种(11.11%)、新加坡2种(11.11%)、加拿大、肯尼亚、韩国和比利时各1种(各占5.56%)。报告的灵敏度范围为18.4%至100%(平均=84.7%),而特异性范围为90.6%至100%(平均=95.6%)。检测时间从2分钟到30分钟不等。在12种经过验证的快速诊断测试(RDTs)中,据报道,采用非胶体金标记系统的IgM/IgG双联试剂盒具有最高的灵敏度(98%-100%)和特异性(IgG为98%-99%,IgM为96%-99%)。
我们发现已开发的快速诊断测试(RDTs)中有关于高灵敏度和特异性的报告,这些测试可以补充RT-PCR用于检测SARS-CoV-2抗体,特别是用于中低收入国家的筛查。然而,有必要在当地对这些试剂盒进行验证。