• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么听众有时(但并非总是)以自我为中心?在参考交际中推断使用他人视角。

Why are listeners sometimes (but not always) egocentric? Making inferences about using others' perspective in referential communication.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Oct 26;15(10):e0240521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240521. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0240521
PMID:33104751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7588066/
Abstract

Theory of Mind (ToM) is the ability to understand others' mental states, and that these mental states can differ from our own. Although healthy adults have little trouble passing conceptual tests of ToM (e.g., the false belief task [1]), they do not always succeed in using ToM [2,3]. In order to be successful in referential communication, listeners need to correctly infer the way in which a speaker's perspective constrains reference and inhibit their own perspective accordingly. However, listeners may require prompts to take these effortful inferential steps. The current study investigated the possibility of embedding prompts in the instructions for listeners to make inference about using a speaker's perspective. Experiment 1 showed that provision of a clear introductory example of the full chain of inferences resulted in large improvement in performance. Residual egocentric errors suggested that the improvement was not simply due to superior comprehension of the instructions. Experiment 2 further dissociated the effect by placing selective emphasis on making inference about inhibiting listeners' own perspective versus using the speaker's perspective. Results showed that only the latter had a significant effect on successful performance. The current findings clearly demonstrated that listeners do not readily make inferences about using speakers' perspectives, but can do so when prompted.

