Suppr超能文献

新冠病毒快速诊断检测可能在低收入和中等收入国家遏制传播。

COVID-19 rapid diagnostic test could contain transmission in low- and middle-income countries.

作者信息

Olalekan Adesola, Iwalokun Bamidele, Akinloye Oluwabukola M, Popoola Olayiwola, Samuel Titilola A, Akinloye Oluyemi

机构信息

Department of Medical Laboratory Science, University of Lagos, Idiaraba, Lagos, Nigeria.

Centre for Genomics of Non-Communicable Diseases and Personalized Healthcare (CGNPH), University of Lagos, Akoka, Lagos, Nigeria.

出版信息

Afr J Lab Med. 2020 Sep 30;9(1):1255. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v9i1.1255. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has impacted heavily on global health. Although real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the current diagnostic method, challenges for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) necessitate cheaper, higher-throughput, reliable rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs).

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the documented performance characteristics of available COVID-19 RDTs to understand their public health utility in the ongoing pandemic, especially in resource-scarce LMIC settings.

METHODS

Using a scoping review methodology framework, common literature databases and documentary reports were searched up to 22 April 2020, irrespective of geographical location. The search terms included 'SARS-CoV-2 AND serological testing' and 'COVID-19 AND serological testing'.

RESULTS

A total of 18 RDTs produced in eight countries, namely China (6; 33.33%), the United States (4; 22.22%), Germany (2; 11.11%), Singapore (2; 11.11%), Canada, Kenya, Korea and Belgium (1 each; 5.56%), were evaluated. Reported sensitivity ranged from 18.4% to 100% (average = 84.7%), whereas specificity ranged from 90.6% to 100% (average = 95.6%). The testing time ranged from 2 min to 30 min. Of the 12 validated RDTs, the IgM/IgG duo kit with non-colloidal gold labelling system was reported to elicit the highest sensitivity (98% - 100%) and specificity (98% - 99% for IgG and 96% - 99% for IgM).

CONCLUSION

We found reports of high sensitivity and specificity among the developed RDTs that could complement RT-PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, especially for screening in LMICs. However, it is necessary to validate these kits locally.

摘要

背景

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引起的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对全球健康造成了严重影响。尽管实时聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)是目前的诊断方法,但中低收入国家(LMICs)面临的挑战使得需要更便宜、高通量、可靠的快速诊断测试(RDTs)。

目的

我们回顾了现有COVID-19快速诊断测试(RDTs)已记录的性能特征,以了解它们在当前大流行中,特别是在资源匮乏的中低收入国家环境中的公共卫生效用。

方法

采用范围综述方法框架,检索截至2020年4月22日的常见文献数据库和文献报告,不考虑地理位置。检索词包括“SARS-CoV-2与血清学检测”和“COVID-19与血清学检测”。

结果

共评估了八个国家生产的18种快速诊断测试(RDTs),其中中国6种(33.33%)、美国4种(22.22%)、德国2种(11.11%)、新加坡2种(11.11%)、加拿大、肯尼亚、韩国和比利时各1种(各占5.56%)。报告的灵敏度范围为18.4%至100%(平均=84.7%),而特异性范围为90.6%至100%(平均=95.6%)。检测时间从2分钟到30分钟不等。在12种经过验证的快速诊断测试(RDTs)中,据报道,采用非胶体金标记系统的IgM/IgG双联试剂盒具有最高的灵敏度(98%-100%)和特异性(IgG为98%-99%,IgM为96%-99%)。

结论

我们发现已开发的快速诊断测试(RDTs)中有关于高灵敏度和特异性的报告,这些测试可以补充RT-PCR用于检测SARS-CoV-2抗体,特别是用于中低收入国家的筛查。然而,有必要在当地对这些试剂盒进行验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feb7/7567180/e995efbd142d/AJLM-9-1255-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验