摘要

心理理论(Theory of Mind,ToM)是指理解他人心理状态的能力,并且这些心理状态可能与我们自己的心理状态不同。尽管健康成年人在通过心理理论的概念测试(例如,错误信念任务[1])方面几乎没有困难,但他们并不总是能够成功运用心理理论[2,3]。为了成功进行指代性交流,听众需要正确推断说话者的视角如何限制参考,并相应地抑制自己的视角。然而,听众可能需要提示来进行这些费力的推理步骤。本研究探讨了在听众进行关于使用说话者视角的推理的指令中嵌入提示的可能性。实验 1 表明,提供一个完整推理链的清晰介绍性示例,可大大提高表现。残留的自我中心错误表明,这种改进并非仅仅是由于对指令的更好理解。实验 2 通过选择性地强调关于抑制听众自身视角与使用说话者视角的推理,进一步分离了这种效果。结果表明,只有后者对成功表现有显著影响。当前的研究结果清楚地表明,听众不会轻易地对使用说话者视角进行推理,但在受到提示时可以进行推理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/7588066/8bc41097cde3/pone.0240521.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/7588066/a9f8fac7c31d/pone.0240521.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/7588066/707d47551288/pone.0240521.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/7588066/8bc41097cde3/pone.0240521.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/7588066/a9f8fac7c31d/pone.0240521.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/7588066/707d47551288/pone.0240521.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa8f/7588066/8bc41097cde3/pone.0240521.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Why are listeners sometimes (but not always) egocentric? Making inferences about using others' perspective in referential communication.为什么听众有时(但并非总是)以自我为中心?在参考交际中推断使用他人视角。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 26;15(10):e0240521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240521. eCollection 2020.
2
Task constraints distinguish perspective inferences from perspective use during discourse interpretation in a false belief task.在错误信念任务的语篇解释过程中,任务限制将视角推理与视角运用区分开来。
Cognition. 2015 Jun;139:50-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Mar 22.
3
The cognitive demands of remembering a speaker's perspective and managing common ground size modulate 8- and 10-year-olds' perspective-taking abilities.记住说话者观点和管理共同背景大小的认知需求会调节8岁和10岁儿童的观点采择能力。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Oct;174:130-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
4
Dissociation of understanding from applying others' false beliefs in remitted schizophrenia: evidence from a computerized referential communication task.从缓解期精神分裂症患者对他人错误信念的理解和应用中分离出来:来自计算机化参照沟通任务的证据。
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 May 17;13:141. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-141.
5
Communicative functions of directional verbal probabilities: Speaker's choice, listener's inference, and reference points.方向性言语概率的交际功能:说话者的选择、听者的推断及参照点
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Oct;70(10):2141-2158. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1225779. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
6
Perspective-taking across cultures: shared biases in Taiwanese and British adults.跨文化的观点采择:台湾和英国成年人中的共同偏见
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Nov 20;6(11):190540. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190540. eCollection 2019 Nov.
7
Adjustment of speaker's referential expressions to an addressee's likely knowledge and link with theory of mind abilities.将说话者的指称表达调整为与听话者可能具备的知识相匹配,并与心理理论能力建立联系。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 17;6:823. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00823. eCollection 2015.
8
Correction: Why are listeners sometimes (but not always) egocentric? Making inferences about using others' perspective in referential communication.更正:为什么听众有时(但并非总是)以自我为中心?在指称性交流中推断如何采用他人视角。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 1;16(11):e0259617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259617. eCollection 2021.
9
Looking to understand: the coupling between speakers' and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension.寻求理解:说话者和听话者的眼球运动之间的耦合及其与话语理解的关系。
Cogn Sci. 2005 Nov 12;29(6):1045-60. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_29.
10
Privileged versus shared knowledge about object identity in real-time referential processing.实时指称处理中关于客体身份的特权知识与共享知识
Cognition. 2015 Sep;142:148-65. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Remembering visual and linguistic common ground in shared history.铭记共享历史中的视觉和语言共同点。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Nov;77(11):2244-2255. doi: 10.1177/17470218241256651. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
2
Are you thinking what I'm thinking? Perspective-taking in a language game.你想的和我想的一样吗?语言游戏中的换位思考。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 5;19(1):e0288330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288330. eCollection 2024.
3
Correction: Why are listeners sometimes (but not always) egocentric? Making inferences about using others' perspective in referential communication.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspective-taking across cultures: shared biases in Taiwanese and British adults.跨文化的观点采择:台湾和英国成年人中的共同偏见
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Nov 20;6(11):190540. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190540. eCollection 2019 Nov.
2
Interacting Timescales in Perspective-Taking.换位思考中的交互时间尺度
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 10;9:1278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01278. eCollection 2018.
3
Executive function underlies both perspective selection and calculation in Level-1 visual perspective taking.执行功能是一级视觉观点采择中视角选择和计算的基础。
更正:为什么听众有时(但并非总是)以自我为中心?在指称性交流中推断如何采用他人视角。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 1;16(11):e0259617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259617. eCollection 2021.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1526-1534. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1496-8.
4
The cognitive demands of remembering a speaker's perspective and managing common ground size modulate 8- and 10-year-olds' perspective-taking abilities.记住说话者观点和管理共同背景大小的认知需求会调节8岁和10岁儿童的观点采择能力。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Oct;174:130-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
5
Error rate on the director's task is influenced by the need to take another's perspective but not the type of perspective.主管任务的错误率受采取他人视角的必要性影响,但不受视角类型影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Aug 16;4(8):170284. doi: 10.1098/rsos.170284. eCollection 2017 Aug.
6
Using perspective to resolve reference: The impact of cognitive load and motivation.运用视角解决指代问题:认知负荷与动机的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Apr;43(4):591-610. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000345. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
7
Language complexity modulates 8- and 10-year-olds' success at using their theory of mind abilities in a communication task.语言复杂性会调节8岁和10岁儿童在交流任务中运用心理理论能力的成功率。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Sep;149:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
8
Perspective-taking in comprehension, production, and memory: An individual differences approach.理解、表达和记忆中的换位思考:一种个体差异研究方法。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Oct;144(5):898-915. doi: 10.1037/xge0000093. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
9
Perspective-taking abilities in the balance between autism tendencies and psychosis proneness.在自闭症倾向与精神病易感性之间的平衡中,换位思考能力。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jun 7;282(1808):20150563. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0563.
10
Trust and social reciprocity in adolescence--a matter of perspective-taking.青少年时期的信任与社会互惠——换位思考的问题。
J Adolesc. 2014 Feb;37(2):175-84. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Dec 25.